Learning & Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 441–448 | Cite as

The evolutionary significance of pretend play: Two-year-olds’ interpretation of behavioral cues

Article

Abstract

Pretend play begins very early in human life. A key question is why, when figuring out reality is young children’s major developmental task, they engage in its deliberate falsification. A second key question is how children know that pretend events are not real. Here we report three experiments addressing the latter question and providing indirect evidence for speculation on the first question. Children (N = 96) were shown actors eating or pretending to eat from covered bowls, and they had to indicate, on the basis of the actors’ behavioral signs, which actor was pretending to eat or had the real food. Even 24-month-olds could do so when the contents of the bowls were shown before the actions, and even when substitute objects were shown. However, when one of the bowls contained imaginary objects (i.e., was empty), even 30-month-olds could not indicate which actor was pretending. These studies show how the ability to interpret pretending from behavioral cues develops gradually as children’s representational abilities become more free of contextual support. We propose that, from an evolutionary and ontogenetic standpoint, pretend play might serve to heighten children’s sensitivity to social signs. This sensitivity could assist the development of theory of mind, with which social pretend play is associated. In this way, pretend play in humans might serve a similar purpose to play fighting in other species: In both cases, play might sensitize the organism to social signs that will allow for sophisticated coordination of social behavior later in life.

Keywords

Play Symbolic representation Behavioral cues Social sensitizer Children 

References

  1. Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1995). Theory of mind development and social understanding. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 151–165. doi: 10.1080/02699939508409006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. A. (1972). A theory of play and fantasy. In G. A. Bateson (Ed.), Steps to an ecology of mind (pp. 177–193). New York: Chandler.Google Scholar
  3. Bekoff, M. (1995). Play signals as punctuation: The structure of social play in canids. Behaviour, 132, 419–429. doi: 10.1163/156853995X00649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boulton, M. J. (1996). A comparison of 8- and 11-year-old girls’ and boys’ participation in specific types of rough-and-tumble play and aggressive fighting: Implications for functional hypotheses. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bretherton, I., Bates, E., McNew, S., Shore, C., Williamson, C., & Beeghly-Smith, M. (1981). Comprehension and production of symbols in infancy: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 17, 728–736. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.6.728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchsbaum, D., Bridgers, S., Weisberg, D. S., & Gopnik, A. (2012). The power of possibility: Causal learning, counterfactual reasoning, and pretend play. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 2202–2212. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Lillard, A. S. (2015). How is theory of mind useful? Perhaps to enable social pretend play. Frontiers in Cognitive Science, 6(1559), 1–4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01559 Google Scholar
  8. Einon, D. F., & Morgan, M. (1977). A critical period for social isolation in the rat. Developmental Psychobiology, 10, 123–132. doi: 10.1002/dev.420100205 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Einon, D. F., & Potegal, M. (1991). Enhanced defense in adult rats deprived of playfighting experience as juveniles. Aggressive Behavior, 17, 27–40. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1991)17:1<27::AID-AB2480170105>3.0.CO;2-B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elder, J. L., & Pederson, D. R. (1978). Preschool children’s use of objects in symbolic play. Child Development, 49, 500–504. doi: 10.2307/1128716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fagen, R. (1981). Animal play behavior. Oxford: New York.Google Scholar
  12. Gaskins, S. (2013). Pretend play as culturally constructed activity. In M. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the imagination (pp. 224–247). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Göncü, A., Mistry, J., & Mosier, C. (2000). Cultural variations in the play of toddlers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 321–329. doi: 10.1080/01650250050118303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haight, W., & Miller, P. J. (1992). The development of everyday pretend play: A longitudinal study of mothers’ participation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 331–349.Google Scholar
  15. Haight, W., & Miller, P. J. (1993). Pretending at home. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  16. Harris, P. L., & Kavanaugh, R. D. (1993). Young children’s understanding of pretense. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(1, Serial No. 231), 1–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoicka, E., & Butcher, J. (2015). Parents produce explicit cues that help toddlers distinguish joking and pretending. Cognitive Science, 40, 941–971. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12264 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackowitz, E. R., & Watson, M. W. (1980). The development of object transformations in early pretend play. Developmental Psychology, 16, 543–549. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.16.6.543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kavanaugh, R. D., Whittington, S., & Cerbone, M. J. (1983). Mothers’ use of fantasy speech to young children. Journal of Child Language, 10, 45–55. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900005122 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Knutson, B., Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (1998). Anticipation of play elicits high-frequency ultrasonic vocalizations in young rats. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 65–73. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.1.65 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lancy, D. F. (2007). Accounting for variability in mother-child play. American Anthropologist, 109, 273–284. doi: 10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lillard, A. S. (2015). The development of play. In L. S. Liben & U. Mueller (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Cognitive processes (7th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 425–468). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Lillard, A. S. (2017). Why do the children (pretend) play? Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  26. Lillard, A. S., Nishida, T., Massaro, D., Vaish, A., Ma, L., & McRoberts, G. (2007). Signs of pretense across age and scenario. Infancy, 11, 1–30. doi: 10.1080/15250000709336868 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Lillard, A. S., & Witherington, D. (2004). Mothers’ behavior modifications during pretense snacks and their possible signal value for toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 40, 95–113. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.95 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma, L., & Lillard, A. S. (2006). Where is the real cheese? Young children’s ability to discriminate between real and pretend acts. Child Development, 77, 1762–1777. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00972.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ma, L., & Lillard, A. S. (2013). What makes an act a pretense one? Young children’s pretend-real judgments and explanations. Child Development Research, 2013. doi: 10.1155/2013/467872
  30. Mitchell, R. W. (Ed.). (2002). Pretending and imagination in animal and children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mitchell, R. W., & Clark, H. (2015). Experimenter’s pantomimes influence children’s use of body part as object and imaginary object pantomimes: A replication. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 703–718. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2014.926270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakamichi, N. (2015). Maternal behavior modifications during pretense and their long-term effects on toddlers’ understanding of pretense. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 541–558. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2014.926271 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nishida, T. K., & Lillard, A. S. (2007). The informative value of emotional expressions: “Social referencing” in mother–child pretense. Developmental Science, 10, 205–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00581.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Pederson, D. R., Rook-Green, A., & Elder, J. L. (1981). The role of action in the development of pretend play in young children. Developmental Psychology, 17, 756–759. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.6.756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pellis, S. M., Burghardt, G. M., Palagi, E., & Mangel, M. (2015). Modeling play: Distinguishing between origins and current functions. Adaptive Behavior, 23, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (2007). Rough-and-tumble play and the development of the social brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (2009). The playful brain: Venturing to the limits of neuroscience. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
  38. Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (2016). Play and cognition: The final frontier. In M. Olmstead (Ed.), Animal cognition: Principles, evolution, and development (pp. 201–230). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton. G. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson, Trans. Google Scholar
  40. Richert, R. A., & Lillard, A. S. (2004). Observers’ proficiency at identifying pretense acts based on behavioral cues. Cognitive Development, 19, 223–240. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.01.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Slade, A. (1987). A longitudinal study of maternal involvement and symbolic play during the toddler period. Child Development, 58, 367–375. doi: 10.2307/1130513 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson, M. W., & Fischer, K. W. (1977). A developmental sequence of agent use in late infancy. Child Development, 48, 828–836. doi: 10.2307/1128331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Watson, M. W., & Jackowitz, E. R. (1984). Agents and recipient objects in the development of early symbolic play. Child Development, 55, 1091–1097. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1984.tb03847.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Youngblade, L. M., & Dunn, J. (1995). Individual differences in young children’s pretend play with mother and sibling: Links to relationships and understanding of other people’s feelings and beliefs. Child Development, 66, 1472–1492. doi: 10.2307/1131658 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations