Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.278
Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070.
Amirrudin, M., Nasution, K., & Supahar, S. (2021). Effect of variability on Cronbach alpha reliability in research practice. Journal Matematika, Statistika Dan Komputasi, 17(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v17i2.11655
Baker, L. (1979). Comprehension Monitoring: Identifying and Coping with Text Confusions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11(4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967909547342
Bartholomew, D. J. (1980). Factor analysis for categorical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 42(3), 293–312.
Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reading Motivation as Predictors of Reading Literacy: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020084
Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400030401
Broek, Paul Van Den, & Gustafson, M. (1999). Comprehension and memo for texts: Three generations of reading research. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality and coherence (pp. 15–34).
Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-Denny reading test, forms G and H. Riverside.
Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G., & Topping, K. (2007). Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4), 304–315. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40026882
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307.
Cain, K. E., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5/6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205 nference making ability and its relation to comprehension. Reading and Writing, 11(5/6), 489–503. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/14617/5Cnhttp://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2014). Reading comprehension and vocabulary: Is vocabulary more important for some aspects of comprehension? Annee Psychologique, 114(4), 647–662. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503314004035
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.124
Calloway, R. C. (2019). Why do You Read? Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Reading Comprehension: The Role of Standards of Coherence, Reading Goals, and Interest (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).
Carver, R. P. (1994). Percentage of unknown vocabulary words in text as a function of the relative difficulty of the text: Implications for instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26(7), 413–437.
Chall, J. S. (1987). Reading development in adults. Annals of Dyslexia, 37(1), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648070
Clifton, C., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. Eye Movements, 341–371https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50017-3
Cohen, A. R., Stotland, E., & Wolfe, D. M. (1955). An experimental investigation of need for cognition. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(2), 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042761
Connor, C. M. D., Radach, R., Vorstius, C., Day, S. L., McLean, L., & Morrison, F. J. (2015). Individual Differences in Fifth Graders’ Literacy and Academic Language Predict Comprehension Monitoring Development: An Eye-Movement Study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(2), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.943905
Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., & Kyle, K. (2017). Predicting text comprehension, processing, and familiarity in adult readers: New approaches to readability formulas. Discourse Processes, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1296264
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1994
Currie, N. K., Francey, G., Davies, R., Gray, S., Bridges, M. S., Restrepo, M. A., Thompson, M. S., Ciraolo, M. F., Hu, J., & Cain, K. (2021). The process and product of coherence monitoring in young readers: Effects of reader and text characteristics. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503
Currie, N. K., & Cain, K. (2015). Children’s inference generation: The role of vocabulary and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.005
Dai, D. Y., & Wang, X. (2007). The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.002
Davis, M. H., Tonks, S. M., Hock, M., Wang, W., & Rodriguez, A. (2018). A review of reading motivation scales. Reading Psychology, 39(2), 121–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1400482
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Duff, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Catts, H. (2015). The influence of reading on vocabulary growth: A case for a Matthew effect. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 853–864. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-13-0310
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. American Guidance Service, Inc.
Echols, L. D., West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., & Zehr, K. S. (1996). Using children’s literacy activities to predict growth in verbal cognitive skills: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.526
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272.
Finucci, J. M., Isaacs, S. D., Whitehouse, C. C., & Childs, B. (1982). Empirical validation of reading and spelling quotients. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 24(45), 733–744.
Finucci, J., Whitehouse, C., Isaacs, S., & Childs, B. (1984). Derivation and validation of a quantitative definition of specific reading disability for adults. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 26, 143–153. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1984.tb04425.x/abstract
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
Fulmer, S. M., & Frijters, J. C. (2011). Motivation during an excessively challenging reading task: The buffering role of relative topic interest. Journal of Experimental Education, 79(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.481503
Fulmer, S. M., Mello, S. K. D., Strain, A., & Graesser, A. C. (2015). Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.12.005
Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 3–26). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395.
Guthrie, J. T., & Cox, K. E. (2001). Classroom conditions for motivation and engagement in reading. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016627907001
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 199–205.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., Scafiddi, N. T., & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.2063
Helder, A., Van Leijenhorst, L., & Van den Broek, P. (2016). Coherence monitoring by good and poor comprehenders in elementary school: Comparing offline and online measures. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.008
Henk, W. A., & Melnick, S. A. (1995). The reader self-perception scale (rsps) – a new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves as readers. Reading Teacher, 48(6), 470–482.
Hevey, D., Thomas, K., Pertl, M., Maher, L., Siobhain, A. C., & Chuinneagain, N. (2012). Method effects and the need for cognition scale. In The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment (Vol. 12, Issue 1).
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., & Bureau, J. S. (2017). Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143(12), 1346.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jenkins, J. R., Stein, M. L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 767–787.
Joshi, R. M. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560590949278
Juric, M. (2017). The role of need for cognition in the university students’ reading behaviour. Information Research, 22(1), 1–16.
Kim, Y. S. G., Vorstius, C., & Radach, R. (2018). Does online comprehension monitoring make a unique contribution to reading comprehension in beginning readers? Evidence from eye movements. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(5), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1457680
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.95.2.163
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Lefly, D. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2000). Reliability and validity of the adult reading history questionnaire. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300306
MacGinitie, W. H. MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Riverside Publishing.
Martin-Chang, S. L., & Gould, O. N. (2008). Revisiting print exposure: Exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00371.x
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., & LouwerseMax. (2012). Sources of text difficulty: Across genres and grades. Measuring Up: Advances in How We Assess Reading Ability, January 2012, 89–116.
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., & Butler Songer, N. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background Knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. In Kintsch Source: Cognition and Instruction 14, (1).
Moghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z., & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A Review on the Important Role of Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.300
Moore, M., & Gordon, P. C. (2015). Reading ability and print exposure: Item response theory analysis of the author recognition test. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1095–1109. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0534-3
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 233–253.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(39), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2564
Nation, K. (2017). Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. Npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0004-7
National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups.
O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1123341
O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: a memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1200–1210. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9747530
Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
Parault, S. J., & Williams, H. M. (2009). Reading motivation, reading amount, and text comprehension in deaf and hearing adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enp031
Perfetti, C. A., Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). John Benjamins. http://www.amazon.com/Precursors-Functional-Literacy-Studies-Language/dp/9027218064
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. A. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 67–86). American Psychological Association.
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading and comprehension skills. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook 24(2), 227–253. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000151030.10159.b1
Perfetti, C., & Helder, A. (2021). Incremental comprehension examined in event-related potentials: Word-to-text integration and structure building. Discourse Processes, 58(1), 2–21.
Perfetti, C., & Helder, A. (in press). Progress in reading science: Word identification, comprehension, and universal perspectives. In M. Snowling, C. Hulme, & K. Nation (Eds.), The Science of Reading, A Handbook (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK.
Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H. (2020). How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62(July), 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101899
Revelle, W. (2020). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research (R package version 2.0.12). https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Plant, R. W. (1990). Emotions in nondirected text learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(90)90014-8
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(April), 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Schaffner, E., Schiefele, U., & Ulferts, H. (2013). Reading amount as a mediator of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.52
Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Factorial and construct validity of a new instrument for the assessment of reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.134
Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., Wigfield, A., Nolen, S., & Baker, L. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2007). Dimensions of reading motivation: Development of an adult reading motivation scale. Reading Psychology, 28(5), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710701568991
Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
Soubelet, A., & Salthouse, T. A. (2017). Does need for cognition have the same meaning at different ages? Assessment, 24(8), 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116636449
Stafura, J. Z., & Perfetti, C. A. (2014). Word-to-text integration: Message level and lexical level influences in ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 64C, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.012
Stahl, S. A., Hare, V. C., Sinatra, R., & Gregory, J. F. (1991). Defining the role of prior knowledge and vocabulary in reading comprehension: The retiring of number 41. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23(4), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969109547755
Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208254
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433.
Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.11
Torppa, M., Niemi, P., Vasalampi, K., Lerkkanen, M., Tolvanen, A., & Poikkeus, A. (2020). Leisure reading (but not any kind) and reading comprehension support each other—A longitudinal study across grades 1 and 9. Child Development, 91(3), 876–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13241
Unsworth, N., & McMillan, B. D. (2013). Mind wandering and reading comprehension: Examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 39(3), 832–842. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029669
van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text Relevance and Learning from Text (pp. 123–140). Information Age Publishing.
van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartman, E. (1995). The role of reader’s standards of coherence in generation of inferences during reading. In E. P. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of Coherence in Reading (pp. 353–374). Erlbaum.
van den Broek, P., & Helder, A. (2017). Cognitive processes in discourse comprehension: Passive processes, reader-initiated processes, and evolving mental representations. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1306677
van den Broek, P., Tzeng, Y., Risden, K., Trabasso, T., & Basche, P. (2001). Inferential questioning: Effects on comprehension of narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0618.104.22.1681
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
Veiga, F. H. (2016). Assessing Student Engagement in School: Development and Validation of a Four-dimensional Scale. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217(351), 813–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.153
Veiga, F. H., Reeve, J., Wentzel, K., & Robu, V. (2014). Assessing students’ engagement: A review of instruments with psychometric Qualities. Envolvimento Dos Alunos Na Escola: Perspetivas Internacionais Da Psicologia e Educação / Students’ Engagement in School: International Perspectives of Psychology and Education, 38–57. http://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/18036
Wagoner, S. A. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: What is it and what we know about it. Reading REsearch Quarterly, 18(3), 328–346. https://www.jstor.org/stable/747392
Wang, J. H., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186.
Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. R., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12184
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1995). Dimensions of Children’s Motivations for Reading: An Initial Study. Reading Research Report No. 34. Reading Research Report No. 34, 9–33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED384010.pdf
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.1240
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (3rd ed.) 403–422. Longman.
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20307
Yeari, M., Van Den Broek, P., & Oudega, M. (2015). Processing and memory of central versus peripheral information as a function of reading goals : Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 28, 1071–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9561-4
Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1992). Effects of passage type on comprehension monitoring and recall in good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(3), 373–391.
Zentall, S. S., & Lee, J. (2012). A reading motivation intervention with differential outcomes for students at risk for reading disabilities, ADHD, and typical comparisons: Clever is and clever does. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(4), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712438556