Does visuomotor adaptation contribute to illusion-resistant grasping?
Do illusory distortions of perceived object size influence how wide the hand is opened during a grasping movement? Many studies on this question have reported illusion-resistant grasping, but this finding has been contradicted by other studies showing that grasping movements and perceptual judgments are equally susceptible. One largely unexplored explanation for these contradictions is that illusion effects on grasping can be reduced with repeated movements. Using a visuomotor adaptation paradigm, we investigated whether an adaptation model could predict the time course of Ponzo illusion effects on grasping. Participants performed a series of trials in which they viewed a thin wooden target, manually reported an estimate of the target’s length, then reached to grasp the target. Manual size estimates (MSEs) were clearly biased by the illusion, but maximum grip apertures (MGAs) of grasping movements were consistently accurate. Illusion-resistant MGAs were observed immediately upon presentation of the illusion, so there was no decrement in susceptibility for the adaptation model to explain. To determine whether online corrections based on visual feedback could have produced illusion-resistant MGAs, we performed an exploratory post hoc analysis of movement trajectories. Early portions of the illusion effect profile evolved as if they were biased by the illusion to the same magnitude as the perceptual responses (MSEs), but this bias was attenuated prior to the MGA. Overall, this preregistered study demonstrated that visuomotor adaptation of grasping is not the primary source of illusion resistance in closed-loop grasping.
KeywordsReach-to-grasp Manual size estimation Ponzo illusion Visuomotor adaptation
- Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (1996). Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object. Experimental Brain Research, 11, 473–476.Google Scholar
- Bruno, N., & Franz, V. H. (2009). When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion?: A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1421–1433.Google Scholar
- Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science. An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Elliott, D., & Lyons, J. (1998). Optimizing the use of vision during motor skill acquisition. in J. P. Piek (Ed.), Motor behavior and human skill: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 57–72). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L., White, C. W., & Allyn, M. R. (1968). Eye movements and decrement in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 376–382.Google Scholar
- Franz, V. H. (2003). Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception? Experimental Brain Research, 151(4), 471–477.Google Scholar
- Franz, V. H. (2007). Ratios: A short guide to confidence limits and proper use. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/0710.2024v1.pdf
- Franz, V. H., Fahle, M., Bülthoff, H. H., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2001). Effects of visual illusions on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27(3), 1124–1144.Google Scholar
- Gonzalez, C. L. R., Ganel, T., Whitwell, R. L., Morrissey, B., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: Sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand. Neuropsychologia, 46, 624–631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. In N. F. Mott, E. C. Bullard, & D. H. Wilkinson (Eds.), The international series of monographs on physics (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. G. (n.d.). The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://ab-initio.mit.edu/nlopt
- Lewis, E. O. (1908). The effect of practice on the perception of the Müller–Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 2, 294–306.Google Scholar
- Vishton, P. M., Rea, J. G., Cutting, J. E., & Nuñez, L. N. (1999). Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1659–1672.PubMedGoogle Scholar