Learning & Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 422–431 | Cite as

Expanding the definitional criteria for imaginative play: Contributions of sociocultural perspectives

Article
  • 470 Downloads

Abstract

This article proposes expanding four existing criteria for imaginative play in view of recent advances in sociocultural perspectives on the study of human development. Imaginative play is commonly defined as intrinsically motivated, open ended, pleasure seeking, and an escape from reality. Grounded in sociocultural research, and, as such, in the relation between individual and social and cultural environment, we argue that these four criteria should shift from assumptions to research questions: What are the motives for imaginative play? What are the goals for imaginative play? What affective dimensions emerge in imaginative play? What, how, and why do features of reality and imagination emerge through play? Expanding definitional criteria in this fashion enables researchers to remain open to variations in an individual’s experience over time, across participants, and cultural variations rather than imposing dominant cultural assumptions as explanatory heuristics. Implications for research and education are discussed.

Keywords

Imaginative play Sociocultural perspectives Culture and context 

References

  1. Bakker, A., & Derry, J. (2011). Lessons from inferentialism for statistics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1/2), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. A. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39–51.Google Scholar
  3. Berk, L. E., Mann, T. D., & Ogan, A. T. (2006). Make-believe play: Wellspring for development of self-regulation. In D. G. Singer, R. M. Golinkoff, & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Play = learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp. 74–100). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berk, L. A., & Meyers, A. B. (2013). The role of make-believe play in the development of executive functions: Status of research and future directions. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 98–110.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, S. (with C. Vaughn). (2009). Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. New York, NY: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, C. D. (2003). In sickness and in play: Children coping with chronic illness. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Corsaro, W. A. (1983). Script recognition, articulation, and expansion in children’s role play. Discourse Processes, 6(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Beauvoir, S. (1994). The prime of life: The autobiography of Simone de Beauvoir 1929–1944. Boston: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, C. P. (2000). Children’s play in cross-cultural perspective: A new look at the Six Cultures Study. Cross-Cultural Research, 34(4), 318–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fein, G. G. (1981). Pretend play in childhood: An integrative review. Child Development, 52(4), 1095–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1961). Beyond the pleasure principle. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Freyberg, J. T. (1973). Increasing the imaginative play of urban disadvantaged kindergarten children through systematic training. In J. I. Singer (Ed.), The child’s world of make-believe. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Garvey, C. (1977). Play. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Garvey. C. & Berndt, R. (1975). Organization in pretend play. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, Il.Google Scholar
  15. Gaskins, S. (1999). Children’s daily lives in a Mayan village: A case study of culturally constructed roles and activities. In A. Göncü (Ed.), Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 25–60). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gaskins, S. (2013). Pretend play as culturally constructed activity. In M. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of imagination (pp. 224–247). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gaskins, S., & Miller, P. J. (2009). The cultural roles of emotions in pretend play. In C. D. Clark (Ed.), Transactions at play (pp. 5–21). Lanham, MD: University Press of America (Play and Cultural Studies Series).Google Scholar
  18. Giffin, H. (1984). The coordination of meaning in the creation of shared make-believe play. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play (pp. 73–100). Orlando: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodnow, J. J. (1988). Children’s household work: Its nature and functions. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodwin, M. H. (1990). “He-said-she-said”: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Göncü, A. (1993). Development of intersubjectivity in social pretend play. Human Development, 36, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Göncü, A. (2017). Constructing the ensemble: Negotiating life with(in) play. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  23. Göncü, A. & Gauvain, M. (2011). Sociocultural approaches to educational psychology: Theory, research, and application. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), The APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 125–154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  24. Göncü, A. & Jain, J. (1999). The construction and meaning of pretense in mother-child interaction. Paper presented at the meeting of Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  25. Göncü, A. & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2015). Returning to play: The critical location of play in children's sociocultural lives. In S. Douglas & L. Stirling (Eds.), Children's play, pretense, and story: Studies in culture, context, and autism spectrum disorder (pp. 294–313). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Göncü, A., Abel, B., & Boshans, M. (2010). The role of attachment and play in young children's learning and development. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. S. Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 35-72). London: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  27. Göncü, A., Jain, J., & Tuermer, U. (2007). Children’s play as cultural interpretation. In A. Göncü & S. Gaskins (Eds.), Play and development: Evolutionary, sociocultural, and functional perspectives (pp. 155–178). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Göncü, A., & Kessel, F. (1984). Children’s play: A contextual-functional perspective. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 25, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Göncü, A., Mistry, J., & Mosier, C. (2000). Cultural variations in the play of toddlers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(3), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Göncü, A., Tuermer, U., Jain, J., & Johnson, D. (1999). Children’s play as cultural activity. In A. Göncü (Ed.), Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 148–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Göncü, A., & Weber, E. (2000). Preschoolers’ classroom activities and interactions with peers and teachers. Early Education and Development, 11, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gordon, D. E. (1993). The inhibition of pretend play and its implications for development. Human Development, 36, 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haight, W. L., & Miller, P. J. (1993). Pretending at home: Early development in a sociocultural context. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  34. Haight, W. L., Wang, X., Fung, H. H., Williams, K., & Mintz, J. (1999). Universal, developmental, and variable aspects of young children’s play: A cross-cultural comparison of pretending at home. Child Development, 70(6), 1477–1488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Howes, C., Unger, O., & Seidner, L. (1989). Social pretend play in toddlers: Parallels with social play and solitary pretend. Child Development, 60, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kağitçibaşi, C. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Lancy, D. (2008). The anthropology of childhood: Cherubs, chattel, changelings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Larson, R. W., & Verma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701–736.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, C. D. (2000). Signifying in the zone of proximal development. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 191–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lillard, A. S. (2015). The development of play. In L. S. Liben & U. Mueller (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Volume 2: Cognitive processes (pp. 425–468). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Lillard, A. S., Lerner, M. D., Hopkins, E. J., Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Palmquist, C. M. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children's development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 1–34. doi: 10.1037/a0029321 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, P. (1982). Amy, Wendy, and Beth: Learning language in south Baltimore. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  44. Nicolopoulou, A., & Ilgaz, H. (2013). What do we know about pretend play and narrative development? A response to Lillard, Lerner, Hopkins, Dore, Smith, & Palmquist on “The impact of pretend play on children’s development: A review of the evidence. American Journal of Play, 6(1), 55–81.Google Scholar
  45. Piaget, J. (1945). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  46. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Göncü, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 1–179.Google Scholar
  48. Roopnarine, J. L., & Davidson, K. L. (2015). Parent–child play across cultures: Advancing play research. American Journal of Play, 7(2), 228–252.Google Scholar
  49. Roopnarine, J. L., & Johnson, J. E. (1994). The need to look at play in diverse cultural settings. In J. L. Roopnarine, J. E. Johnson, & F. H. Hooper (Eds.), Children’s play in diverse cultures (pp. 1–8). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rubin, K. H., Fein, G., & Vandenberg, B. (1983). Play. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4, Socialization, personality, and social development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Saltz, E., & Johnson, J. (1974). Training for thematic-fantasy play in culturally disadvantaged children: Preliminary results. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(4), 623–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sawyer, R. K. (1997). Pretend play as improvisation: Conversation in the preschool classroom. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  54. Schousboe, I. (2013). The structure of fantasy play and its implications for good and evil games. In I. Schousboe & D. Winther-Lindqvist (Eds.), Children’s play and development: Cultural-historical perspectives (pp. 13–27). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schwartzman, H. (1978). Transformations: The anthropology of children’s play. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  56. Seidman, S., Nelson, K., & Gruendel, J. (1986). Make-believe scripts: The transformation of ERS in fantasy. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Event knowledge: Structure and function in development (pp. 161–188). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Sutton-Smith, B. (1979). Play and learning. New York: Garden Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tudge, J. (2008). The everyday lives of young children: Culture, class, and child rearing in diverse societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2017). Vygotsky and the promise of public education. New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vadeboncoeur, J. A., Perone, A., & Panina-Beard, N. (2016). Creativity as a practice of freedom: Imaginative play, moral imagination, and the production of culture. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp. 285-305). Basingstoke: PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  61. Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 6–18 (Original work published 1933).Google Scholar
  62. Vygotsky, V. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Vygotsky, V. S. (1987a). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology, including the volume Thinking and speech (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press (Original work published 1934).Google Scholar
  64. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987–1998). The collected works of L. S Vygotsky. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Cambridge: Blackwell (Original work published 1935).Google Scholar
  66. Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97 (Original work published 1930).Google Scholar
  67. Weisberg, D. S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Embracing complexity: Rethinking the relation between play and learning: Comment on Lillard et al. (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 35–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wells, G. (2008). Learning to use scientific concepts. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wells, K. (2009). Childhood in global perspective. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wertsch, J. V. & Stone, C. A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky's account of the genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 162-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations