The mere exposure effect for visual image
Mere exposure effect refers to a phenomenon in which repeated stimuli are evaluated more positively than novel stimuli. We investigated whether this effect occurs for internally generated visual representations (i.e., visual images). In an exposure phase, a 5 × 5 dot array was presented, and a pair of dots corresponding to the neighboring vertices of an invisible polygon was sequentially flashed (in red), creating an invisible polygon. In Experiments 1, 2, and 4, participants visualized and memorized the shapes of invisible polygons based on different sequences of flashed dots, whereas in Experiment 3, participants only memorized positions of these dots. In a subsequent rating phase, participants visualized the shape of the invisible polygon from allocations of numerical characters on its vertices, and then rated their preference for invisible polygons (Experiments 1, 2, and 3). In contrast, in Experiment 4, participants rated the preference for visible polygons. Results showed that the mere exposure effect appeared only when participants visualized the shape of invisible polygons in both the exposure and rating phases (Experiments 1 and 2), suggesting that the mere exposure effect occurred for internalized visual images. This implies that the sensory inputs from repeated stimuli play a minor role in the mere exposure effect. Absence of the mere exposure effect in Experiment 4 suggests that the consistency of processing between exposure and rating phases plays an important role in the mere exposure effect.
KeywordsMere exposure effect Visual image Perceptual fluency
This work was supported by a Grant-in-aid (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. 20530657, 15K00211, and 26870751) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
We would like to thank to Prof. Tadashi Kikuchi. He is an important collaborator on this study. However, we are saddened to report that he passed away prior to the completion of this article.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., & Kauff, D. M. (1983). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: Effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(3), 544–555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7318.104.22.1684 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seamon, J. G., Ganor-Stern, D., Crowley, M. J., Wilson, S. M., Weber, W. J., O’Rourke, C. M., & Mahoney, J. K. (1997). A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25(3), 367–374. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S. A., Orne, P. J., & Wishengrad, D. L. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 711–721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7322.214.171.1241 Google Scholar
- Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 39–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., … Morey, R. D. (2017). Bayesian inference for psychology: Part 2. Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
- Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35126.96.36.1999 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar