Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 728–733 | Cite as

On the asymmetric effects of mind-wandering on levels of processing at encoding and retrieval

  • David R. Thomson
  • Daniel Smilek
  • Derek Besner
Brief Report

Abstract

The behavioral consequences of off-task thought (mind-wandering) on primary-task performance are now well documented across an increasing range of tasks. In the present study, we investigated the consequences of mind-wandering on the encoding of information into memory in the context of a levels-of-processing framework (Craik & Lockhart, 1972). Mind-wandering was assessed via subjective self-reports in response to thought probes that were presented under both semantic (size judgment) and perceptual (case judgment) encoding instructions. Mind-wandering rates during semantic encoding negatively predicted subsequent recognition memory performance, whereas no such relation was observed during perceptual encoding. We discuss the asymmetric effects of mind-wandering on levels of processing in the context of attentional-resource accounts of mind-wandering.

Keywords

Recognition memory Attention and memory 

References

  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart’s framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 85, 139–152. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Craik, F. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present . . . and future? Memory, 10, 305–318. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000135 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. He, J., Becic, E., Lee, Y. C., & McCarley, J. S. (2011). Mind-wandering behind the wheel: Performance and oculomotor correlates. Human Factors, 53, 13–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Tulving, E., Wilson, A. A., Houle, S., & Brown, G. M. (1994). Neuroanatomical correlates of encoding in episodic memory: Levels of processing effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 2008–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lockhart, R. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maillet, D., & Rajah, M. N. (2013). Age-related changes in frequency of mind-wandering and task-related interferences during memory encoding and their impact on retrieval. Memory. Advance online publication.. doi: 10.1080/0958211.2012.761714 Google Scholar
  10. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 196–204. doi: 10.1037/a0014104 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Riby, L. M., Smallwood, J., & Gunn, V. P. (2008). Mind-wandering and retrieval from episodic memory: A pilot event-related potential study. Psychological Reports, 102, 805–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Risko, E. F., Anderson, N. A., Sarwal, A., Engelhardt, M., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Everyday attention: Variation in mind-wandering and memory in a lecture. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 234–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 319–326. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Seli, P., Carriere, J. S. A., Levene, M., & Smilek, D. (2013a). How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00430 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013b). Wandering minds and wavering rhythms: Linking mind wandering and behavioral variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1–5. doi: 10.1037/a0030954 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Smallwood, J. (2010). Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 202–207. doi: 10.1037/a0018673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). The lights are on but no one’s home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 527–533. doi: 10.3758/BF03194102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1144–1150. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smallwood, J., Riby, L., Heim, D., & Davies, J. B. (2006). Encoding during the attentional lapse: Accuracy of encoding during the semantic sustained attention to response task. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 218–231. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.03.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomson, D. R., Besner, D., & Smilek, D. (2013). In pursuit of off-task thought: Mind wandering-performance trade-offs while reading aloud and color naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00360 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. Thomson
    • 1
  • Daniel Smilek
    • 1
  • Derek Besner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations