Dynamic adjustments in working memory in the face of affective interference
Cognitive control, which allows for the selection and monitoring of goal-relevant behavior, is dynamically upregulated on the basis of moment-to-moment cognitive demands. One route by which these demands are registered by cognitive control systems is via the detection of response conflict. Yet working memory (WM) demands may similarly signal dynamic adjustments in cognitive control. In a delayed-recognition WM task, Jha and Kiyonaga (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36(4), 1036–1042, 2010) demonstrated dynamic adjustments in cognitive control via manipulations of mnemonic load and delay-spanning cognitive interference. In the present study, we aimed to extend prior work by investigating whether affective interference may similarly upregulate cognitive control. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 89) completed a delayed-recognition WM task in which mnemonic load (memory load of one vs. two items) and delay-spanning affective interference (neutral vs. negative distractors) were manipulated in a factorial design. Consistent with Jha and Kiyonaga, the present results revealed that mnemonic load led to dynamic adjustments in cognitive control, as reflected by greater performance on trials preceded by high than by low load. In addition, we observed that affective interference could trigger dynamic adjustments in cognitive control, as evinced by higher performance on trials preceded by negative than by neutral distractors. These findings were subsequently confirmed in Experiment 2, which was a pre-registered replication study (N = 100). Thus, these results suggest that in addition to dynamic adjustments as a function of mnemonic load, affective interference, similar to cognitive interference (Jha & Kiyonaga Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36(4), 1036–1042, 2010), may trigger dynamic adjustments in cognitive control during a WM task.
KeywordsWorking memory Cognitive control Emotion
The authors thank Ethan Homedi, Shivani Hanchate, Joseph Dunn, and Azin Pooresmaeil for their help with data collection. This work was supported by US Department of Defense, Department of the Army Grant #W81XWH-11-2-0124, awarded to A.P.J., and by a research grant awarded to J.E.W. by the Department of Psychology at the University of Miami and by Fred C. and Helen Donn Flipse.
- Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dolcos, F., Diaz-Granados, P., Wang, L., & McCarthy, G. (2008). Opposing influences of emotional and non-emotional distractors upon sustained prefrontal cortex activity during a delayed-response working memory task. Neuropsychologia, 46, 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fischer, R., Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2008). Context-sensitive adjustments of cognitive control: Conflict-adaptation effects are modulated by processing demands of the ongoing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 712–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-73126.96.36.1992 Google Scholar
- Iordan, A. D., & Dolcos, F. (2017). Brain activity and network interactions linked to valence-related differences in the impact of emotional distraction. Cerebral Cortex, 27, 731–749.Google Scholar
- Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-8). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.Google Scholar
- Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2014). The neural bases of emotion and emotion regulation: A valuation perspective. In J. J. Gross & R. Thompson (Eds.), The handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 23–42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Shah, S. G., Klumpp, H., Angstadt, M., Nathan, P. J., & Phan, K. L. (2009). Amygdala and insula response to emotional images in patients with generalized social anxiety disorder. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 34, 296.Google Scholar
- Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-15188.8.131.525 Google Scholar