Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 431–439 | Cite as

Influences of speech familiarity on immediate perception and final comprehension

  • Lynn K. Perry
  • Emily N. Mech
  • Maryellen C. MacDonald
  • Mark S. Seidenberg
Brief Report


Unfamiliar speech—spoken in a familiar language but with an accent different from the listener’s—is known to increase comprehension difficulty. However, there is evidence of listeners’ rapid adaptation to unfamiliar accents (although perhaps not to the level of familiar accents). This paradox might emerge from prior focus on isolated word perception and/or use of single comprehension measures. We investigated processing of fluent connected speech spoken either in a familiar or unfamiliar accent, using participants’ ability to “shadow” the speech as an immediate measure as well as a comprehension test at passage end. Shadowing latencies and errors and comprehension errors increased for Unfamiliar relative to Familiar Speech conditions, especially for relatively informal rather than more academic content. Additionally, there was evidence of less adaptation to Unfamiliar than Familiar Speech. These results suggest that unfamiliar speech imposes costs, especially in the immediate timescale of perceiving speech.


Speech perception Accented speech Speech shadowing Listening comprehension 



This study was supported by NICHD R24D075454. The authors thank the participants and Sarah Isaak and Yannan Gao for help in data collection and coding.


  1. Adank, P., Evans, B. G., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 520–529. doi: 10.1037/a0013552 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Babel, M. (2010). Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 39(4), 437–456. doi: 10.1017/S0047404510000400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casasanto, L. S. (2008). Does social information influence sentence processing? Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, BC Love, K McRae, VM Sloutsky, 799–804.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Acoustical Society of America, 116. Retrieved from
  5. Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1276–1293. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1276 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gumperz, J. J. (1958). Dialect differences and social stratification in a North Indian Village 1. American Anthropologist, 60(4), 668–682. doi: 10.1525/aa.1958.60.4.02a00050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaeger, T. F. (2009). Random effect: Should I stay or should I go? Retrieved February 8, 2013, from
  8. Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12577–12580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705345104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. M., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C. (2005). Testing the effects of regional, ethnic, and international dialects of english on listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(1), 37–69. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00289.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1973). Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature, 244(5417), 522–523. doi: 10.1038/244522a0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1975). Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 189(4198), 226–228. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4198.226 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1985). Speech shadowing and speech comprehension. Speech Communication, 4(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1016/0167-6393(85)90036-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29–63. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The Weckud Wetch of the Wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 32(3), 543–562. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035357 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sabatini, E. (2000). Listening comprehension, shadowing and simultaneous interpretation of two “non-standard” English speeches. Interpreting, 5(1), 25–48. doi: 10.1075/intp.5.1.03sab CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sumner, M. (2011). The role of variation in the perception of accented speech. Cognition, 119(1), 131–136. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 487–501. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Engen, K. J., & Peelle, J. E. (2014). Listening effort and accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00577
  19. Weatherholtz, K., Campbell-Kibler, K., & Jaeger, T. F. (2014). Socially-mediated syntactic alignment. Language Variation and Change, 26(3), 387–420. doi: 10.1017/S0954394514000155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. White, K. S., & Aslin, R. N. (2011). Adaptation to novel accents by toddlers. Developmental Science, 14(2), 372–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00986.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynn K. Perry
    • 1
  • Emily N. Mech
    • 2
  • Maryellen C. MacDonald
    • 3
  • Mark S. Seidenberg
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  2. 2.University of California, RiversideRiversideUSA
  3. 3.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations