Serial position effects involve the differential recall of information based on its temporal order at encoding. Previous research indicates that learners may be aware of these effects under certain encoding conditions, but it is unclear whether metacognitive control is sensitive to serial position effects. The current study examined whether there are serial position effects in participants’ study time and whether they can learn about serial position effects under fixed encoding conditions and then transfer what they have learned to self-paced study conditions. Specifically, participants were given lists of to-be-remembered words and studied each word for a fixed duration on initial lists, but self-paced their study time on later lists. Results revealed that self-paced study times oppositely mirrored serial position effects (i.e., briefer study times in the beginning and end of each list), and serial position effects were reduced in self-paced study conditions, particularly in participants initially studying under fixed conditions before self-pacing their study time. Specifically, participants may have monitored their output and, based on observations of forgetting middle items, transferred their learning of serial position effects from prior lists. Thus, participants may use forgetting and serial position information to guide encoding, indicating that fundamental properties of the memory system can be incorporated into the processes that guide metacognitive control.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
We did not include the fixed study time group in this analysis, because study time was constant (2 seconds).
Since each model is based on different data (i.e., Lists 1–3 versus Lists 4–6), we are unable to compute a formal comparison between models. Rather, we examine the serial position curves in terms of their relative effect sizes (i.e., R2). Specifically, we frame our discussion in terms of how much of the variance the relative quadratic models accounted for, with models accounting for more variance (revealing a greater quadratic trend) indicating more pronounced serial position effects and models accounting for less variance (revealing a weaker quadratic trend) indicating flatter serial position curves.
Similar to Experiment 1, we did not include the fixed study time group in this analysis, because study time was constant (2 seconds).
Ariel, R. (2013). Learning what to learn: The effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033091
Ariel, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study? Memory & Cognition, 41(3), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0267-4
Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015928
Ariel, R., Al-Harthy, I. S., Was, C. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0128-3
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
Belmont, J. M., & Butterfield, E. C. (1971). Learning strategies as determinants of memory deficiencies. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(71)90024-7
Bröder, A., & Undorf, M. (2019). Metamemory viewed through the judgment lens. Acta Psychologica, 197, 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.011
Brodie, D. A., & Murdock, B. B. (1977). Effect of presentation time on nominal and functional serial-position curves of free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80046-7
Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114(3), 539–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.539
Castel, A. D. (2008). Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: The utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 36(2), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.429
Crowder, R. G. (1969). Behavioral strategies in immediate memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8(4), 524–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80098-8
Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H. J., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.3
Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011a). Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 103–140). Academic Press.
Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011b). The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023064
Dunlosky, J., & Matvey, G. (2001). Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): Effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(5), 1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7322.214.171.1240
Dunlosky, J., Mueller, M. L., & Thiede, K. W. (2016). Methodology for investigating human metamemory: Problems and pitfalls. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology: The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 23–37). Oxford University Press.
Egner, T. (2017). The Wiley handbook of cognitive control. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118920497
Farrell, S. (2012). Temporal clustering and sequencing in short-term memory and episodic memory. Psychological Review, 119(2), 223–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027371
Fischler, I., Rundus, D., & Atkinson, R. C. (1970). Effects of overt rehearsal procedures on free recall. Psychonomic Science, 19(4), 249–250. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328801
Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80044-0
Grenfell-Essam, R., & Ward, G. (2012). Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: The role of list length, strategy use, and test expectancy. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.04.004
Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-73126.96.36.1993
Kellas, G., & Butterfield, E. C. (1971). Effect of response requirement and type of material on acquisition and retention performance in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030663
Kellas, G., Ashcraft, M. H., Johnson, N. S., & Needham, S. (1973). Temporal aspects of storage and retrieval in free recall of categorized lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(5), 499-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80030-1
Kelly, M. O., & Risko, E. F. (2019). Offloading memory: Serial position effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1347–1353. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01615-8
Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34188.8.131.529
Koriat, A. (2015). Knowing by doing: When metacognitive monitoring follows metacognitive control. In D. S. Lindsay (Ed.), C. M. Kelley (Trans.), A. P. Yonelinas, & H. L. Roediger, III (Eds.), Remembering: Attributions, processes, and control in human memory: Essays in honor of Larry Jacoby (pp. 185–197). Psychology Press.
Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one’s own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34184.108.40.2063
Koriat, A., Ma’ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 36–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34220.127.116.11
Krinsky, R. (1993). Serial position and the “labor-in-vain” effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 304–306. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334936
Laming, D. (2010). Serial position curves in free recall. Psychological Review, 117(1), 93–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017839
Lehman, M., & Malmberg, K. J. (2013). A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychological Review, 120(1), 155–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030851
Lohnas, L. J., Polyn, S. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2015). Expanding the scope of memory search: Modeling intralist and interlist effects in free recall. Psychological Review, 122(2), 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039036
McFarland, C. E., & Kellas, G. (1974). Mode of input effects on subject-controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(2), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036819
McGeoch, J. A. (1942). The psychology of human learning: An introduction. Longmans, .
Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.174
Mueller, M. L., & Dunlosky, J. (2017). How beliefs can impact judgments of learning: Evaluating analytic processing theory with beliefs about fluency. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.008
Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 64(5), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045106
Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.102
Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the “labor-in-vain effect”. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(4), 676–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7318.104.22.1686
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 125–173). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116(1), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014420
Rhodes, M. G. (2016). Judgments of learning. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 65–80). Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013684
Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2009). Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: Effects on monitoring and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 550–554. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.550
Roberts, W. A. (1972). Free recall of word lists varying in length and rate of presentation: A test of total-time hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92(3), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032278
Roediger, H. L., & Crowder, R. G. (1976). A serial position effect in recall of United States presidents. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8(4), 275–278. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335138
Rohrer, D., & Wixted, J. T. (1994). An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 22(5), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198390
Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031185
Rundus, D., & Atkinson, R. C. (1970). Rehearsal processes in free recall: A procedure for direct observation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80015-9
Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115(4), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013396
Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 204-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7322.214.171.124
Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1589–1625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-73126.96.36.1999
Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-paced study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-73188.8.131.524
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's work book of 30000 words. Bureau of Publications.
Tiede, H. L., & Leboe, J. P. (2009). Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: Improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 822–828. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015122
Unsworth, N. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: Examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(6), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-73184.108.40.2060
Unsworth, N. (2016). Working memory capacity and recall from long-term memory: Examining the influences of encoding strategies, study time allocation, search efficiency, and monitoring abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000148
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104
Ward, G., Woodward, G., Stevens, A., & Stinson, C. (2003). Using overt rehearsals to explain word frequency effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-73220.127.116.11
Waugh, N. C. (1967). Presentation time and free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024125
Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021797
Zimmerman, J. (1975). Free recall after self-paced study: A test of the attention explanation of the spacing effect. The American Journal of Psychology, 88(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1421597
We would like to thank Karina Agadzhanyan for her assistance in managing data collection.
Conflicts of interest
The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or nonfinancial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Open practices statement
None of the experiments reported in this article was formally preregistered, but the stimuli and data have been made available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/9b35v/?view_only=97db5b2fa22540f28756e22c67912464).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, D.H., Friedman, M.C. & Castel, A.D. Metacognitive control, serial position effects, and effective transfer to self-paced study. Mem Cogn (2021). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01204-y
- Serial position effects
- Transfer of learning