Table 9 Comparison to alternative datasets – the Antoniou et al. (2016) dataset
From: The executive function of bilingual and monolingual children: A technical efficiency approach
Panel A: Sample 1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bilectals (n = 17) | Monolinguals (n = 25) | |||||||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F-statistic | ||||
Working memory | 0.039 | 0.653 | – 0.289 | 0.763 | 2.960* | |||
Inhibition | 0.123 | 0.730 | – 0.098 | 0.557 | 1.140 | |||
Technical Efficiency | 0.988 | 0.031 | 0.955 | 0.057 | 3.120* | |||
t-test | 2.121** | |||||||
Panel B: Sample 2 | ||||||||
Bilectals (n = 44) | Multilinguals (n = 26) | Monolinguals (n = 25) | ||||||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F-statistic | ||
Working memory | – 0.033 | 0.712 | 0.208 | 0.658 | – 0.289 | 0.763 | 2.630* | |
Inhibition | 0.126 | 0.561 | 0.198 | 0.465 | – 0.098 | 0.557 | 1.640 | |
Technical Efficiency | 0.950 | 0.090 | 0.979 | 0.035 | 0.896 | 0.091 | 7.010*** | |
t-statistic | 2.401** | 4.308*** | ||||||
Panel C: Sample 3 | ||||||||
Bilectals (n = 64) | Multilinguals (n = 47) | Monolinguals (n = 25) | ||||||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F-statistic | ||
Working memory | – 0.027 | 0.800 | 0.036 | 0.882 | – 0.289 | 0.763 | 1.060 | |
Inhibition | 0.021 | 0.622 | – 0.004 | 0.675 | – 0.098 | 0.557 | 0.620 | |
Technical Efficiency | 0.950 | 0.089 | 0.949 | 0.146 | 0.842 | 0.124 | 6.100*** | |
t-statistic | 4.595*** | 3.118*** | ||||||