Revisiting intersubjective action-effect binding: No evidence for social moderators
- 39 Downloads
Effect-based accounts of human action control have recently highlighted the possibility of representing one’s own actions in terms of anticipated changes in the behavior of social interaction partners. In contrast to action effects that pertain to the agent’s body or the agent’s physical environment, social action effects have been proposed to come with peculiarities inherent to their social nature. Here, we revisit the currently most prominent demonstration of such a peculiarity: the role of eye contact for action-effect learning in social contexts (Sato & Itakura, 2013, Cognition, 127, 383–390). In contrast to the previous demonstration of action-effect learning, a conceptual and a direct replication both yielded evidence for the absence of action-effect learning in the proposed design, irrespective of eye contact. Bayesian statistics supported this claim by demonstrating evidence in favor of the null hypothesis of no effect. These results suggest a limited generalizability of the original findings—for example, due to limitations that are inherent in the proposed study design or due to cultural differences.
KeywordsAction control Social actions Effect anticipations
We thank Atsushi Sato for providing us with the stimulus material of Sato and Itakura (2013), and for stimulating discussions regarding the present findings. We would like to thank Charlotte Erlinghagen and André Michael Interthal for data collection.
This research was funded by grants of the German Research Foundation to A.B. (GZ: BO4962/1-1), L.H. (HU 1847/7-1), and R.P. (PF 853, 2-1).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
- Böckler, A., van der Wel, R. P. R. D., & Welsh, T. N. (2014). Catching eyes: Effects of social and nonsocial cues on attention capture. Psychological Science, 25, 720–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516147
- Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Representing the hyphen in action-effect associations: automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action-effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1701–1712. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000022 Google Scholar
- Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., De Houwer, J., & Hommel, B. (2015). Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: An ideomotor approach. Psychological Research, 79, 630–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0590-4
- Harleß, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens [The apparatus of the will]. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50–73.Google Scholar
- Herbart, J. F. (1825). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik, und Mathematik. [Psychology as a science newly founded on experience, metaphysics, and mathematics]. Königsberg, Germany: Unzer.Google Scholar
- James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
- Nisbett, R. (2004). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently . . . and why. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar