Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 1135–1141 | Cite as

Aging affects the balance between goal-guided and habitual spatial attention

  • Emily L. Twedell
  • Wilma Koutstaal
  • Yuhong V. Jiang
Brief Report


Visual clutter imposes significant challenges to older adults in everyday tasks and often calls on selective processing of relevant information. Previous research has shown that both visual search habits and task goals influence older adults’ allocation of spatial attention, but has not examined the relative impact of these two sources of attention when they compete. To examine how aging affects the balance between goal-driven and habitual attention, and to inform our understanding of different attentional subsystems, we tested young and older adults in an adapted visual search task involving a display laid flat on a desk. To induce habitual attention, unbeknownst to participants, the target was more often placed in one quadrant than in the others. All participants rapidly acquired habitual attention toward the high-probability quadrant. We then informed participants where the high-probability quadrant was and instructed them to search that screen location first—but pitted their habit-based, viewer-centered search against this instruction by requiring participants to change their physical position relative to the desk. Both groups prioritized search in the instructed location, but this effect was stronger in young adults than in older adults. In contrast, age did not influence viewer-centered search habits: the two groups showed similar attentional preference for the visual field where the target was most often found before. Aging disrupted goal-guided but not habitual attention. Product, work, and home design for people of all ages––but especially for older individuals––should take into account the strong viewer-centered nature of habitual attention.


Aging Visual attention Implicit learning Spatial reference frame 


  1. Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 777–799. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.125.6.777 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Grahame, M., Laberge, J., & Scialfa, C. T. (2004). Age differences in search of web pages: The effects of link size, link number, and clutter. Human Factors, 46, 385–398. doi:10.1518/hfes.46.3.385.3808 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Howard, J. H., & Howard, D. V. (2013). Aging mind and brain: Is implicit learning spared in healthy aging? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 817. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00817 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Howard, J. H., Howard, D. V., Dennis, N. A., Yankovich, H., & Vaidya, C. J. (2004). Implicit spatial contextual learning in healthy aging. Neuropsychology, 18(1), 124–134. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.124 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Jiang, Y. V., Koutstaal, W., & Twedell, E. L. (2016). Habitual attention in older and young adults. Psychology & Aging, 31, 970–980. doi:10.1037/pag0000139
  6. Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., & Capistrano, C. G. (2013). Visual search and location probability learning from variable perspectives. Journal of Vision, 13(6), 13. doi:10.1167/13.6.13 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., & Rosenbaum, G. M. (2013). Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 285–297. doi:10.1037/a0028022 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., & Sun, L. (2014). Egocentric coding of space for incidentally learned attention: Effects of scene context and task instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 40(1), 233–250. doi:10.1037/a0033870 Google Scholar
  9. Lemay, M., Bertram, C. P., & Stelmach, G. E. (2004). Pointing to an allocentric and egocentric remembered target in younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 30(4), 391–406. doi:10.1080/03610730490484443 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lithfous, S., Dufour, A., Blanc, F., & Després, O. (2014). Allocentric but not egocentric orientation is impaired during normal aging: An ERP study. Neuropsychology, 28(5), 761–771. doi:10.1037/neu0000084 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McCarley, J. S., Yamani, J. S., Kramer, A. F., & Mounts, J. R. W. (2012). Age, clutter, and competitive selection. Psychology and Aging, 27, 616–626. doi:10.1037/a0026705 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McLaughlin, P. M., & Murtha, S. J. E. (2010). The effects of age and exogenous support on visual search performance. Experimental Aging Research, 36(3), 325–345. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2010.484752 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Montefinese, M., Sulpizio, V., Galati, G., & Committeri, G. (2015). Age-related effects on spatial memory across viewpoint changes relative to different reference frames. Psychological Research, 79(4), 687–697. doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0598-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Olk, B., & Kingstone, A. (2015). Attention and ageing: Measuring effects of involuntary and voluntary orienting in isolation and in combination. British Journal of Psychology, 106(2), 235–252. doi:10.1111/bjop.12082 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Salthouse, T. (2012). Consequences of age-related cognitive declines. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 201–226. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100328 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Squire, L. R., & Wixted, J. T. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 259–288. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113720 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Won, B.-Y., & Jiang, Y. V. (2014). Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(3), 787–806. doi:10.1037/xlm0000040 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily L. Twedell
    • 1
  • Wilma Koutstaal
    • 1
  • Yuhong V. Jiang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations