Memory for conversation and the development of common ground

  • Geoffrey L. McKinley
  • Sarah Brown-Schmidt
  • Aaron S. Benjamin
Article

Abstract

Efficient conversation is guided by the mutual knowledge, or common ground, that interlocutors form as a conversation progresses. Characterized from the perspective of commonly used measures of memory, efficient conversation should be closely associated with item memory—what was said—and context memory—who said what to whom. However, few studies have explicitly probed memory to evaluate what type of information is maintained following a communicative exchange. The current study examined how item and context memory relate to the development of common ground over the course of a conversation, and how these forms of memory vary as a function of one’s role in a conversation as speaker or listener. The process of developing common ground was positively related to both item and context memory. In addition, content that was spoken was remembered better than content that was heard. Our findings illustrate how memory assessments can complement language measures by revealing the impact that basic conversational processes have on memory for what has been discussed. By taking this approach, we show that not only does the process of forming common ground facilitate communication in the present, but it also promotes an enduring record of that event, facilitating conversation into the future.

Keywords

Common ground Destination memory Source memory Egocentrism Referential communication Conversation 

References

  1. Banks, W. P. (1970). Signal detection theory and human memory. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, A. S. (2006). The effects of list-method directed forgetting on recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 874–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamin, A. S., Diaz, M., Matzen, L. E., & Johnson, B. (2012). Tests of the DRYAD theory of the age-related deficit in memory for context: Not about context, and not about aging. Psychology and Aging, 27(2), 418–428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1482–1493.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, A. S., Jones, E. M., & Davis, T. L. (1995). Age differences in conversational source monitoring. Psychology & Aging, 10, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 171–190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown-Schmidt, S. (2012). Beyond common and privileged: Gradient representations of common ground in real-time language use. Language Cognitive Processes, 27, 62–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown-Schmidt, S., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2015). Interpretation of informational questions modulated by joint knowledge and intonational contours. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. D. Behrend (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshe, B. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Egan, J. P. (1958). Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (Tech. Note AFCRC‑TN‑58–51). Bloomington: Indiana University, Hearing and Communication Laboratory.Google Scholar
  19. Fischer, N. M., Schult, J. C., & Steffens, M. C. (2015). Source and destination memory in face-to-face interaction: A multinomial modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(2), 195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraundorf, S. H., Watson, D. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2015). Reduction in prosodic prominence predicts speakers’ recall: Implication for theories of prosody. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(5), 606–619.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodwin, A. P., Gilbert, J. K., & Cho, S. J. (2013). Morphological contributions to adolescent word reading: An item response approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gopie, N., & MacLeod, C. M. (2009). Destination memory: Stop me if I've told you this before. Psychological Science, 20, 1492–1499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorman, K. S., Gegg-Harrison, W., Marsh, C. R., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2013). What’s learned together stays together: Speakers’ choice of referring expression reflects shared experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 843–853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horton, W. S. (2007). The influence of partner-specific memory associations on language production: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 1114–1139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2002). Speakers' experiences and audience design: Knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005a). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition, 96, 127–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005b). Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Processes, 40, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hupet, M., Chantraine, Y., & Nef, F. (1993). References in conversation between young and old normal adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 339–346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Isaacs, E., (1990). Mutual memory for conversation (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Standord, CA).Google Scholar
  32. Issacs, E. A., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jurica, P. J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1999). Monitoring item and source information: Evidence for a negative generation effect in source memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 648–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keenan, J. M., MacWhinney, B., & Mayhew, D. (1977). Pragmatics in memory: A study in natural conversation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knutsen, D., & Le Bigot, L. (2012). Managing dialogue: How information availability affects collaborative reference production. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 326–341.Google Scholar
  39. Knutsen, D., & Le Bigot, L. (2014). Capturing egocentric biases in reference reuse during collaborative dialogue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1590–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Druch, A. (1991). The contextualization of memory for input and output events. Psychological Research, 53, 260–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Krauss, R. M., Garlock, C. M., Bricker, P. D., & McMahon, L. E. (1977). The role of audible and visible back channel responses in interpersonal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krauss, R. M., & Weinheimer, S. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 343–346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuhlen, A. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2013). Language in dialogue: When confederates might be hazardous to your data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacLeod, C. M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K. L., Neary, K. R., & Ozubko, J. D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 671–685.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. MacWhinney, B., Keenan, J. M., & Reinke, P. (1982). The role of arousal in memory for conversation. Memory & Cognition, 10, 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marsh, E. J., Edelman, G., & Bower, G. H. (2001). Demonstrations of a generation effect in context memory. Memory & Cognition, 29, 798–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2002). Comparisons of target output monitoring to source input monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 845–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, J. B., deWinstanley, P., & Carey, P. (1996). Memory for conversation. Memory, 4, 615–631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mulligan, N. W., Lozito, J. P., & Rosner, Z. A. (2006). Generation and context memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 836–846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Pasupathi, M., Stallworth, L. M., & Murdoch, K. (1998). How what we tell becomes what we know: Listener effects on speaker’s long-term memory for events. Discourse Processes, 26, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ratcliff, R., Clark, S. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1990). List strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 163–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045–1060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18(5), 407–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Riefer, D. M., Chien, Y., & Reimer, J. F. (2007). Positive and negative generation effects in source monitoring. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1389–1405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Roediger, H. L., & Schmidt, S. R. (1980). Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired associate lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 91–105.Google Scholar
  60. Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592–604.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stafford, L., Burggraf, C. S., & Sharkey, W. F. (1987). Conversational memory: The effects of time, recall mode, and memory expectancies on remembrances of natural conversations. Human Communication Research, 14, 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stafford, L., & Daly, J. A. (1984). Conversational memory: The effects of recall mode and memory expectancies on remembrances of natural conversations. Human Communication Research, 10, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Starns, J. J., Hicks, J. L., Brown, N. L., & Martin, B. A. (2008). Source memory for unrecognized items: Predictions from multivariate signal detection theory. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilkes-Gibbs, D., & Clark, H. H. (1992). Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yoon, S., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2014). Adjusting conceptual pacts in three-party conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 919–937.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey L. McKinley
    • 1
  • Sarah Brown-Schmidt
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Aaron S. Benjamin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and TechnologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychology and Human DevelopmentVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations