What or when? The impact of anticipated social action effects is driven by action-effect compatibility, not delay
- 141 Downloads
Motor actions are facilitated if they are foreseeably being imitated rather than counterimitated by social partners. Such beneficial effects of anticipated imitation have been explained in terms of compatibility between one’s own actions and their anticipated consequences. Previous demonstrations of these effects might alternatively be explained by consistently faster partner responses for imitative than for nonimitative actions, however. This study contrasts both explanations by using virtual coactors to disentangle the contributions of anticipated action-effect compatibility and anticipated action-effect delay. The data of two experiments support previous theoretical assumptions by showing that the effects of anticipated imitation are indeed driven by compatibility rather than delay.
KeywordsAction control Social interaction Ideomotor theory Action-effect compatibility Delay
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
This work was supported by the German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; DFG) to R.P. (PF 853/2-1) and W.K. (KU 1964/14-1).
Stimulus materials, raw data, and analysis scripts are available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/xket7/).
- Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rimé (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401–432). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Dignath, D., & Janczyk, M. (2017). Anticipation of delayed action-effects: Learning when an effect occurs, without knowing what this effect will be. Psychological Research. Google Scholar
- Dignath, D., Pfister, R., Eder, A. B., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2014). Representing the hyphen in action–effect associations: Automatic acquisition and bidirectional retrieval of action–effect intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1701–1712. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000022 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action control: On the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 113–136). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(5), 1015–1027.Google Scholar
- Wirth, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2016). Effect monitoring in dual task performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar