Behavior Research Methods

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 206–214 | Cite as

Need to train your rat? There is an App for that: A touchscreen behavioral evaluation system

  • Joshua E. Wolf
  • Catherine M. Urbano
  • Chad M. Ruprecht
  • Kenneth J. Leising
Article

Abstract

The increasing demand for highly automated and flexible tasks capable of assessing visual learning and memory in nonhuman animals has led to the exciting development of a wide array of prefabricated touchscreen-equipped systems. However, the high cost of these prefabricated systems has led many researchers to develop or modify their own preexisting equipment. We developed a freely downloadable App, the Touchscreeen Behavioral Evaluation System (TBES) for use in conjunction with an iPad (Apple, Cupertino, California) as an alternative to prefabricated touchscreen systems. TBES allows for stimulus presentation and data collection on an iPad. The touchscreen technology offered by the iPad is attractive to researchers due to its affordability, reliability, and resistance to false inputs. We highlight these, as well as the feasibility and procedural flexibility of TBES, in an effort to promote our system as a competitive alternative to those currently available.

Keywords

Visual discrimination IPad Touchscreen Operant chamber 

References

  1. Allan, R. W. (1992). Technologies to reliably transduce the topographical details of pigeons’ pecks. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 24, 150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blough, D. S. (1986). Odd-item search by pigeons: Method, instrumentation, and uses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 18, 413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. M. (1968). Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s keypeck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 1–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bussey, T. J., Muir, J. L., & Robbins, T. W. (1994). A novel automated touchscreen procedure for assessing learning in the rat using computer graphic stimuli. Neuroscience Research Communications, 15, 103–110.Google Scholar
  5. Cook, R. G., Geller, A. I., Zhang, G. R., & Gowda, R. (2004). Touchscreen-enhanced visual learning in rats. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elsmore, T. F., Parkinson, J. K., & Mellgren, R. L. (1989). Video touchscreen stimulus response surface for use with primates. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(1), 60–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geist, E. (2011). The game changer: Using iPads in college teacher education classes. College Student Journal, 45, 758–768.Google Scholar
  8. Gibson, B. M., Wasserman, E. A., Frei, L., & Miller, K. (2004). Recent advances in operant conditioning technology: A versatile and affordable computerized touchscreen system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leising, K. J. (2013). Touchscreen-equipped Behavioral Evaluation System Server (TBES VB6, V3.0) [Visual Basic 6.0 application]. Executable and source code retrieved from http://touchscreenbehavioralevaluationsystem.com. Accessed 25 May 2013
  10. Leising, K. J., Garlick, D., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2011). Overshadowing by proximity with pigeons in an automated open-field and touch screen. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior, 37(4), 488–494.Google Scholar
  11. Leising, K. J., Sawa, K., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2012). Factors that influence negative summation in a spatial-search task with pigeons. Behavioral Processes, 90(3), 357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leising, K. J., Wolf, J. E., & Ruprecht, C. M. (2013). Visual Discrimination Learning With an iPad-Equipped Apparatus. Behavioral Processes, 93, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Markham, M. R., Butt, A. E., & Dougher, M. J. (1996). A computer touch-screen apparatus for training visual discriminations in rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 173–182.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nevin, J. A. (1967). Effects of reinforcement scheduling on simultaneous discrimination performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10(3), 251–260.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Olton, D. S. (1979). Mazes, maps, and memory. American Psychologist, 34, 583–596.Google Scholar
  16. Pisacreta, R., & Rilling, M. (1987). Infrared touch technology as a response detector in animal research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 19, 389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sahgel, A., & Steckler, T. (1994). Touch Windows and operant behavior in rats. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 55(1), 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  19. Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spetch, M. L., Cheng, K., & Mondoch, M. V. (1992). Landmark use by pigeons in a touch-screen spatial search task. Animal Learning and Behavior, 20(3), 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Urbano, C. M., Westfall, D., & Leising, K. J. (2013). Touchscreen-equipped Behavioral Evaluation System (TBES, V1.1) [iPad application software]. App retrieved from http://itunes.apple.com. Source code retrieved from https://github.com/tcu/tbes. Accessed 25 May 2013
  22. Wright, A. A., Cook, R. G., Rivera, J. J., Sands, S. F., & Delius, J. D. (1988). Concept learning by pigeons: Matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli. Animal Learning and Behavior, 16, 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua E. Wolf
    • 1
  • Catherine M. Urbano
    • 1
  • Chad M. Ruprecht
    • 1
  • Kenneth J. Leising
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA

Personalised recommendations