Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 112–120 | Cite as

The genetics of music accomplishment: Evidence for gene–environment correlation and interaction

  • David Z. HambrickEmail author
  • Elliot M. Tucker-Drob
Brief Report

Abstract

Theories of skilled performance that emphasize training history, such as K. Anders Ericsson and colleagues’ deliberate-practice theory, have received a great deal of recent attention in both the scientific literature and the popular press. Twin studies, however, have demonstrated evidence for moderate-to-strong genetic influences on skilled performance. Focusing on musical accomplishment in a sample of over 800 pairs of twins, we found evidence for gene–environment correlation, in the form of a genetic effect on music practice. However, only about one quarter of the genetic effect on music accomplishment was explained by this genetic effect on music practice, suggesting that genetically influenced factors other than practice contribute to individual differences in music accomplishment. We also found evidence for gene–environment interaction, such that genetic effects on music accomplishment were most pronounced among those engaging in music practice, suggesting that genetic potentials for skilled performance are most fully expressed and fostered by practice.

Keywords

Music Talent Genetics Skill Individual differences 

Notes

Author note

E.M.T.-D. and D.Z.H. jointly developed the study concept and drafted the paper. The data analysis was performed by E.M.T.-D. E.M.T.-D. was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Grant No. R21-HD069772. The Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin is supported by NICHD Grant No. R24-HD042849.

References

  1. Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2013). Explaining the increasing heritability of cognitive ability across development: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychological Science, 24, 1704–1713.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature–nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.568 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coon, H., & Carey, G. (1989). Genetic and environmental determinants of musical ability in twins. Behavior Genetics, 19, 183–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Garay, A. L., Levine, L., & Carter, J. E. L. (1974). Genetic and anthropological studies of Olympic athletes. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ericsson, K. A. (2007). Deliberate practice and the modifiability of body and mind: Toward a science of the structure and acquisition of expert and elite performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38, 4–34.Google Scholar
  7. Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81–103. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.001
  8. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. New York, NY: Macmillan & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2007). The role of domain-specific practice, handedness, and starting age in chess. Developmental Psychology, 43, 159–172. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.159 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Altmann, E. M., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014). Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert? Intelligence, 45, 34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loehlin, J. C., & Nichols, R. C. (1976). Heredity, environment, and personality: A study of 850 sets of twins.Google Scholar
  13. Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science. Google Scholar
  14. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  15. Nichols, R. C., & Bilbro, W. C. (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica et Statistica Medica, 16, 265–275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Loehlin, J. C. (1977). Genotype–environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309–322. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.2.309 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prescott, C. A. (2004). Using the Mplus computer program to estimate models for continuous and categorical data from twins. Behavior Genetics, 34, 17–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rutter, M. (2007). Gene–environment interdependence. Developmental Science, 10, 12–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schneider, W., Bös, K., & Rieder, H. (1993). Leistungsprognose bei jugendlichen Spitzensportlern [Performance prediction in young top athletes]. Aufmerksamkeit und energetisierung. Facetten von Konzentration und Leistung, 277–299.Google Scholar
  20. Tucker-Drob, E. M., Briley, D. A., & Harden, K. P. (2013). Genetic and environmental influences on cognition across development and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 349–355.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vinkhuyzen, A. A., Van der Sluis, S., Posthuma, D., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). The heritability of aptitude and exceptional talent across different domains in adolescents and young adults. Behavior Genetics, 39, 380–392.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism (Revised ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Population Research CenterUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations