Atlas based kinematic optimum design of the Stewart parallel manipulator
- 146 Downloads
Abstract
Optimum design is a key approach to make full use of potential advantages of a parallel manipulator. The optimum design of multi-parameter parallel manipulators(more than three design parameters), such as Stewart manipulator, relies on analysis based and algorithm based optimum design methods, which fall to be accurate or intuitive. To solve this problem and achieve both accurate and intuition, atlas based optimum design of a general Stewart parallel manipulator is established, with rational selection of design parameters. Based on the defined spherical usable workspace(SUW), primary kinematic performance indices of the Stewart manipulator, involving workspace and condition number are introduced and analyzed. Then, corresponding performance atlases are drawn with the established non-dimensional design space, and impact of joint distribution angles on the manipulator performance is analyzed and illustrated. At last, an example on atlas based optimum design of the Stewart manipulator is accomplished to illustrate the optimum design process, considering the end-effector posture. Deduced atlases can be flexibly applied to both quantitative and qualitative analysis to get the desired optimal design for the Stewart manipulator with respect to related performance requirements. Besides, the established optimum design method can be further applied to other multi-parameter parallel manipulators.
Keywords
optimum design performance atlas parallel mechanism StewartPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]TANG X, TANG L, WANG J, et al. Workspace quality analysis and application for a completely restrained 3-DOF planar cable-driven parallel manipulator[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2013, 27(8): 2391–2399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]HOSTENS I, ANTHONIS J, RAMON H. New design for a 6 DOF vibration simulator with improved reliability and performance[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2005, 19(1): 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]LI B, CAO Y, ZHANG Q, et al. Orientation-singularity representation and orientation-capability computation of a special class of the Gough-Stewart parallel mechanisms using unit quaternion[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 25(6): 1096–1104.Google Scholar
- [4]STAICU S, ZHANG D. Dynamic modeling of a 4-DOF parallel kinematic machine with revolute actuators[J]. International Journal Manufacturing Research, 2008, 3(2): 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]LIU X J, WANG J, ZHENG H J. Optimum design of the 5R symmetrical parallel manipulator with a surrounded and good-condition workspace[J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2006, 54(3): 221–233.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [6]YAO R, TANG X, WANG J, et al. Dimension optimization design of the four-cable driven parallel manipulator in FAST[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2010, 15(6): 932–941.Google Scholar
- [7]TANG X, YAO R. Dimensional design on the six-cable driven parallel manipulator of FAST[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2011, 11: 1–12.Google Scholar
- [8]CECCARELLI M, LANNI C. A multi-objective optimum design of general 3R manipulators for prescribed workspace limits[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2004, 39(2): 119–132.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [9]GAO Z, ZHANG D, GE Y. Design optimization of a spatial six degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator based on artificial intelligence approaches[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2010, 26(2): 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]WANG B, HAN W. Performance atlases of global conditioning index of planar 3-DOF parallel manipulator with accuracy redundancy[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 479–481: 2316–2320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]LIU X J, WANG J, PRITSCHOW G. Performance atlases and optimum design of planar 5R symmetrical parallel mechanisms[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2006, 41(2): 119–144.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [12]GAO F, ZHANG X, ZHAO Y, et al. A physical model of the solution space and the atlases of the reachable workspaces for 2-DOF parallel plane wrists[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1996, 31(2): 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]MERLET J P, GOSSELIN C M, MOULY N. Workspaces of planar parallel manipulators[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1998, 33(1, 2): 7–20.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [14]MERLET J P. Determination of 6D workspaces of Gough-type parallel manipulator and comparison between different geometries[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1999, 18(9): 902–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]MERLET J P. Designing a parallel manipulator for a specific workspace[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1997, 16(4): 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]HAY A M, SNYMAN J A. Methodologies for the optimal design of parallel manipulators[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 59(3): 131–152.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [17]BAI S. Optimum design of spherical parallel manipulators for a prescribed workspace[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2010, 45(2): 200–211.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [18]KLEIN C A, BLAHO B E. Dexterity measures for the design and control of kinematically redundant manipulator[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1997, 6(2): 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]SALISBURY J K, GRAIG J J. Articulated hands: force control and kinematic issues[J]. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1982, 1(1): 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]LIU X J, JIN Z L, GAO F. Optimum design of 3-DOF spherical parallel manipulators with respect to the conditioning and stiffness indices[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2000, 35(9): 1257–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]GAO F, LIU X J, GRUVER W A. Performance evaluation of two degree-of-freedom planar parallel robots[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1998, 33(6): 661–668.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [22]TANG X, SHAO Z. Trajectory planning and tracking control of a multi-level hybrid support manipulator in FAST[J]. Mechatronics, 2013, 23(8): 1113–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]YAO R, ZHU W, HUANG P. Accuracy analysis of Stewart platform based on interval analysis method[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 26(1): 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [24]SHAO Z, TANG X, CHEN X, et al. Research on the inertia matching of the Stewart parallel manipulator[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2012, 28(6): 649–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [25]GOSSELIN C, ANGELES J. Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains[J]. IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation, 1990, 6(3): 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [26]MA O, ANGELS J. Architecture singularities of platform manipulators[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, California, USA, April, 9–11, 1991: 1542–1547.Google Scholar
- [27]MA J, HUANG Q, XIONG H, et al. Analysis and application of the singularity locus of the Stewart platform[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 24(1): 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar