Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 1485–1498 | Cite as

Emotion-induced blindness reflects competition at early and late processing stages: An ERP study

  • Briana L. KennedyEmail author
  • Jennifer Rawding
  • Steven B. Most
  • James E. Hoffman


Emotion-induced blindness (EIB) refers to impaired awareness of items appearing soon after an irrelevant, emotionally arousing stimulus. Superficially, EIB appears to be similar to the attentional blink (AB), a failure to report a target that closely follows another relevant target. Previous studies of AB using event-related potentials suggest that the AB results from interference with selection (N2 component) and consolidation (P3b component) of the second target into working memory. The present study applied a similar analysis to EIB and, similarly, found that an irrelevant emotional distractor suppressed the N2 and P3b components associated with the following target at short lags. Emotional distractors also elicited a positive deflection that appeared to be similar to the PD component, which has been associated with attempts to suppress salient, irrelevant distractors (Kiss, Grubert, Petersen, & Eimer, 2012; Sawaki, Geng, & Luck, 2012; Sawaki & Luck, 2010). These results suggest that irrelevant emotional pictures gain access to working memory, even when observers are attempting to ignore them and, like the AB, prevent access of a closely following target.


Emotion Attention ERP 



This work was supported by NIH grant R03 MH091526 to S.B.M. and NSF grant BCS-1059560 to J.E.H. We wish to thank Matthew Doran, Scott McLean, and Lingling Wang for helpful discussions about this project.


  1. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cardinal, R. N., & Aitken, M. R. F. (2006). ANOVA for the behavioral sciences researcher. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 109–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dell’Acqua, R., Jolicoeur, P., Luria, R., & Pluchino, P. (2009). Reevaluating encoding-capacity limitations as a cause of the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 338–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dien, J. (2010). The ERP PCA Toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187(1), 138–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2009). The attentional blink: A review of data and theory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(8), 1683–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dux, P. E., Asplund, C. L., & Marois, R. (2009). Both exogenous and endogenous target salience manipulations support resource depletion accounts of the attentional blink: A reply to Olivers et al. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(1), 219–224.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flaisch, T., Junghöfer, M., Bradley, M. M., Schupp, H. T., & Lang, P. J. (2008). Rapid picture processing: Affective primes and targets. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Foti, D., Hajcak, G., & Dien, J. (2009). Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Psychophysiology, 46(3), 521–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keil, A., Debener, S., Gratton, G., Junghöfer, M., Kappenman, E. S., Luck, S. J., ⋯ Yee, C. M. (2014). Committee report: Publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Psychophysiology, 51(1), 1-21.Google Scholar
  11. Kiss, M., Grubert, A., Petersen, A., & Eimer, M. (2012). Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(3), 749–759.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kranczioch, C., Debener, S., Maye, A., & Engel, A. K. (2007). Temporal dynamics of access to consciousness in the attentional blink. NeuroImage, 37(3), 947–955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2001). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech. Rep. No. A-5). Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.Google Scholar
  14. Luck, S. J. (2011). Electrophysiological Correlates of the Focusing of Attention within Complex Visual Scenes: N2pc and Related Electrophysiological Correlates. In S. J. Luck & E. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 1000–1014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 432–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martens, S., & Wyble, B. (2010). The attentional blink: Past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(6), 947–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Most, S. B., Chun, M. M., Widders, D. M., & Zald, D. H. (2005). Attentional rubbernecking: Cognitive control and personality in emotion-induced blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 654–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olivers, C. N. L., van der Stigchel, S., & Hulleman, J. (2007). Spreading the sparing: Against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink. Psychological Research, 71, 126–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peyk, P., Schupp, H. T., Keil, A., Elbert, T., & Junghöfer, M. (2009). Parallel processing of affective visual stimuli. Psychophysiology, 46(1), 200–208.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., ⋯ Taylor, M. J. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophys, 37(2), 127-152.Google Scholar
  23. Polich, J. (2012). Neuropsychology of P300. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), Handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 159–188). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Reiss, J. E., Hoffman, J. E., Heyward, F. D., Doran, M. M., & Most, S. B. (2008). ERP evidence for temporary loss of control during the attentional blink. Naples: Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society.Google Scholar
  25. Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sawaki, R., Geng, J. J., & Luck, S. J. (2012). A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(31), 10725–10736.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2003a). Attention and emotion: An ERP analysis of facilitated emotional stimulus processing. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 14(8), 1107–1110.Google Scholar
  28. Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2003b). Emotional facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex. Psychological Science, 14(1), 7–13. Elsevier.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schupp, H.T., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J., & Junghöfer, M. (2006). Emotion and attention: Event-related brain potential studies. In Anders, Ende, Junghöfer, Kissler, & Wildgruber (Eds.), Prog Brain Res, Vol. 156 pp. 31-51.Google Scholar
  30. Sergent, C., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1391–1400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shapiro, K., Schmitz, F., Martens, S., Hommel, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2006). Resource sharing in the attentional blink. NeuroReport, 17(2), 163–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheppard, D. M., Duncan, J., Shapiro, K. L., & Hillstrom, A. P. (2002). Objects and events in the attentional blink. Psychological Science, 13, 410–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (2001). Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Late ERP Responses to Deviant Stimuli. Psychophysiology, 38, 343–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 739–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for postperceptual suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1656–1674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, L., Kennedy, B. L., & Most, S. B. (2012). When emotion blinds: A spatiotemporal competition account of emotion-induced blindness. Frontiers Psychology: Special Topic on Emotion and Cognition, 3, 438.Google Scholar
  37. Weinberg, A., & Hajcak, G. (2011). The late positive potential predicts subsequent interference with target processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2994–3007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodman, G. F., Arita, J. T., & Luck, S. J. (2009). A cuing study of the N2pc component: An index of attentional deployment to objects rather than spatial locations. Brain Research, 1297, 101–111.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Briana L. Kennedy
    • 1
  • Jennifer Rawding
    • 2
  • Steven B. Most
    • 1
    • 3
  • James E. Hoffman
    • 3
  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations