Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, R. H. (2015a). Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv: 1506.04967 [stat.ME].
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S., (2015b). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5, e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.
Chen, L.K., & Carr, H.A. (1926). The ability of Chinese students to read in vertical and horizontal directions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 110–117.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.
Cop, U., Dirix, N., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W. (2017). Presenting GECO: An eye tracking corpus of monolingual and bilingual sentence reading. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 602–615. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0734-0
Dann, K. M., Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2021). Morphological preview effects in English are restricted to suffixed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001029
Ehrlich, S.F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90220-6
Engbert, R. & Kliegl, R. (2001). Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: A possible role for autonomous saccades. Biological Cybernetics, 85, 77-87.
Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43, 1035-1045.
Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621–636.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813.
Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211502
Findlay, J.M., & Gilchrist, I.D. (2003). Active vision: the psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford University Press.
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417–429
Hohenstein, S., Matuschek, H., & Kliegl, R. (2017). Linked linear mixed models: A joint analysis of fixation locations and fixation durations in natural reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 637–651.
Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. LEA.
Hoosain, R. (1992). The psychological reality of the word in Chinese. Advances in Psychology, 90, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61889-0.
Husain, S., Vasishth, S., & Srinivasan, N. (2014). Integration and prediction difficulty in Hindi sentence comprehension: Evidence from an eye-tracking corpus. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.2.3
Hyönä, J., Heikkilä, T. T., Vainio, S., & Kliegl, R. (2021). Parafoveal access to word stem during reading: An eye movement study. Cognition, 208, 104547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104547
Inhoff, A.W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-15126.96.36.199
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431–439.
Inhoff, A.W., & Wu, C. (2005). Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1345-1356.
Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Starr, M., & Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 221-246). Elsevier.
Institute of Linguistic Studies. (1986). Modern Chinese word frequency dictionary. Beijing Language Institute Publisher. (in Chinese).
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037
Kennedy, A., Hill, R., & Pynte, J. (2003). The Dundee Corpus. Paper presented at the 12th European Conference on Eye Movement, Dundee, Scotland.
Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., Murray, W.S., & Paul, S.A. (2013). Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: An eye movement analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 601–618
Kliegl, R. (2007). Towards a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, & Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 530-537.
Kliegl, R. (2014, May). Towards a joint analysis of fixation location and duration during reading of Chinese sentences. Paper presented at the 6th China International Conference on Eye Movements, Beijing, China.
Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262-284.
Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135,13-35.
Kumle, L., Võ, M.LH., & Draschkow, D. (2021). Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0
Laurinavichyute, A.K., Sekerina, I.A., Alexeeva, S., Bagdasaryan, K., & Kliegl, R. (2019). Russian Sentence Corpus: Benchmark measures of eye movements in reading in Russian. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1051-6
Lavigne, F., Vitu, F., & d’Ydevalle, G., (2000). The influence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words. Acta Psychologica, 104, 191-214.
Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51, 1146–1156.
Li, X., Bicknell, K., Liu, P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: a systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 895-913. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033580
Liu, Y., Reichle, E.D., & Li, X. (2015). Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 41, 1229–1236.
Luke, S.G., & Christianson, K. (2016). Limits on lexical prediction during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 22–60.
Luke, S.G., & Christianson, K. (2018). The Provo Corpus: A large eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 826–833. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0908-4
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001.
McConkie, G.W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203972
McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 245–253.
McConkie, G.W., Kerr, P.W., Reddix, M.D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A.M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245–253.
McDonald, S.A., Carpenter, R.H.S., & Shillcock, R.C. (2005). An anatomically-constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 112, 814-840.
O’Regan, J.K., & Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye-movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In: M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance. The psychology of reading (Vol. 12, pp. 363–383). Erlbaum.
O'Regan, K. (1979). Saccade size control during reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 501-509.
O'Regan, J.K. (1980). The control of saccade size and fixation duration during reading: The limits of linguistic control. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 112-117.
Özkan, A., Fikri, F., Kırkıcı, B., Kliegl, R., & Acartürk, C. (2021). Eye movement control in Turkish sentence reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820963310
Pan, J., Yan, M., & Laubrock, J. (2017). Perceptual span in oral reading: The case of Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 254-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1283694
Peng, D.L., Orchard, L.N., & Stern, J.A. (1983) Evaluation of eye movement variables of Chinese and American readers. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 18, 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03001861
Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 21–30.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
Rayner, K., & Well, A.D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504–509. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214555
Rayner, K., Binder, K.S., Ashby, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading: Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41, 943–954.
Rayner, K., Reichle, E.D., Stroud, M.J., Williams, C.C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-79188.8.131.528.
Rayner, K., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2007a). Extending the E-Z Reader model of eye movement control to Chinese readers. Cognitive Science, 31, 1021–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701703824
Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Slattery, T.J., & Reichle, E.D. (2007b). Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 520–529.
Reichle, E.D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D.L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157.
Reichle, E.D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403–4411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00152-2
Richter, E., Yan, M., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2010, May). Modeling Chinese reading with SWIFT: How does word segmentation affect targeting? Paper presented at the 4th China International Conference on Eye Movements, Tianjin, China. Summary available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VXFYM
Risse, S., Hohenstein, S., Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2014). A theoretical analysis of the perceptual span based on SWIFT simulations of the n+2 boundary paradigm. Visual Cognition, 22, 283-308.
Schad, D.J. & Engbert, R. (2012). The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model. Visual Cognition, 20, 391-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2012.670143
Schilling, H.E.H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J.I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.
Shen, E. (1927). An analysis of eye movements in the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075609
Sun, F., Morita, M., & Stark, L.W. (1985). Comparative patterns of reading eye movement in Chinese and English. Perception & Psychophysics 37, 502–506. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204913
Taylor, W.L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415–433.
Tsai, J.L., & McConkie, G.W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes? In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 159-176). Elsevier.
Tsai, J., Lee, C., Tzeng, O.J.L., Hung, D.L., & Yen, N. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain and Language, 91, 235–244.
Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2012). Eye movement control in reading: Logographic Chinese versus alphabetic scripts. PsyCh Journal, 1, 128-142.
Vainio, S., Hyönä, J., & Pajunen, A. (2009). Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading. Experimental Psychology, 56, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3184.108.40.206
Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2016). CarPrice versus CarpRice: Word boundary ambiguity influences saccade target selection during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 42, 1832-1838. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000276
Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E.M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903114858.
Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., Yusupu, R., Miao, D., Krugel, A., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Eye movements guided by morphological structure: Evidence from the Uighur language. Cognition, 132, 181-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.008
Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038097
Yan, M., Pan, J., Chang, W., & Kliegl, R. (2019a). Read sideways or not: Vertical saccade advantage in sentence reading. Reading and Writing, 32, 1911-1926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9930-x
Yan, M., Pan, J., & Kliegl, R. (2019b). Eye movements control in Chinese reading: A cross-sectional study. Developmental Psychology, 55, 2275–2285. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000819yan.
Yang, H.-M., & McConkie, G.W. (1999). Reading Chinese: Some basic eye-movement characteristics. In J. Wang, A.W. Inhoff, and H-C. Chen (Eds), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 207-222). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G.W. (2004). Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 226-261.
Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 1192–1204.
Yen, M.-H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O., Hung, D., & Tsai, J.-L. (2009). Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences. Acta Psychologica, 131, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.005
Yen, M.-H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O., & Tsai, J.-L. (2012). Usage of statistical cues for word boundary in reading Chinese sentences. Reading & Writing, 25, 1007-1025.
Zhou, W., Wang, A., Shu, H., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2018). Word segmentation by alternating colors facilitates eye guidance in Chinese reading. Memory & Cognition, 46, 729–740. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0797-5.