Abstract
This study explored how overt attention is influenced by the colour that is primed when a target word is read during a lexical visual search task. Prior studies have shown that attention can be influenced by conceptual or perceptual overlap between a target word and distractor pictures: attention is attracted to pictures that have the same form (rope – snake) or colour (green – frog) as the spoken target word or is drawn to an object from the same category as the spoken target word (trumpet – piano). The hypothesis for this study was that attention should be attracted to words displayed in the colour that is primed by reading a target word (for example, yellow for canary). An experiment was conducted in which participants’ eye movements were recorded whilst they completed a lexical visual search task. The primary finding was that participants’ eye movements were mainly directed towards words displayed in the colour primed by reading the target word, even though this colour was not relevant to completing the visual search task. This result is discussed in terms of top-down guidance of overt attention in visual search for words.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backs, R.W., Walrath, L.C., & Hancock, G.A. (1987). Comparison of horizontal and vertical menu formats. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (pp. 715–717), Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Bekkering, H., & Neggers, S. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13, 370–374. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00466.x
Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225–271. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90017-X
Chun, M.M. & Jiang; Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0681.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 453–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193787
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
Dit Dinard, F. M., Thullier, F., & Vivier, J. (2009). Stratégies d’exploration visuelle: Effet de l’intention d’action sur l’observation d’images d’objets usuels. L’Année Psychologique, 109, 383–405. doi:10.4074/S0003503309003029
Hannus, A., Cornelissen, F. W., Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2005). Selection-for action in visual search. Acta Psychologica, 118, 171–191. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.010
Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96, B23–B32. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003
Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2007). Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition, 15, 985–1018. doi:10.1080/13506280601130875
Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Looking at anything that is green when hearing “frog”: How object surface colour and stored object colour knowledge influence language-mediated overt attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 122–145. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.481474
Hutchinson, J. B., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2012). Memory-guided attention: Control from multiple memory systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 576–579. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.003
Léger, L., Tijus, C., & Baccino, T. (2006). Disposition spatiale et détection de mots. Le Travail Humain, 69(4), 349–377. doi:10.3917/th.694.0349
Léger, L., Rouet, J.-F., Ros, C., & Vibert, N. (2012). Orthographic versus semantic matching in visual search for words within lists. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 32–43. doi:10.1037/a0026111
Moores, E., Laiti, L., & Chelazzi, L. (2003). Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 182–189. doi:10.1038/nn996
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 661–677. doi:10.1017/S014271640707035X
Naor-Raz, G., Tarr, M. J., & Kersten, D. (2003). Is color an intrinsic property of object representation? Perception, 32, 667–680. doi:10.1068/p5050
Olivers, C. N. L. (2011). Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance. Acta Psychologica, 137, 243–247. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.001
Poisson, M. E., & Wilkinson, F. (1992). Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search. Perception, 21, 21–38. doi:10.1068/p210021
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459–478. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.459
Underwood, G., & Foulsham, T. (2006). Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1931–1949. doi:10.1080/17470210500416342
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
Wyble, B., Folk, C., & Potter, M. C. (2013). Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 861–871. doi:10.1037/a0030517.
Yee, E., Ahmed, S., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). Colorless green ideas (can) prime furiously. Psychological Science, 23, 364–369. doi:10.1177/0956797611430691
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Léger, L., Chauvet, E. When canary primes yellow: effects of semantic memory on overt attention. Psychon Bull Rev 22, 200–205 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0657-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0657-7