Processing within the dorsal visual stream subserves object-directed action, whereas visual object recognition is mediated by the ventral visual stream. Recent findings suggest that the computations performed by the dorsal stream can nevertheless influence object recognition. Little is known, however, about the type of dorsal stream information that is available to assist in object recognition. Here, we present a series of experiments that explored different psychophysical manipulations known to bias the processing of a stimulus toward the dorsal visual stream in order to isolate its contribution to object recognition. We show that elongated-shaped stimuli, regardless of their semantic category and familiarity, when processed by the dorsal stream, elicit visuomotor grasp-related information that affects how we categorize manipulable objects. Elongated stimuli may reduce ambiguity during grasp preparation by providing a coarse cue to hand shaping and orientation that is sufficient to support action planning. We propose that this dorsal-stream-based analysis of elongation along a principal axis is the basis for how the dorsal visual object processing stream can affect categorization of manipulable objects.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abernethy, M., & Coney, J. (1993). Associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres as a function of SOA. Neuropsychologia, 31, 1397–1409.
Almeida, J., Fintzi, A., & Mahon, B.Z. (2013). Tool Manipulation Knowledge is Retrieved by way of the Ventral Visual Object Processing Pathway. Cortex, 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.004 DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.05.004#doilink
Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychological Science, 21(6), 772–778.
Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(39), 15214–15218.
Almeida, J., Pajtas, P. E., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2013). Affect of the unconscious: Visually suppressed angry faces modulate our decisions. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 94–101.
Batista, A. P., Buneo, C. A., Snyder, L. H., & Andersen, R. A. (1999). Reach plans in eye-centered coordinates. Science, 285, 257–260.
Blake, A. (1992). Computational modelling of hand-eye coordination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 337(1281), 351–360.
Boronat, C. B., Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Tang, K., Saffran, E. M., Kimberg, D. Y., et al. (2005). Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(2–3), 361–373.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1572–1595.
Bub, D. N., & Lewine, J. (1988). Different modes of word recognition in the left and right visual fields. Brain and Language, 33, 161–188.
Buxbaum, L. J., Kyle, K. M., Grossman, M., & Coslett, H. B. (2007). Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: Evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex, 43(3), 411–23.
Cant, J. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2007). Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 713–731.
Carey, D. P., Harvey, M., & Milner, A. D. (1996). Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 34(5), 329–337.
Chao, L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478–484.
Chiarello, C., Nuding, S., & Pollock, A. (1988). Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: Influence of response selection and response bias. Brain and Language, 34, 302–314.
Connolly, J. D., Andersen, R. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). FMRI evidence for a “parietal reach region” in the human brain. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 140–145.
Culham, J. C., Cavina-Pratesi, C., & Singhal, A. (2006). The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2668–84.
Culham, J. C., Danckert, S., Souza, J. X. D., Gati, J., Menon, R., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 180–189.
Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Grabowski, T., Adolphs, R., & Damasio, A. (2004). Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition, 92, 179–229.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., & Rivière, D. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4(7), 752–758.
Desmurget, M., Epstein, C. M., Turner, R. S., Prablanc, C., Alexander, G. E., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 563–567.
Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1380–1385.
Finkbeiner, M., Almeida, J., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Letter identification processes in reading: Distractor interference reveals a left-lateralized domain-specific mechanism. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1083–1103.
Finkbeiner, M., & Friedman, J. (2011). The flexibility of nonconsciously deployed cognitive processes: Evidence from masked congruence priming. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e17095. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017095
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116–124.
Garcea, F. E., Almeida, J., & Mahon, B. Z. (2012). A right visual field advantage for visual processing of manipulable objects. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(4), 813–25.
Goldenberg, G., & Spatt, J. (2009). The neural basis of tool use. Brain, 132(6), 1645–1655.
Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., Milner, A. D., & Perrett, D. I. (1994a). The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 46–56.
Goodale, M. A., Meenan, J. P., Bülthoff, H. H., Nicolle, D. A., Murphy, K. J., & Racicot, C. I. (1994b). Separate visual pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, 4, 604–610.
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25.
Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320(6064), 748–50.
Grill-Spector, K., Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research, 41(10–11), 1409–1422.
Haaland, K. Y., Harrington, D. L., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain, 123, 2306–2313.
Handy, T. C., Grafton, S. T., Shroff, N. M., Ketay, S., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2003). Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 421–427.
Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174(2), 221–228.
Hesselmann, G., & Malach, R. (2011). The link between fMRI-BOLD activation and perceptual awareness is 'stream-invariant' in the human visual system. Cerebral Cortex, 21(12), 2829–37.
Hunter, Z. R., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). Visual half-field experiments are a good measure of cerebral language dominance if used properly: Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 46, 316–325.
Iberall, T., Bingham, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1986). Opposition Space as a Structuring Concept for the Analysis of Skilled Hand Movements. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and Modulation of Action Patterns (pp. 158–173). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron, 35(4), 793–801.
Jiang, Y., & He, S. (2006). Cortical responses to invisible faces: Dissociating subsystems for facial-information processing. Current Biology, 16, 2023–2029.
Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 71–78.
Johnson-Frey, S., Newman-Norland, R., & Grafton, S. (2005). A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 681–695.
Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M., & Patterson, K. (2003). Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 20–46.
Klatzky, R. L., McCloskey, B., Doherty, S., Pellegrino, J., & Smith, T. (1987). Knowledge about hand shaping and knowledge about objects. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 187–213.
Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2000). Semantic priming by pictures and words in the cerebral hemispheres. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 91–98.
Lederman, S. J., & Wing, A. M. (2003). Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 156–165.
Lewis, J. W. (2006). Cortical networks related to human use of tools. The Neuroscientist, 12(3), 211–231.
Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245(4919), 761–763.
Lovseth, K., & Atchley, R. A. (2010). Examining lateralized semantic access using pictures. Brain & Cognition, 2, 202–209.
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2005). The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 480–494.
Mahon, B., Kumar, N., & Almeida, J. (2013). Spatial frequency tuning reveals visuomotor interactions between the dorsal and ventral visual systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(6), 862–871. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00370
Mahon, B. Z., Milleville, S., Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R. I., Caramazza, A., & Martin, A. (2007). Action-related properties of objects shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron, 55(3), 507–520.
Mahon, B. Z., & Wu, W. (in press). Cognitive Penetration of the Dorsal Visual Stream? In J. Zeimbekis & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Cognitive Penetration. Oxford University Press
Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45.
Miceli, G., Fouch, E., Capasso, R., Shelton, J. R., Tamaiuolo, F., & Caramazza, A. (2001). The dissociation of color from form and function knowledge. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 662–667.
Miller, E. K., Nieder, A., Freedman, D. J., & Wallis, J. D. (2003). Neural correlates of categories and concepts. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(2), 198–203.
Murata, A., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000). Selectivity for the shape, size and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83(5), 2580–2601.
Noppeney, U., Price, C., Penny, W., & Friston, K. (2006). Two distinct neural mechanisms for category selective responses. Cerebral Cortex, 16(3), 437–445.
Pasley, B. N., Mayes, L. C., & Schultz, R. T. (2004). Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuron, 42, 163–172.
Perenin, M. T., & Vighetto, A. (1988). Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms i. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain, 111(3), 643–674.
Prado, J., Clavagnier, S., Otzenberger, H., Scheiber, C., Kennedy, H., & Perenin, M. T. (2005). Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision. Neuron, 48(5), 849–58.
Rolls, E. T., & Tovee, M. J. (1994). Processing speed in the cerebral-cortex and the neurophysiology of visual masking. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 257(1348), 9–15.
Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Sakata, H., Taira, M., Kusunoki, M., Murata, A., Tanaka, Y., & Tsutsui, K. (1998). Neural coding of 3D features of objects for hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353(1373), 1363–1373.
Shikata, E., Hamzei, F., Glauche, V., Knab, R., Dettmers, C., Weiller, C., & Buchel, C. (2001). Surface orientation discrimination activates caudal and anterior intraparietal sulcus in humans: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 1309–1314.
Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R., & Poncet, M. (1991). The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. Brain, 114, 2555–2573.
Song, J., & Nakayama, K. (2008). Numeric comparison in a visually-guided manual reaching task. Cognition, 106, 994–1003.
Sterzer, P., Haynes, J. D., & Rees, G. (2008). Fine-scale activity patterns within high-level ventral visual areas encode the category of invisible objects. Journal of Vision, 8(15), 1–12.
Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753–759.
Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1319–1327.
Tsuchiya, N., & Koch, C. (2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1096–1101.
Yang, E., & Blake, R. (2012). Deconstructing continuous flash suppression. Journal of Vision, 12(3), 1–14.
We thank M. Clara Barata and Thomas McKeeff for their comments on earlier versions of the manuscript and Matthew Finkbeiner and Jason Friedman for their help with the analysis of reach trajectories. J.A. was supported by funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement PCOFUND-GA-2009-246542 and from the Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal. J.A., A.D., and J.F.M. were sponsored by a Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal Project Grant PTDC/PSI-PCO/114822/2009. A.C. was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant R01 DC006842 and by the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Trento e Rovereto. B.Z.M. was supported in part by R21 NS076176 from NINDS. This research was supported by Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal Project Grant PTDC/PSI-PCO/114822/2009.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(PDF 1545 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Almeida, J., Mahon, B.Z., Zapater-Raberov, V. et al. Grasping with the eyes: The role of elongation in visual recognition of manipulable objects. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 14, 319–335 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0208-0
- Dorsal stream
- Object recognition
- Object elongation