Learning & Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 367–377 | Cite as

The influence of breed and environmental factors on social and solitary play in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)

  • Lindsay R. Mehrkam
  • Nathaniel J. Hall
  • Chelsea Haitz
  • Clive D. L. Wynne
Article

Abstract

The domestic dog is an ideal model species in which to study the genetic and environmental factors that influence play behavior. Dogs exist in a wide variety of breeds and frequently engage in multiple forms of play. In the present study, we investigated whether the levels of solitary and social play differed between dogs of three breed types with distinct predatory motor pattern sequences (herding dogs, retrievers, and livestock guarding dogs [LGDs]). Furthermore, we investigated how environmental factors (social and nonsocial contexts) influenced play in dogs of these breed types. Groups of breed-matched dyads with working experience and of equivalent age, sex, and neuter status ratios were exposed to four experimental test conditions and two control conditions in randomized orders. With respect to solitary play, environmental context did have a significant effect, with toys reliably producing the highest levels of solitary play across all breed types. Retrievers engaged in significantly higher levels of solitary play overall than LGDs, and there was a trend in comparison to herding dogs. In contrast, neither environmental context nor breed had a significant effect on social play levels; however, neuter status of the dyads did have a significant effect on social play, with mixed-status dyads engaging in significantly higher levels of social play than same-status dyads. Our findings provide experimental evidence for identifying proximate, environmental stimuli that reliably facilitate social and solitary play and discuss possible genetic (i.e., breed type) and lifetime influences on the form of play in domestic dogs.

Keywords

Social play Solitary play Dog Breed Predatory motor pattern Environmental Proximate mechanism Toy Attention 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the dogs and dog owners who volunteered their time to make this study possible. We also thank Tori Self, Cassandra Vazquez, and Ryan Talbot for assistance with data collection and behavioral coding. We also thank Jane Brockmann, Timothy Vollmer, Jesse Dallery, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this manuscript.

References

  1. Ahloy Dallaire, J., & Mason, G. J. (2016). Play in juvenile mink: Litter effects, stability over time, and motivational heterogeneity. Developmental Psychobiology, 58, 945–957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. American Kennel Club. (2007). The complete dog book (20th ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package Version 1.0-5). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  4. Bauer, E. B., & Smuts, B. B. (2007). Cooperation and competition during dyadic play in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behavior, 73, 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beatty, W. W., Dodge, A. M., Dodge, L. J., White, K., & Panksepp, J. (1982). Psychomotor stimulants, social deprivation and play in juvenile rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 16, 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bekoff, M. (1995). Play signals as punctuation: The structure of social play in canids. Behavior, 132, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bekoff, M. (2001). Social play behavior: Cooperation, fairness, trust, and the evolution of morality. Journal of Conscious Studies, 8, 81–90.Google Scholar
  8. Bekoff, M., & Byers, J. (1998). Animal play: Evolutionary, comparative, and ecological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradshaw, J. W. S., Pullen, A. J., & Rooney, N. J. (2015). Why do adult dogs “play”? Behavioral Processes, 110, 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brueggeman, J. A. (1978). The function of adult play in free-living Macaca mulatta. In E. O. Smith (Ed.), Social play in primates (pp. 169–192). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burghardt, G. (2005). The genesis of animal play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burghardt, G.M., Albright, J.D., & Davis, K.M. (2016). Motivation, development and object play: comparative perspectives with lessons from dogs. Behaviour 153, 767-793.Google Scholar
  13. Coppinger, R., & Coppinger, L. (2001). Dogs: A new understanding of canine origin, behavior and evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coppinger, R., & Schneider, R. (1995). The evolution of working dogs. In J. S. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behavior and interactions with people (pp. 21–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cordoni, G. (2009). Social play in captive wolves (Canis lupus): Not only an immature affair. Behavior, 146, 1363–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Haan, J. A. (1952). The play of a young solitary chimpanzee. Behavior, 4, 144–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dugatkin, L. A. (2013). Principles of animal behavior: Third international (studentth ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Fagen, R. (1981). Animal play behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, S. (1998). Object play by adult animals. In M. Bekoff & J. Byers (Eds.), Animal play: Evolutionary, comparative, and ecological perspectives (pp. 45–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, S., & Bradshaw, J. W. S. (1998). The influence of hunger on object play by adult domestic cats. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 58, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harcourt, R. (1991). Survivorship costs of play in the South American fur seal. Animal Behavior, 42, 509–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hinde, R. A. (1974). Biological basis of human social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Horowitz, A. C. (2009). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use visual attention cues when play signaling. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 4, 53–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Humphreys, A. P., & Einon, D. F. (1981). Play as a reinforcer for maze-learning in juvenile rats. Animal Behavior, 29, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, B., & Christensen, H.B. (2013). LmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) (R package version 2.0-3). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
  26. Martin, P., & Caro, T. M. (1985). On the functions of play and its role in behavioral development. In J. S. Rosenblatt, C. Beer, M.-C. Busnel, & P. J. B. Slater (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 15, pp. 59–103). New York: Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065345408604878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mehrkam, L. R., Verdi, N. L., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2014). Human interaction as environmental enrichment for pair-housed wolves and wolf-dog hybrids. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 17, 43–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mehrkam, L. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2014). Behavioral differences among breeds of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris): Current status of the science. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 155, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nelson, R. J. (2005). Introduction to behavioral endocrinology (3rd ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  30. Olioff, M., & Stewart, J. (1978). Sex differences in the play behavior of prepubescent rats. Physiology & Behavior, 20, 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palagi, E. (2007). Play at work: Revisiting data focusing on chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 85, 63–81.Google Scholar
  32. Pellis, S. M. (1991). How motivationally distinct is play? A preliminary case study. Animal Behaviour, 42, 851–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pellis, S. M., & Iwaniuk, A. N. (2004). Evolving a playful brain: A levels of control approach. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 17, 92–118.Google Scholar
  34. Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (1996). On knowing it’s only play: The role of play signals in play fighting. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pellis, S. M., Pellis, V. C., & Kolb, B. (1992). Neonatal testosterone augmentation increases juvenile play fighting but does not influence adult dominance relationships in male rats. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pullen, A. J., (2011). Behavioural indicators of candidate enrichments for kennel housed dogs (Doctoral dissertation, University of Bristol). Retrieved from http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.535234
  37. Rooney, N. J., Bradshaw, J. W. S., & Robinson, I. H. (2000). A comparison of dog–dog and dog–human play behavior. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 66, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rooney, N. J., Bradshaw, J. W. S., & Robinson, I. H. (2001). Do dogs respond to play signals given by humans? Animal Behavior, 61, 715–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell, E. S. (1936). Playing with a dog. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 11, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siviy, S. M. (2016). A brain motivated to play: Insights into the neurobiology of playfulness. Behaviour, 153, 819–844.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, P. K. (1982). Does play matter? Functional and evolutionary aspects of animal and human play. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 139–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, L. K., Fantella, S.-L. N., & Pellis, S. M. (1999). Playful defensive responses in adult male rats depend on the status of the unfamiliar opponent. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2011). Can your dog read your mind? Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking. Learning & Behavior, 39, 289–302. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0034-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Udell, M. A. R., Ewald, M., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2014). Exploring breed differences in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris): Does exaggeration or inhibition of predatory response predict performance on human-guided tasks? Animal Behavior, 89, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J., Acterberg, E. J. M., & Trezza, V. (2016). The neurobiology of social play and its rewarding value in rats. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ward, C., Bauer, E. B., & Smuts, B. B. (2008). Partner preferences and asymmetries in social play among domestic dog, Canis lupus familiaris, littermates. Animal Behavior, 76, 1187–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsay R. Mehrkam
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nathaniel J. Hall
    • 2
    • 3
  • Chelsea Haitz
    • 3
  • Clive D. L. Wynne
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMonmouth UniversityWest Long BranchUSA
  2. 2.Department of Animal and Food SciencesTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations