Skip to main content

Ostracism Online: A social media ostracism paradigm

Abstract

We describe Ostracism Online, a novel, social media–based ostracism paradigm designed to (1) keep social interaction experimentally controlled, (2) provide researchers with the flexibility to manipulate the properties of the social situation to fit their research purposes, (3) be suitable for online data collection, (4) be convenient for studying subsequent within-group behavior, and (5) be ecologically valid. After collecting data online, we compared the Ostracism Online paradigm with the Cyberball paradigm (Williams & Jarvis Behavior Research Methods, 38, 174–180, 2006) on need-threat and mood questionnaire scores (van Beest & Williams Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91, 918–928, 2006). We also examined whether ostracized targets of either paradigm would be more likely to conform to their group members than if they had been included. Using a Bayesian analysis of variance to examine the individual effects of the different paradigms and to compare these effects across paradigms, we found analogous effects on need-threat and mood. Perhaps because we examined conformity to the ostracizers (rather than neutral sources), neither paradigm showed effects of ostracism on conformity. We conclude that Ostracism Online is a cost-effective, easy to use, and ecologically valid research tool for studying the psychological and behavioral effects of ostracism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. Using the nontransformed data in the model did not change the results meaningfully.

References

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M. J., Sacco, D. F., Brown, C. M., Young, S. G., & Claypool, H. M. (2010). A preference for genuine smiles following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 196–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, J. (2013). The demographics of social media users—2012. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail.aspx

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter-Sowell, A. R., Chen, Z., & Williams, K. D. (2008). Ostracism increases social susceptibility. Social Influence, 3, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23, 525–535. doi:10.1080/10304310903003270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., & Rouby, D. A. (2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: Selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 729–741. doi:10.1037/a0014634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science. 302(5643), 290–292.

  • French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, L. A. (1963). Kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2000). Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 486–496. doi:10.1177/0146167200266007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. (2005). Analysis of variance? Why it is more important than ever. The Annals of Statistics, 33, 1–53. doi:10.1214/009053604000001048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. (2006). Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, S. A., Williams, K. D., & Carter-Sowell, A. R. (2010). The psychological sting of stigma: The costs of attributing ostracism to racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 612–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, K. N., & Goulet, L. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail.aspx

  • IJzerman, H., Gallucci, M., Pouw, W. T. J. L., Weißgerber, S. C., van Doesum, N. J., & Williams, K. D. (2012). Cold-blooded loneliness: Social exclusion leads to lower skin temperature. Acta Psychologica, 140, 283–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (2010). Need-threat can motivate performance after ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 690–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292–314. doi:10.1177/1745691610369469

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the conduct of research on the Internet. The American Psychologist, 59, 105–117. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kross, E., Bergman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E. E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275.

  • Kruschke, J. K. (2010). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R and BUGS. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezlek, J. B., Kowalski, R. M., Leary, M. R., Blevins, T., & Holgate, S. (1997). Personality moderators of reactions to interpersonal rejection: Depression and trait self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1235–1244. doi:10.1177/01461672972312001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen. (2012). State of the media: The social media report 2012. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/reports/2013.html?tag=Category:Online

  • Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, C. L., Gardner, W. L., & Knowles, M. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095–1107. doi:10.1177/0146167203262085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riva, G. (2002). The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: The present and future of technology-based interactions. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5, 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riva, P., Williams, K. D., Torstrick, A., & Montali, L. (2014). Orders to shoot (a camera): Effects of ostracism on obedience. Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 208–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, D., Wirth, J. H., Hugenberg, K., Chen, Z., & Williams, K. D. (2011). The world in black and white: Ostracism enhances the categorical perception of social information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 836–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skitka, L. J., & Sargis, E. G. (2006). The Internet as psychological laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 529–555. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Williams, K. D. (2004). R U There? Ostracism by cell phone text messages. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 291–301. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.4.291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058–1069. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beest, I., & Williams, K. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 918–928. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D. (2007a). Ostracism: The kiss of social death. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D. (2007b). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 275–314). Burlington: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., Govan, C. L., Croker, V., Tynan, D., Cruickshank, M., & Lam, A. (2002). Investigations into differences between social and cyber ostracism. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice, 6, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., & Jarvis, B. (2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 174–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 693–706. doi:10.1177/0146167297237003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., & Wesselmann, E. D. (2011). Ostracism in Cyberspace: Being ignored and excluded in electronic-based interactions. In Z. Birchmeier, B. Dietz-Uhler, & G. Stasser (Eds.), Strategic use of technology (pp. 127–144). New York: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, C. B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19, 838–842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wouter Wolf or Ana Levordashka.

Additional information

The Ostracism Online paradigm: http://dx.doi.org/http://smpo.github.io/socialmedia/

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 93 kb)

ESM 2

(PNG 81 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolf, W., Levordashka, A., Ruff, J.R. et al. Ostracism Online: A social media ostracism paradigm. Behav Res 47, 361–373 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0475-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0475-x

Keywords

  • Ostracism
  • Rejection
  • Exclusion
  • Social media