Learning & Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 390–405 | Cite as

Social play as joint action: A framework to study the evolution of shared intentionality as an interactional achievement

  • Raphaela Heesen
  • Emilie Genty
  • Federico Rossano
  • Klaus Zuberbühler
  • Adrian Bangerter
Article

Abstract

Social play has a complex, cooperative nature that requires substantial coordination. This has led researchers to use social games to study cognitive abilities like shared intentionality, the skill and motivation to share goals and intentions with others during joint action. We expand this proposal by considering play as a joint action and examining how shared intentionality is achieved during human joint action. We describe how humans get into, conduct, and get out of joint actions together in an orderly way, thereby constructing the state of “togetherness” characteristic of shared intentionality. These processes play out as three main phases, the opening (where participants are ratified and joint commitments are established), the main body (where progress, ongoing commitments, and possible role reversals are coordinated), and the closing (where the intention to terminate the action is coordinated and where participants take leave of each other). We use this process in humans as a framework for examining how various animal species get into, maintain, and get out of play bouts. This comparative approach constitutes an alternative measure of those species’ possession of shared intentionality. Using this framework, we review the play literature on human children and different social species of mammals and birds in search of behavioral markers of shared intentionality in the coordination of play bouts. We discuss how our approach could shed light on the evolution of the special human motivation to cooperate and share psychological states with others.

Keywords

Social play Joint action Shared intentionality Communication Cooperation 

Notes

Author note

Raphaela Heesen, Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland; Emilie Genty, Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland; Federico Rossano, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, CA, USA; Klaus Zuberbühler, Department of Comparative Cognition, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland, and School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, Scotland (UK); Adrian Bangerter, Institute of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

The present research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No. CR31I3_166331 awarded to AB and KZ). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Albert, S., & Kessler, S. (1976). Processes for ending social encounters: The conceptual archaeology of a temporal place. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 6, 147–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1976.tb00363.x Google Scholar
  2. Aldis, O. (1975). Play fighting. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bangerter, A., & Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27, 195–225. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00118-0 Google Scholar
  4. Bangerter, A., Clark, H. H., & Katz, A. R. (2004). Navigating joint projects in telephone conversations. Discourse Processes, 37, 1–23. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp3701_1 Google Scholar
  5. Bangerter, A., Chevalley, E., & Derouwaux, S. (2010). Managing third-party interruptions in conversations: Effects of duration and conversational role. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 235–244. doi: 10.1177/0261927X09359591 Google Scholar
  6. Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 107–122. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00041790 Google Scholar
  7. Bauer, E. B., & Smuts, B. B. (2007). Cooperation and competition during dyadic play in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behaviour, 73, 489–499. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.006 Google Scholar
  8. Bekoff, M. (1974). Social play and play-soliciting by infant canids. American Zoologist, 14, 323. doi: 10.1093/icb/14.1.323 Google Scholar
  9. Bekoff, M. (1977). Social communication in canids: Evidence for the evolution of a stereotyped mammalian display, Animal Studies Repository, 197, 1097–1099. Retrieved from http://animalstudiesrepository.org/acwp_ena/39/
  10. Bekoff, M. (1995). Play signals as punctuation: The structure of social play in canids. Behaviour, 132, 419–429. doi: 10.1163/156853995X00649 Google Scholar
  11. Bekoff, M. (2001). Social play behavior: Cooperation, fairness, trust, and the evolution of morality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 81–90. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/2001/00000008/00000002/1075
  12. Bekoff, M. (2004). Wild justice and fair play: Cooperation, forgiveness, and morality in animals. Biology and Philosophy, 19, 489–520. doi: 10.1007/sBIPH-004-0539-x Google Scholar
  13. Bekoff, M., & Allen, C. (1998). Intentional communication and social play: How and why animals negotiate and agree to play. In M. Bekoff & A. Byers (Eds.), Animal play: Evolutionary, comparative, and ecological perspectives (pp. 97–114). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Berger, I., Viney, R., & Rae, J. P. (2016). Do continuing states of incipient talk exist? Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 29–44. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.009 Google Scholar
  15. Blomqvist, C., Mello, I., & Amundin, M. (2005). An acoustic play-fight signal in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in human care. Aquatic Mammals, 31, 187–194. doi: 10.1578/AM.31.2.2005.187 Google Scholar
  16. Blurton-Jones, N. G. (1972). Categories of child-child interaction. In N. G. Blurton-Jones (Ed.), Ethological studies of child behaviour (pp. 97–127). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Boesch, C. (1991). Teaching among wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 41, 530–532.Google Scholar
  18. Boesch, C. (2002). Cooperative hunting roles among taï chimpanzees. Human Nature, 13, 27–46. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1013-6 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bolden, G. B. (2008). Reopening Russian conversations: The discourse particle –to and the negotiation of interpersonal accountability in closings. Human Communication Research, 34, 99–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00315.x Google Scholar
  20. Bratman, M. E. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101, 327–341. doi: 10.2307/2185537 Google Scholar
  21. Bretherton, I. (Ed.). (1984). Symbolic play: The development of social understanding. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Broth, M., & Mondada, L. (2013). Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 47, 41–58. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.016 Google Scholar
  23. Brownell, C. A., & Brown, E. (1992). Peers and play in infants and toddlers. In V. B. Van Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of social development: A lifespan perspective (pp. 183–200). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  24. Brownell, C. A., & Carriger, M. S. (1990). Changes in cooperation and self-other differentiation during the second year. Child Development, 61, 1164–1174. doi: 10.2307/1130884 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Brownell, C. A., Ramani, G. B., & Zerwas, S. (2006). Becoming a social partner with peers: Cooperation and social understanding in one- and two-year-olds. Child Development, 77, 803–821. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.t01-1-.x-i1 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Call, J. (2009). Contrasting the social cognition of humans and nonhuman apes: The shared intentionality hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 368–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01025.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 192–206. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.2.192 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). The gestural communication of apes and monkeys. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Call, J., Hare, B., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2004). “Unwilling” versus “unable”: Chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentional action. Developmental Science, 7, 488–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00368.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Carpenter, M. (2009). Just how joint is joint action in infancy? Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 380–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01026.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Carpenter, M., Tomasello, M., & Striano, T. (2005). Role reversal imitation and language in typically developing infants and children with autism. Infancy, 8, 253–278. doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0803_4 Google Scholar
  32. Chevalley, E., & Bangerter, A. (2010). Suspending and reinstating joint activities with dialogue. Discourse Processes, 47, 263–291. doi: 10.1080/01638530902959935 Google Scholar
  33. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Clark, H. H. (2006). Social actions, social commitments. In N. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 126–150). Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
  35. Clark, E. V. (2009). First language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Clark, H. H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123, 324–347. doi: 10.1037/rev0000026 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Clark, H. H., & Bangerter, A. (2004). Changing ideas about reference. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 25–49). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9780230524125_2 Google Scholar
  38. Clark, H. H., & French, J. W. (1981). Telephone goodbyes. Language in Society, 10, 1–19. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500008393 Google Scholar
  39. Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 62–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.004 Google Scholar
  40. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7 Google Scholar
  41. Croft, D. B., & Snaith, F. (1990). Boxing in red kangaroos, Macropos Rufus: Aggression or play? International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 4, 221–236.Google Scholar
  42. Davila Ross, M., Owren, M. J., & Zimmermann, E. (2010). The evolution of laughter in great apes and humans. Communicative and Integrative Biology, 3, 191–194. doi: 10.4161/cib.3.2.10944 Google Scholar
  43. De Ruiter, J. P., & Albert, S. (2017). An appeal for a methodological fusion of conversation analysis and experimental psychology. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50, 90–107. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2017.1262050 Google Scholar
  44. Demuru, E., Ferrari, P. F., & Palagi, E. (2015). Emotionality and intentionality in bonobo playful communication. Animal Cognition, 18, 333–344. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0804-6 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Diamond, J., & Bond, A. B. (2003). A comparative analysis of social play in birds. Behaviour, 140, 1091–1115. doi: 10.1163/156853903322589650 Google Scholar
  46. Diamond, J., & Bond, A. B. (2004). Social play in kaka (Nestor meridionalis) with comparisons to kea (Nestor notabilis). Behaviour, 141, 777–798. doi: 10.1163/1568539042265680 Google Scholar
  47. Eckerman, C. O., & Didow, S. M. (1996). Nonverbal imitation and toddlers’ mastery of verbal means of achieving coordinated action. Developmental Psychology, 32, 141–152. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.141 Google Scholar
  48. Eckerman, C. O., & Peterman, K. (2001). Peers and infant social/communicative development. In G. Bremner & A. Fogel (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of infant development (pp. 326–350). New York, NY: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470996348.ch12 Google Scholar
  49. Eckerman, C. O., Davis, C. C., & Didow, S. M. (1989). Toddlers’ emerging ways of achieving social coordinations with a peer. Child Development, 60, 440–453. doi: 10.2307/1130988 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Enomoto, T. (1990). Social play and sexual behavior of the bonobo (Pan paniscus) with special reference to flexibility. Primates, 31, 469–480. doi: 10.1007/BF02382531 Google Scholar
  51. Fedurek, P., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009). What does mutual grooming tell us about why chimpanzees groom? Ethology, 115, 566–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01637.x Google Scholar
  52. Fein, G. G. (1981). Pretend play in childhood: An integrative review. Child Development, 52, 1095–1118. doi: 10.2307/1129497 Google Scholar
  53. Foroud, A., & Pellis, S. M. (2003). The development of “roughness” in the play fighting of rats: A Laban Movement Analysis perspective. Developmental Psychobiology, 42, 35–43. doi: 10.1002/dev.10088 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Fröhlich, M., Kuchenbuch, P., Müller, G., Fruth, B., Furuichi, T., Wittig, R. M., & Pika, S. (2016). Unpeeling the layers of language: Bonobos and chimpanzees engage in cooperative turn-taking sequences. Scientific Reports, 6, 25887. doi: 10.1038/srep25887 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Fröhlich, M., Wittig, R. M., & Pika, S. (2016). Play-solicitation gestures in chimpanzees in the wild: flexible adjustment to social circumstances and individual matrices. Royal Society Open Science, 3. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160278
  56. Fry, D. P. (1987). Differences between playfighting and serious fighting among Zapotec children. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 285–306. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(87)90029-X Google Scholar
  57. Fry, D. P. (1990). Play aggression among Zapotec children: Implications for the practice hypothesis. Aggressive Behavior, 16, 321–340. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1990)16:5<321::AID-AB2480160504>3.0.CO;2-D Google Scholar
  58. Fry, D. P. (2005). Rough-and-tumble social play in humans. In A. D. Pellegrini & P. K. Smith (Eds.), The nature of play: Great apes and humans (pp. 54–85). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  59. Galantucci, B., & Sebanz, N. (2009). Joint action: Current perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 255–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01017.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Garvey, C. (1974). Some properties of social play. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 20, 163–180.Google Scholar
  61. Garvey, C. (1977). Play with language and speech. In S. M. Ervin-Tripp & R. C. Mitchel- Keenan (Eds.), Child discourse (pp. 27–47). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  62. Garvey, C., & Berndt, R. (1975, August). The organization of pretend play. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED114891
  63. Gaskins, S. (2013). Pretend play as culturally constructed activity. In M. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of imagination (pp. 224–247). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Genty, E., Breuer, T., Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2009). Gestural communication of the gorilla (Gorilla gorilla): Repertoire, intentionality and possible origins. Animal Cognition, 12, 527–546. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0213-4 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Genty, E., Clay, Z., Hobaiter, C., & Zuberbühler, K. (2014). Multi-modal use of a socially directed call in bonobos. PLoS ONE, 9, e84738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084738 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Giffin, H. (1984). The coordination of meaning in the creation of a shared make-believe reality. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play: The development of social understanding (pp. 73–100). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  67. Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Forms of talk (pp. 124–159). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  68. Gómez, J.-C., & Martin-Andrade, B. (2005). Fantasy play in apes. In A. D. Pellegrini & P. K. Smith (Eds.), The nature of play: Great apes and humans (pp. 139–172). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  69. González-Martínez, E., Bangerter, A., & Lê Van, K. (2017). Passing-by “Ça va?” checks in clinic corridors. Semiotica, 1–42. doi: 10.1515/sem-2015-0107
  70. Gräfenhain, M., Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Young children’s understanding of joint commitments. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1430–1443. doi: 10.1037/a0016122 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Gräfenhain, M., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Three-year-olds’ understanding of the consequences of joint commitments. PLoS ONE, 8, e73039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073039 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  73. Haight, W., & Miller, P. J. (1992). The development of everyday pretend play: A longitudinal study of mothers’ participation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 331–349.Google Scholar
  74. Haight, W. L., Wang, X., Fung, H. H., Williams, K., & Mintz, J. (1999). Universal, developmental, and variable aspects of young children’s play: A cross-cultural comparison of pretending at home. Child Development, 70, 1477–1488. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00107 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (Eds.). (2004). Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Henry, J. D., & Herrero, S. (1974). Social play in the American black bear: Its similarity to canid social play and an examination of its identifying characteristics. American Zoologist, 14, 371–389. doi: 10.1093/icb/14.1.371 Google Scholar
  77. Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2011). The gestural repertoire of the wild chimpanzee. Animal Cognition, 14, 745–767. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0409-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2014). The meanings of chimpanzee gestures. Current Biology, 24, 1596–1600. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.066 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Hobaiter, C., Leavens, D. A., & Byrne, R. W. (2014). Deictic gesturing in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)? Some possible cases. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128, 82–87. doi: 10.1037/a0033757 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Hobaiter, C., Byrne, R. W., & Zuberbühler, K. (2017). Wild chimpanzees’ use of single and combined vocal and gestural signals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 96. doi: 10.1007/s00265-017-2325-1 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Horowitz, A. (2009). Attention to attention in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) dyadic play. Animal Cognition, 12, 107–118. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0175-y PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Humphreys, A. P., & Smith, P. K. (1984). Rough-and-tumble in preschool and playground. In P. K. Smith (Ed.), Play in animals and humans (pp. 241–266). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  83. Kachel, U., Svetlova, M., & Tomasello, M. (2017). Three-year-olds’ reactions to a partner’s failure to perform her role in a joint commitment. Child Development, 1–13. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12816
  84. Kendon, A. (1976). The F-formation system: The spatial organization of social encounters. Man-Environment Systems, 6, 291–296.Google Scholar
  85. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Levinson, S. C. (2006a). Cognition at the heart of human interaction. Discourse Studies, 8, 85–93. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059557 Google Scholar
  87. Levinson, S. C. (2006b). On the human“ interaction engine.”. In N. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 39–69). Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
  88. Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication—Origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Levinson, S. C., & Holler, J. (2014). The origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0302
  90. Lillard, A. S. (1993). Pretend play skills and the child’s theory of mind. Child Development, 64, 348–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02914.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Lillard, A. (2007). Guided participation: How mothers structure and children understand pretend play. In A. Göncü & S. Gaskins (Eds.), Play and development: Evolutionary, sociocultural, and functional perspectives (pp. 131–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  92. Lillard, A. S., & Witherington, D. C. (2004). Mothers’ behavior modifications during pretense and their possible signal value for toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 40, 95–113. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.95 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., Striano, T., & Tomasello, M. (2006). 12- and 18-month-olds point to provide information for others. Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 173–187. doi: 10.1207/s15327647jcd0702_2 Google Scholar
  94. Luef, E. M., & Liebal, K. (2013). The hand-on gesture in gorillas (Gorilla gorilla). Interaction Studies, 14, 44–61. doi: 10.1075/is.14.1.04lue Google Scholar
  95. Mandelbaum, J. (2012). Storytelling in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 492–507). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  96. Melis, A. P., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) strategic helping in a collaborative task. Biology Letters, 9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0009
  97. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Miller, P., & Garvey, C. (1984). Mother-baby role play: Its origins in social support. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play: The development of social understanding (pp. 101–130). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  99. Nelson, K., & Seidman, S. (1984). Playing with scripts. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play: The development of social understanding (pp. 45–71). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  100. Palagi, E. (2006). Social play in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129, 418–426. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20289 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Palagi, E. (2008). Sharing the motivation to play: The use of signals in adult bonobos. Animal Behaviour, 75, 887–896.Google Scholar
  102. Palagi, E., & Paoli, T. (2007). Play in adult bonobos (Pan paniscus): Modality and potential meaning. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 134, 219–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Palagi, E., Antonacci, D., & Cordoni, G. (2007). Fine-tuning of social play in juvenile lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 433–445. doi: 10.1002/dev.20219 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Palagi, E., Norscia, I., & Spada, G. (2014). Relaxed open mouth as a playful signal in wild ring-tailed lemurs. American Journal of Primatology, 76, 1074–1083. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22294 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Palagi, E., Burghardt, G. M., Smuts, B., Cordoni, G., Dall’Olio, S., Fouts, H. N.,…Pellis, S. M. (2015). Rough-and-tumble play as a window on animal communication. Biological Reviews, 91, 311–327. doi: 10.1111/brv.12172
  106. Pellis, S. M. (1984). Two aspects of play-fighting in a captive group of oriental small-clawed otters Amblonyx cinerea. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 65, 77–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1984.tb00374.x Google Scholar
  107. Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (1996). On knowing it’s only play: The role of play signals in play fighting. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1, 249–268. doi: 10.1016/1359-1789(95)00016-X Google Scholar
  108. Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (2016). Play fighting in Visayan warty pigs (Sus cebifrons): Insights on restraint and reciprocity in the maintenance of play. Behaviour, 153, 727–747. doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003346 Google Scholar
  109. Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (2017). What is play fighting and what is it good for? Learning & Behavior, 1–12. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0264-3
  110. Pika, S., & Zuberbühler, K. (2008). Social games between bonobos and humans: Evidence for shared intentionality? American Journal of Primatology, 70, 207–210. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20469 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Plooij, F. X. (1984). The behavioral development of free-living chimpanzee babies and infants (Monographs on Infancy). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  112. Pozis-Francois, O., Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (2004). Social play in Arabian babblers. Behaviour, 141, 425–450. doi: 10.1163/156853904323066720 Google Scholar
  113. Preuschoft, S. (1992). “Laughter” and “smile” in barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Ethology, 91, 220–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00864.x Google Scholar
  114. Pruitt, C. H. (1976). Play and agonistic behavior in young captive black bears. Bears: Their Biology and Management, 3, 79–86. doi: 10.2307/3872757 Google Scholar
  115. Rakoczy, H. (2006). Pretend play and the development of collective intentionality. Cognition, Joint Action and Collective Intentionality, 7, 113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.11.008 Google Scholar
  116. Rakoczy, H. (2008). Pretence as individual and collective intentionality. Mind & Language, 23, 499–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00357.x Google Scholar
  117. Rakoczy, H., & Schmidt, M. F. H. (2013). The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 17–21. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12010 Google Scholar
  118. Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). The sources of normativity: Young children’s awareness of the normative structure of games. Developmental Psychology, 44, 875–881. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.875 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Ramani, G. B., & Brownell, C. A. (2013). Preschoolers’ cooperative problem solving: Integrating play and problem solving. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 12, 92–108. doi: 10.1177/1476718X13498337 Google Scholar
  120. Reddish, P., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Let’s dance together: Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PLoS ONE, 8, e71182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071182 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. Rossano, F. (2013). Sequence organization and timing of bonobo mother-infant interactions. Interaction Studies, 14, 160–189. doi: 10.1075/is.14.2.02ros Google Scholar
  122. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi: 10.2307/412243 Google Scholar
  123. Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Georgetown university round table on languages and linguistics 1981 (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  124. Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 185–211. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_2 Google Scholar
  125. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 Google Scholar
  126. Schwartzman, H. B. (1978). Transformations: The anthropology of children’s play. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  127. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 353–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  130. Sluckin, A. (1981). Growing up in the playground: The social development of children (Vol. 51). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  131. Smiley, P. A. (2001). Intention understanding and partner-sensitive behaviors in young children’s peer interactions. Social Development, 10, 330–354. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00169 Google Scholar
  132. Smith, P. K. (1997). Play fighting and real fighting. In A. Schmitt, K. Atzwanger, K. Grammer, & K. Schäfer (Eds.), New aspects of human ethology (pp. 47–64). Boston, MA: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-585-34289-4_3 Google Scholar
  133. Smith, P. K., & Boulton, M. (1990). Rough-and-tumble play, aggression and dominance: Perception and behaviour in children’s encounters. Human Development, 33, 271–282. doi: 10.1159/000276524 Google Scholar
  134. Smith, P. K., & Lewis, K. (1985). Rough-and-tumble play, fighting, and chasing in nursery school children. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 175–181. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(85)90029-9 Google Scholar
  135. Smith, P. K., Smees, R., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2004). Play fighting and real fighting: Using video playback methodology with young children. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 164–173. doi: 10.1002/ab.20013 Google Scholar
  136. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  137. Stambak, M., & Sinclair, H. (Eds.). (1990). Pretend play among 3-year-olds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  138. Stockinger Forys, S. K., & McCune-Nicolich, L. (1984). Shared pretend: Sociodramatic play at 3 years of age. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play: The development of social understanding (pp. 159–191). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  139. Tanner, J. E. (2004). Gestural phrases and gestural exchanges by a pair of zoo-living lowland gorillas. Gesture, 4, 1–24. doi: 10.1075/gest.4.1.02tan Google Scholar
  140. Tanner, J. E., & Byrne, R. W. (2010). Triadic and collaborative play by gorillas in social games with objects. Animal Cognition, 13, 591–607. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0308-y PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2005). Intention reading and imitative learning. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 133–148). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  142. Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10, 121–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Tomasello, M., & Moll, H. (2010). The gap is social: Human shared intentionality and culture. In P. M. Kappeler & J. B. Silk (Eds.), Mind the gap: Tracing the origins of human universals (pp. 331–349). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  144. Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Hare, B. (1998). Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1063–1069. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0636 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Hobson, R. P. (2005). The emergence of social cognition in three young chimpanzees. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70, i–152.Google Scholar
  147. Tomonaga, M., Tanaka, M., Matsuzawa, T., Myowa‐Yamakoshi, M., Kosugi, D., Mizuno, Y.,…Bard, K. A. (2004). Development of social cognition in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Face recognition, smiling, gaze, and the lack of triadic interactions. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 227–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5584.2004.00254.x
  148. Verba, M. (1994). The beginnings of collaboration in peer interaction. Human Development, 37, 125–139.Google Scholar
  149. Vesper, C., Abramova, E., Bütepage, J., Ciardo, F., Crossey, B., Effenberg, A.,…Nijssen, S. (2016). Joint action: Mental representations, shared information and general mechanisms for coordinating with others. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02039
  150. Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5, 6–18. doi: 10.2753/RPO1061-040505036 Google Scholar
  151. Waller, B. M., & Cherry, L. (2012). Facilitating play through communication: Significance of teeth exposure in the gorilla play face. American Journal of Primatology, 74, 157–164. doi: 10.1002/ajp.21018 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311, 1301. doi: 10.1126/science.1121448 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Warneken, F., Chen, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. Child Development, 77, 640–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00895.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Warneken, F., Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Hanus, D., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology, 5, e184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050184 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. Watson, D. M. (1998). Kangaroos at play: Play behaviour in the Macropodoidea. In M. Bekoff & J. A. Byers (Eds.), Animal play: Evolutionary, comparative, and ecological perspectives (pp. 61–95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  156. Watson, D. M., & Croft, D. B. (1993). Playfighting in captive red-necked wallabies, Macropus rufogriseus banksianus. Behaviour, 126, 219–245. doi: 10.1163/156853993X00128 Google Scholar
  157. Watson, D. M., & Croft, D. B. (1996). Age-related differences in playfighting strategies of captive male red-necked wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus banksianus). Ethology, 102, 336–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01129.x Google Scholar
  158. Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (Eds.). (2008). The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raphaela Heesen
    • 1
  • Emilie Genty
    • 1
  • Federico Rossano
    • 2
  • Klaus Zuberbühler
    • 3
    • 4
  • Adrian Bangerter
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Work and Organizational PsychologyUniversity of NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Cognitive ScienceUniversity of California San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Comparative CognitionUniversity of NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  4. 4.School of Psychology and NeuroscienceUniversity of St AndrewsScotlandUK

Personalised recommendations