Pre-crastination in the pigeon

Abstract

Procrastination is the tendency to delay initiating or completing tasks. Rosenbaum et al. (Psychological Science, May 8, 2014) recently documented the opposite of procrastination: pre-crastination, the tendency to begin or to finish tasks as soon as possible. We devised a simple two-alternative forced-choice task, in which pigeons could choose to switch response location either sooner or later in a sequence of actions eventuating in food reward. Even though there was no economic advantage for doing so, pigeons chose to switch response location sooner rather than later in the sequence, showing pre-crastination to be quite general. Pre-crastination thus joins other anticipatory learning phenomena in challenging rational or optimal accounts of behavioral adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bhatt, R. S., & Wasserman, E. A. (1987). Choice behavior of pigeons on progressive and multiple schedules: A test of optimal foraging theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, R. G., Brown, M. F., & Riley, D. A. (1985). Flexible memory processing by rats: Use of prospective and retrospective information in the radial maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 453–469.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, R. G., & Rosen, H. A. (2010). Temporal control of internal states in pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 915–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds: Towards an understanding of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson, B. M., Wasserman, E. A., Frei, L., & Miller, K. (2004). Recent advances in operant conditioning technology: A versatile and affordable computerized touch screen system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36, 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hearst, E., & Jenkins, H. M. (1974). Sign-tracking: The stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hendry, D. P. (1969). Conditioned reinforcement. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Honig, W. K., & Wasserman, E. A. (1981). Performance of pigeons on delayed simple and conditional discriminations under equivalent training procedures. Learning and Motivation, 12, 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Houston, A. I., & McNamara, J. M. (1999). Models of adaptive behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hurley, S., & Nudds, M. (2006). Rational animals? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Locurto, C. W., Terrace, H. S., & Gibbon, J. (1981). Autoshaping and conditioning theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mazur, J. E. (1996). Procrastination by pigeons: Preference for larger, more delayed work requirements. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 159–171.

  14. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pithers, R. T. (1985). The roles of event contingencies and reinforcement in human autoshaping and omission responding. Learning and Motivation, 16, 210–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenbaum, D. A., Gong, L., & Potts, C. A. (2014). Pre-crastination: Hastening subgoal completion at the expense of extra physical effort. Psychological Science, 8, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In C. B. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and organization (pp. 161–176). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wasserman, E. A. (1981). Response evocation in autoshaping. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 21–54). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wasserman, E. A., Carr, D. L., & Deich, J. D. (1978). Association of conditioned stimuli during serial conditioning by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 6, 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wike, E. L. (1962). Secondary reinforcement: Selected experiments. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Williams, D. R., & Williams, H. (1969). Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: Sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 511–520.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zentall, T. R. (2010). Coding of stimuli by animals: Retrospection, prospection, episodic memory and future planning. Learning and Motivation, 41, 225–240.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Leyre Castro and Mike O’Hara for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward A. Wasserman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wasserman, E.A., Brzykcy, S.J. Pre-crastination in the pigeon. Psychon Bull Rev 22, 1130–1134 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0758-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Animal and human associative learning
  • Choice behavior
  • Animal behavior