Waiting for feedback helps if you want to know the answer: the role of curiosity in the delay-of-feedback benefit
- 574 Downloads
When participants answer a test question and then receive feedback of the correct answer, studies have shown that the feedback is more effective when it is delayed by several seconds rather than provided immediately (e.g., Brackbill & Kappy, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 14–18, 1962; Schroth, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 78–82, 1992). Despite several demonstrations of this delay-of-feedback benefit, a theoretical explanation for this finding has not yet been developed. The present study tested the hypothesis that brief delays of feedback are beneficial because they encourage anticipation of the upcoming feedback. In Experiment 1, participants answered obscure trivia questions, and before receiving the answer, they rated their curiosity to know the answer. The answer was then provided either immediately or after a 4-s delay. A later final test over the same questions revealed a significant delay-of-feedback benefit, but only for items that had been rated high in curiosity. Experiment 2 replicated this same effect and showed that the delay-of-feedback benefit only occurs when feedback is provided after a variable, unpredictable time duration (either 2, 4, or 8 s) rather than after a constant duration (always 4 s). These findings demonstrate that the delay-of-feedback effect appears to be greatest under conditions in which participants are curious to know the answer and when the answer is provided after an unpredictable time interval.
KeywordsDelay of feedback Curiosity Memory
This study was conducted as part of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by the first author. Portions of this study were presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society (Seattle, WA, November 2011). We thank Ashley Adams, Syamim Hasim, Lauren Miller, Courtney Tapp, and Andrew Woods for their assistance with data collection and scoring.
- Botham, N. (2006). The book of useless information. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20, 963–973. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maw, W. H., & Maw, E. W. (1961). Information recognition by children with high and low curiosity. Educational Research Bulletin, 40, 197–224.Google Scholar
- Mullet, H. G., Butler, A. C., Verdin, B., von Borries, R., & Marsh, E. J. (2014). Delaying feedback promotes transfer of knowledge despite student preferences to receive feedback immediately. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.05.001
- Parlow, J., & Berlyne, D. E. (1971). The effect of prior guessing on incidental learning of verbal associations. Journal of Structural Learning, 2, 55–65.Google Scholar
- Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 706–716. doi: 10.1037/0278-73188.8.131.526 Google Scholar
- Zaromb, F. M., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2010). Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: Effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 552–557. doi: 10.1037/a0018277 PubMedGoogle Scholar