Skip to main content

Pay attention and you might miss it: Greater learning during attentional lapses

Abstract

Attentional lapses have been found to impair everything from basic perception to learning and memory. Yet, despite the well-documented costs of lapses on cognition, recent work suggests that lapses might unexpectedly confer some benefits. One potential benefit is that lapses broaden our learning to integrate seemingly irrelevant content that could later prove useful—a benefit that prior research focusing only on goal-relevant memory would miss. Here, we measure how fluctuations in sustained attention influence the learning of seemingly goal-irrelevant content that competes for attention with target content. Participants completed a correlated flanker task in which they categorized central targets (letters or numbers) while ignoring peripheral flanking symbols that shared hidden probabilistic relationships with the targets. We found that across participants, higher rates of attentional lapses correlated with greater learning of the target–flanker relationships. Moreover, within participants, learning was more evident during attentional lapses. These findings address long-standing theoretical debates and reveal a benefit of attentional lapses: they expand the scope of learning and decisions beyond the strictly relevant.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Amer, T., Campbell, K. L., & Hasher, L. (2016). Cognitive Control As a Double-Edged Sword. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(12), 905–915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amer, T., & Hasher, L. (2014). Conceptual Processing of Distractors by Older but Not Younger Adults. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2252–2258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ariga, A., & Lleras, A. (2011). Brief and rare mental “breaks” keep you focused: Deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements. Cognition, 118(3), 439–443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Awh, E., Vogel, E. K., Hammer, R., Diesendruck, G., Weinshall, D., Hochstein, S., et al. (2008). The bouncer in the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 11(1), 749–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biss, R. K., Rowe, G., Weeks, J. C., Hasher, L., & Murphy, K. J. (2018). Leveraging older adults’ susceptibility to distraction to improve memory for face-name associations. Psychology and Aging, 33(1), 158–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. L., Hasher, L., & Thomas, R. C. (2010). Hyper-Binding. Psychological Science, 21(3), 399–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. L., Healey, M. K., Lee, M. M. S., Zimerman, S., & Hasher, L. (2012). Brief report: Age differences in visual statistical learning. Psychology and Aging, 27(3), 650–656.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, K. A., & Flowers, J. H. (1996). Intentional versus unintentional use of contingencies between perceptual events. Percept Psychophys, 58(3), 460–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Champely, S. (2020). pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=pwr. Accessed 19 Nov 2020.

  • Cools, R., Sheridan, M., Jacobs, E., & D’Esposito, M. (2007). Impulsive personality predicts dopamine-dependent changes in frontostriatal activity during component processes of working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(20), 5506–5514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curran-Everett, D. (2017). CORP: Minimizing the chances of false positives and false negatives. Journal of Applied Physiology, 122(1), 91–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • deBettencourt, M. T., Keene, P. A., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2019). Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0606-6

  • DeBettencourt, M. T., Norman, K. A., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2018). Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(2), 605–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, A., Finn, A., & Duncan, K. (2020). Errors lead to transient impairments in memory formation. Cognition, 204, 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, A. L., & Duncan, K. (2020). Acetylcholine and the complex interdependence of memory and attention. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 32, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, W., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2016). Selective attention, diffused attention, and the development of categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 91, 24–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, K., Semmler, A., & Shohamy, D. (2019). Modulating the Use of Multiple Memory Systems in Value-based Decisions with Contextual Novelty. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(10), 1455–1467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esterman, M., Noonan, S. K., Rosenberg, M., & Degutis, J. (2012). In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. Cerebral Cortex, 23(11), 2712–2723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esterman, M., Rosenberg, M. D., & Noonan, S. K. (2014). Intrinsic fluctuations in sustained attention and distractor processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(5), 1724–1730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esterman, M., & Rothlein, D. (2019). Models of sustained attention. Current Opinion in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.005

  • Foerde, K., Knowlton, B. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(31), 11778–11783.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Foerde, K., Poldrack, R. A., & Knowlton, B. J. (2007). Secondary-task effects on classification learning. Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 864–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortenbaugh, F. C., Degutis, J., & Esterman, M. (2017). Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1396, 70–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 87–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalra, P. B., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Finn, A. S. (2019). Evidence of stable individual differences in implicit learning. Cognition, 190(May), 199–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Aging and a benefit of distractibility. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(2), 301–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, L. I., Schneider, D., Schubert, A. L., Hanenberg, C., Lewald, J., Wascher, E., & Getzmann, S. (2019). Unraveling the relation between eeg correlates of attentional orienting and sound localization performance: A diffusion model approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(5), 945–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, A. N., Elwan, D., Holtz, S., & Prinzmetal, W. (2012). Voluntary and involuntary attention vary as a function of impulsivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 405–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and Inhibitory Control. Psychological Science, 8(1), 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth, N. H. (1948). The Breakdown of Vigilance during Prolonged Visual Search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(1), 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madore, K. P., Khazenzon, A. M., Backes, C. W., Jiang, J., Uncapher, M. R., Norcia, A. M., & Wagner, A. D. (2020). Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking. Nature, 587(7832), 87–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, T., Robertson, I. H., Galloway, M., & Hawkins, K. (1999). The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia, 37(6), 661–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McVay, J. C., Kane, M. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2009). Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(5), 857–863.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters. Perception And Psychophysics, 41(5), 419–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittner, M., Hawkins, G. E., Boekel, W., & Forstmann, B. U. (2016). A Neural Model of Mind Wandering. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 570–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for. Psychology, 4(2), 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C. E., Shohamy, D., Gluck, M. A., Grossman, S., Onlaor, S., & Kapur, N. (2003). Dissociating medial temporal and basal ganglia memory systems with a latent learning task. Neuropsychologia, 41(14), 1919–1928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, K. W. J., Biss, R. K., & Hasher, L. (2018). Time of day effects on the use of distraction to minimise forgetting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(11), 2334–2341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy-Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Per, B., Bojesen, R. H., & Version, D. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

  • Plebanek, D. J., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2017). Costs of Selective Attention: When Children Notice What Adults Miss. Psychological Science, 28(6), 723–732.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A., Clark, J., Pare-Blagoev, E., Shohamy, D., Moyano, J. C., Myers, C., et al. (2001). Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature, 414(6863), 546–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 19 Nov 2022.

  • Riley, E., Esterman, M., Fortenbaugh, F. C., & DeGutis, J. (2017). Time-of-day variation in sustained attentional control. Chronobiology International, 34(7), 993–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). `Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35(6), 747–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M., Noonan, S., DeGutis, J., & Esterman, M. (2013). Sustaining visual attention in the face of distraction: A novel gradual-onset continuous performance task. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 75(3), 426–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G., Valderrama, S., Hasher, L., & Lenartowicz, A. (2006). Attentional disregulation: A benefit for implicit memory. Psychology and Aging, 21(4), 826–830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, T. D., Ruparel, K., Loughead, J., Elliott, M. A., Gerraty, R. T., Calkins, M. E., et al. (2012). Being right is its own reward: Load and performance related ventral striatum activation to correct responses during a working memory task in youth. NeuroImage, 61(3), 723–729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., & Tulving, E. (Eds.). (1994). Memory systems 1994. Memory systems 1994. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, T. W., Cheng, F. H. T., & De Rosa, E. (2010). Failing to ignore: Paradoxical neural effects of perceptual load on early attentional selection in normal aging. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(44), 14750–14758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 319–326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seli, P., Beaty, R. E., Cheyne, J. A., Smilek, D., Oakman, J., & Schacter, D. L. (2018). How pervasive is mind wandering, really? Consciousness and Cognition, 66(May), 74–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, D., Myers, C. E., Hopkins, R. O., Sage, J., & Gluck, M. A. (2009). Distinct hippocampal and basal ganglia contributions to probabilistic learning and reversal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(9), 1821–1833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shomstein, S., Malcolm, G. L., & Nah, J. C. (2019). Intrusive effects of task-irrelevant information on visual selective attention: Semantics and size. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 153–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J. (2010). Why the Global Availability of Mind Wandering Necessitates Resource Competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, M. L., Whitehead, P. S., Marsh, E. J., & Seli, P. (2022). Prior exposure increases judged truth even during periods of mind wandering. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02101-4

  • Sun, M., Wang, E., Huang, J., Zhao, C., Guo, J., Li, D., et al. (2018). Attentional selection and suppression in children and adults. Developmental Science, 21(6), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2009). Cognition without control: When a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 259–263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, D. R., Besner, D., & Smilek, D. (2015). A Resource-Control Account of Sustained Attention: Evidence from Mind-Wandering and Vigilance Paradigms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 82–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2014). Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 1–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Heitz, R. P., Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17(6), 635–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. K. (2016). The influence of lapses of attention on working memory capacity. Memory and Cognition, 44(2), 188–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. K. (2018). Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(4), 638–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. K. (2020). Working memory capacity and sustained attention: A cognitive-energetic perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 46(1), 77–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. D., Maril, A., & Schacter, D. L. (2000). Interactions Between Forms of Memory: When Priming Hinders New Episodic Learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(supplement 2), 52–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wamsley, E. J., & Summer, T. (2020). Spontaneous Entry into an “Offline” State during Wakefulness: A Mechanism of Memory Consolidation? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01587

  • Weeks, J. C., Biss, R. K., Murphy, K. J., & Hasher, L. (2016). Face–name learning in older adults: A benefit of hyper-binding. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(5), 1559–1565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Henrique Matulis for assistance programming the experiment, and Kiara Lu, Theresa Pham, Danielle Lim, Noel Yuen, Lavania Jeganathan, Christa Shi, and Luosha Ha for their help with data collection. This research was supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship and an Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) graduate fellowship to M.D., an Ontario Graduate Scholarship and Brain Canada Kids Brain Network Scholarship to A.D., NSERC Discovery Grants (A.S.F.:RGPIN-2016-05; KD:RGPIN/05582-201) and Canada Foundation for Innovation and Ontario Research Foundation (A.S.F.: 34947; K.D.:34479).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.D., A.D., K.D., and A.S.F. designed research; M.D. performed the research. A.D. and M.D. analyzed data; M.D., A.D., K.D., and A.S.F. wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alexandra Decker or Michael Dubois.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Open Practices Statements

The datasets and code generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available at the following link:

https://github.com/alexandradecker/learning-more-when-attending-less.git. The stimuli and experiment code can be found at this link: https://github.com/FinnLandLab/learning-more-when-attending-less. The experiment was not pre-registered.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 518 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Decker, A., Dubois, M., Duncan, K. et al. Pay attention and you might miss it: Greater learning during attentional lapses. Psychon Bull Rev 30, 1041–1052 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02226-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02226-6

Keywords