Correction to: Validating mouse-tracking: How design factors influence action dynamics in intertemporal decision making

The Original Article was published on 25 January 2019

Correction to: Behav Res

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1179-4

Fig. 1 from this article had been adapted from previous work for which the following reference was omitted:

Wulff, D. U., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Kieslich, P. J., Henninger, F., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2018, March). Advanced mouse- and handtracking analysis: Detecting and visualising clusters in movement trajectories. Paper presented at the 60. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen (Conference of Experimental Psychologists), Marburg, Germany. See also Wulff et al. (2019). Wulff, D. U., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Kieslich, P. J., Henninger, F., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Detecting types in movement trajectories. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A. Kühberger, & J. G. Johnson (Eds.), A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Schoemann.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1179-4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schoemann, M., Lüken, M., Grage, T. et al. Correction to: Validating mouse-tracking: How design factors influence action dynamics in intertemporal decision making. Behav Res 52, 446 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01306-1

Download citation