Lisbon Emoji and Emoticon Database (LEED): Norms for emoji and emoticons in seven evaluative dimensions

  • David Rodrigues
  • Marília Prada
  • Rui Gaspar
  • Margarida V. Garrido
  • Diniz Lopes

DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0878-6

Cite this article as:
Rodrigues, D., Prada, M., Gaspar, R. et al. Behav Res (2017). doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0878-6


The use of emoticons and emoji is increasingly popular across a variety of new platforms of online communication. They have also become popular as stimulus materials in scientific research. However, the assumption that emoji/emoticon users’ interpretations always correspond to the developers’/researchers’ intended meanings might be misleading. This article presents subjective norms of emoji and emoticons provided by everyday users. The Lisbon Emoji and Emoticon Database (LEED) comprises 238 stimuli: 85 emoticons and 153 emoji (collected from iOS, Android, Facebook, and Emojipedia). The sample included 505 Portuguese participants recruited online. Each participant evaluated a random subset of 20 stimuli for seven dimensions: aesthetic appeal, familiarity, visual complexity, concreteness, valence, arousal, and meaningfulness. Participants were additionally asked to attribute a meaning to each stimulus. The norms obtained include quantitative descriptive results (means, standard deviations, and confidence intervals) and a meaning analysis for each stimulus. We also examined the correlations between the dimensions and tested for differences between emoticons and emoji, as well as between the two major operating systems—Android and iOS. The LEED constitutes a readily available normative database (available at with potential applications to different research domains.


LEED Emoticons Emoji Aesthetic appeal Familiarity Visual complexity Concreteness Valence Arousal Meaningfulness Meaning analysis Normative ratings Android iOS Facebook ICTs 

Supplementary material

13428_2017_878_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (309 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 308 kb)

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social and Organizational PsychologyInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IULLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.GoldsmithsUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.William James Center for ResearchISPA - Instituto UniversitáriovLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations