In foraging tasks, multiple targets must be found within a single display. The targets can be of one or more types, typically surrounded by numerous distractors. Visual attention has traditionally been studied with single target search tasks, but adding more targets to the search display results in several additional measures of interest, such as how attention is oriented to different features and locations over time. We measured foraging among five age groups: Children in Grades 1, 4, 7, and 10, as well as adults, using both simple feature foraging tasks and more challenging conjunction foraging tasks, with two target types per task. We assessed participants’ foraging organization, or systematicity when selecting all the targets within the foraging display, on four measures: Intertarget distance, number of intersections, best-r, and the percentage above optimal path length (PAO). We found that foraging organization increases with age, in both simple feature-based foraging and more complex foraging for targets defined by feature conjunctions, and that feature foraging was more organized than conjunction foraging. Separate analyses for different target types indicated that children’s, and to some extent adults’, conjunction foraging consisted of two relatively organized foraging paths through the display where one target type is exhaustively selected before the other target type is selected. Lastly, we found that the development of foraging organization is closely related to the development of other foraging measures. Our results suggest that measuring foraging organization is a promising avenue for further research into the development of visual orienting.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adler, S. A., & Orprecio, J. (2006). The eyes have it: Visual pop-out in infants and adults. Developmental Science, 9(2), 189–206.
Appelros, P., Karlsson, G. M., Seiger, A., & Nydevik, I. (2002). Neglect and anosognosia after first-ever stroke: Incidence and relationship to disability. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34(5), 215–220.
Benjamins, J. S., Dalmaijer, E. S., Ten Brink, A. F., Nijboer, T. C., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2019). Multi-target visual search organisation across the lifespan: Cancellation task performance in a large and demographically stratified sample of healthy adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 26(5), 731–748.
Bond, A. B. (1982). The bead game: Response strategies in free assortment. Human Factors, 24(1), 101–110.
Brucki, S. M. D., & Nitrini, R. (2008). Cancellation task in very low educated people. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(2), 139–147.
Burggraaf, R., van der Geest, J. N., Hooge, I. T. & Frens, M. A. (2019). Developmental changes in visual search are determined by changing visuospatial abilities and task repetition: A longitudinal study in adolescents. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 10(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2019.1627211.
Buxbaum, L. J., Ferraro, M. K., Veramonti, T., Farne, A., Whyte, J., Ladavas, E., ... Coslett, H. B. (2004). Hemispatial neglect: Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology, 62(5), 749–756.
Byrd, D. E., Touradji, P., Tang, M.-X., & Manly, J. T. (2004). Cancellation test performance in African American, Hispanic, and White elderly. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 401–411.
Cain, M. S., Vul, E., Clark, K., & Mitroff, S. R. (2012). A Bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1047–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440460
Dalmaijer, E. S., Li, K. M. S., Gorgoraptis, N., Leff, A. P., Cohen, D. L., Parton, A., . . . Malhotra, P. A. (2018). Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of single-dose guanfacine in unilateral neglect following stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 89(6), 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-317338
Dalmaijer, E. S., Van der Stigchel, S., Nijboer, T. C. W., Cornelissen, T. H. W., & Husain, M. (2015). CancellationTools: All-in-one software for administration and analysis of cancellation tasks. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1065–1075.
Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. In W. G. Koster (Ed. & Trans.), Attention and performance, II. (Original work published 1868).
Dukas, R., & Ellner, S. (1993). Information processing and prey detection. Ecology, 74, 1337–1346.
Fabrigoule, C., Rouch, I., Taberly, A., Letenneur, L., Commenges, D., Mazaux, J. M., … Dartigues, J. F. (1998). Cognitive process in preclinical phase of dementia. Brain, 121(1), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.1.135
Gainotti, G., Marra, C., & Villa, G. (2001). A double dissociation between accuracy and time of execution on attentional tasks in Alzheimer’s disease and multi-infarct dementia. Brain, 124(4), 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.4.731
Gerhardstein, P., & Rovee-Collier, C. (2002). The development of visual search in infants and very young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 194–215. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2001.2649
Gil-Gómez de Liaño, B. G. G., Quirós-Godoy, M., Pérez-Hernández, E., Cain, M., & Wolfe, J. (2018). Understanding visual search and foraging in cognitive development. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 635-635.
Graham, S. M., Joshi, A., & Pizlo, Z. (2000). The travelling salesman problem: A hierarchical model. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1191–1204.
Grubert, A., Indino, M., & Krummenacher, J. (2014). From features to dimensions: Cognitive and motor development in pop-out search in children and young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 519. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00519
Hommel, B., Li, K. Z., & Li, S. C. (2004). Visual search across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), Article 545.
Huang, L., & Pashler. H. (2005). Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search. Cognition, 94(3), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.006
Humphrey, D. G., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Age differences in visual search for feature, conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets. Psychology and Aging, 12(4), 704–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-79220.127.116.114
Husain, M., & Rorden, C. (2003). Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(1), 26–36.
Jóhannesson, Ó. I., Kristjánsson, Á., & Thornton, I. M. (2017). Are foraging patterns in humans related to working memory and inhibitory control? Japanese Psychological Research, 59, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12152
Jóhannesson, O. I., Thornton, I. M., Smith, I. J., Chetverikov, A., & Kristjánsson, A. (2016). Visual foraging with fingers and eye gaze. i-Perception, 7(2), Article 2041669516637279.
Kail, R. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501.
Kristjánsson, Á. (2015). Reconsidering visual search. i-Perception, 6(6), 2041669515614670.
Kristjánsson, Á., & Egeth, H. (2020). How feature integration theory integrated cognitive psychology, neurophysiology, and psychophysics. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(1), 7–23.
Kristjánsson, Á., Jóhannesson, Ó. I., & Thornton, I. M. (2014). Common attentional constraints in visual foraging. PLOS ONE, 9(6), e100752.
Kristjánsson, Á., Ólafsdóttir, I. M., & Kristjánsson, T. (2019). Visual foraging tasks provide new insights into the orienting of visual attention: Methodological considerations. In S. Pollmann (Ed.), Spatial learning and attention guidance. Neuromethods, 151. https://doi.org/10.1007/7657201921
Kristjánsson, T., Draschkow, D., Pálsson, Á., Haraldsson, D., Jónsson, P. Ö., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2020). Moving foraging into 3D: Feature versus conjunction-based foraging in virtual reality. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820937020
Kristjánsson, T., Thornton, I. M., Chetverikov, A., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2020). Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks. Cognition, 194, Article 104032.
Kristjánsson, T., Thornton, I. M., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2018). Time limits during visual foraging reveal flexible working memory templates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(6), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000517
Lobaugh, N. J., Cole, S., & Rovet, J. F. (1998). Visual search for features and conjunctions in development. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 52(4), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087293
Lowery, N., Ragland, J. D., Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., & Moberg, P. J. (2004). Normative data for the symbol cancellation test in young healthy adults. Applied Neuropsychology, 11(4), 218–221.
MacGregor, J. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (1996). Human performance on the traveling salesman problem. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 527–539.
MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (1999). Spatial and contextual factors in human performance on the travelling salesperson problem. Perception, 28(11), 1417–1427.
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657–672. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209351
Maljkovic, V. & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(7), 977-991. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206826
Mark, V. W., Woods, A. J., Ball, K. K., Roth, D. L., & Mennemeier, M. (2004). Disorganized search on cancellation is not a consequence of neglect. Neurology, 63(1), 78–84.
Merrill, E. C., & Lookadoo, R. (2004). Selective search for conjunctively defined targets by children and young adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 72–90.
Najemnik, J., & Geisler, W. (2005). Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature, 434, 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03390
Nijboer, T. C. W., Kollen, B. J., & Kwakkel, G. (2013). Time course of visuospatial neglect early after stroke: A longitudinal cohort study. Cortex, 49(8), 2021–2027
Ólafsdóttir, I. M., Gestsdóttir, S., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2019). Visual foraging and executive functions: A developmental perspective. Acta Psychologica, 193, 203-213.
Ólafsdóttir, I. M., Gestsdóttir, S., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2020). Age differences in foraging and executive functions: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 198, Article 104910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104910
Ólafsdóttir, I. M., Kristjánsson, T., Gestsdóttir, S., Jóhannesson, Ó. I., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2016). Understanding visual attention in childhood: Insights from a new visual foraging task. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 18.
Pashler, H. (1987). Target-distractor discriminability in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 285–292. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208228
Pelegrina, S., Molina, R., Rodríguez-Martínez, E. I., Linares, R., Gómez, C. M. (2020) Age-related changes in selection, recognition, updating and maintenance information in WM. An ERP study in children and adolescents. Biological Psychology, 157, Article 107977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107977
Perron, L. & Furnon, V. (2019). OR-Tools 7.2 [Computer software]. https://developers.google.com/optimization/.
Quirós-Godoy, M., Pérez-Hernández, E., Cain, M., Wolfe, J., & Gil-Gómez de Liaño, B. (2018). Individual differences in visual search and foraging in children. Journal of Vision, 18(10), Article 637.
Rojas-Benjumea, M. Á., Quintero-Gallego, E. A., Zozaya, L., Barriga-Paulino, C. I., & Gómez, C. M. (2013). Children cautious strategy and variable maturation time window for responding in a visual search task. Psychology, 4(1), 19–32.
Sævarsson, S., Jóelsdóttir, S., Hjaltason, H., & Kristjánsson, A. (2008). Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 46(4), 1161–1169.
Saykin, A. J., Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., Shtasel, D. L., Flannery, K. A., Mozley, L. H., . . . Mozley, P. D. (1995). Normative neuropsychological test performance: Effects of age, education, gender, and ethnicity. Applied Neuropsychology, 2, 79–88.
Scialfa, C. T. & Joffe, K. M. (1998). Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1067–1082. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211940
Sireteanu, R., & Rieth, C. (1992). Texture segregation in infants and children. Behavioral Brain Research, 49, 133–139.
Ten Brink, A. F., Visser-Meily, J. M., & Nijboer, T. C. (2018). What does it take to search organized? the cognitive correlates of search organization during cancellation after stroke. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 24, 424–36.
Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1989). Before you see it, you see its parts: Evidence for feature encoding and integration in preschool children and adults. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 334–362.
Thornton, I. M., de’Sperati, C., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2019). The influence of selection modality, display dynamics and error feedback on patterns of human foraging. Visual Cognition, 27(5/8), 626–648.
Treisman, A., Sykes, M., & Gelade, G. (1977). Attention and performance IV. Erlbaum.
Trick, L. M. & Enns, J. T. (1998). Lifespan changes in attention: The visual search task. Cognitive Development, 13, 369–386.
Vickers, D., Bovet, P., Lee, M. D., & Hughes, P. (2003). The perception of minimal structures: Performance on open and closed versions of visually presented Euclidean travelling salesperson problems. Perception, 32(7), 871–886.
Warren, M., Moore, J. M., & Vogtle, L. K. (2008). Search performance of healthy adults on cancellation tests. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(5), 588–594.
Wiener, J. M., Ehbauer, N. N., & Mallot, H. A. (2006). Path planning and optimization in the traveling salesman problem: Nearest neighbour vs. region-based strategies. In Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
Wolfe, J. M. (2010). Visual search. Current Biology, 20(8), 346–349.
Wolfe, J. M. (2013). When is it time to move to the next raspberry bush? Foraging rules in human visual search. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 10–10.
Wolfe, J. M., Cain, M. S., & Aizenman, A. M. (2019). Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(3), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5
Woods, A. J., Göksun, T., Chatterjee, A., Zelonis, S., Mehta, A., & Smith, S. E. (2013). The development of organized visual search. Acta Psychologica, 143(2), 191–199.
Zhang, J., Gong, X., Fougnie, D., & Wolfe, J. M. (2017). How humans react to changing rewards during visual foraging. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 2299–2309. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1411-9
This work was supported by the Research Fund of the University of Iceland, Grant Numbers 1032397 and 1470-147-2701 and the Icelandic Research Fund, Grant Number 152427-051.
Open practices statement
None of the data or materials for the experiments reported here is publicly available, due to Icelandic data protection laws regarding underaged participants. The experiment was not preregistered.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ólafsdóttir, I.M., Gestsdóttir, S. & Kristjánsson, Á. The development of foraging organization. Atten Percept Psychophys (2021). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02328-8
- Development, Visual search