Pavlovian reward learning elicits attentional capture by reward-associated stimuli
Feature–reward association elicits value-driven attentional capture (VDAC) regardless of the task relevance of associated features. What are the necessary conditions for feature–reward associations in VDAC? Recent studies claim that VDAC is based on Pavlovian conditioning. In this study, we manipulated the temporal relationships among feature, response, and reward in reward learning to elucidate the necessary components of VDAC. We presented reward-associated features in a variety of locations in a flanker task to form a color–reward association (training phase) and then tested VDAC in a subsequent visual search task (test phase). In Experiment 1, we showed reward-associated features in a task display requiring response selection and observed VDAC, consistent with most previous studies. In Experiment 2, features presented at a fixation display before a task display also induced VDAC. Moreover, in Experiment 3, we reduced the time interval between features and rewards so that features appeared after a task display and we obtained marginally significant VDAC. However, no VDAC was observed when features and rewards were simultaneously presented in a feedback display in Experiments 4 and 5, suggesting that a direct association between feature and reward is not sufficient for VDAC. These results are in favor of the idea that response selection does not mediate feature–reward association in VDAC. Moreover, the evidence suggests that the time interval of feature and reward is flexible with some restriction in the learning of feature–reward association. The present study supports the hypothesis that theories of Pavlovian conditioning can account for feature–reward association in VDAC.
KeywordsAttentional capture Associative learning Pavlovian conditioning Task irrelevance Reward
We would like to thank Berno Bucker for valuable feedback on earlier draft of the manuscript. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by Grants 16H01727 and 16J04500 from the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
- Bucker, B., & Theeuwes, J. (2017b). Stimulus-driven and goal-driven effects on Pavlovian associative reward learning. Visual Cognition, 26, 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2017.1399948
- Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (in press). Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y
- Ishihara, S. (1917). Tests for color-blindness. Tokyo: Hongo Harukicho.Google Scholar
- JASP Team (2017). JASP (Version 0.8.4) [Computer software] Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/
- Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (279–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rescorla, R. A. (1972). Informational variables in Pavlovian conditioning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 6, pp. l–46). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar