Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 79, Issue 2, pp 473–483 | Cite as

Binocularity and visual search—Revisited

  • Bochao Zou
  • Igor S. Utochkin
  • Yue Liu
  • Jeremy M. Wolfe
Article

Abstract

Binocular rivalry is a phenomenon of visual competition in which perception alternates between two monocular images. When two eye’s images only differ in luminance, observers may perceive shininess, a form of rivalry called binocular luster. Does dichoptic information guide attention in visual search? Wolfe and Franzel (Perception & Psychophysics, 44(1), 81–93, 1988) reported that rivalry could guide attention only weakly, but that luster (shininess) “popped out,” producing very shallow Reaction Time (RT) × Set Size functions. In this study, we have revisited the topic with new and improved stimuli. By using a checkerboard pattern in rivalry experiments, we found that search for rivalry can be more efficient (16 ms/item) than standard, rivalrous grating (30 ms/item). The checkerboard may reduce distracting orientation signals that masked the salience of rivalry between simple orthogonal gratings. Lustrous stimuli did not pop out when potential contrast and luminance artifacts were reduced. However, search efficiency was substantially improved when luster was added to the search target. Both rivalry and luster tasks can produce search asymmetries, as is characteristic of guiding features in search. These results suggest that interocular differences that produce rivalry or luster can guide attention, but these effects are relatively weak and can be hidden by other features like luminance and orientation in visual search tasks.

Keywords

Visual attention Visual search Binocular rivalry Binocular luster 

References

  1. Anstis, S. M. (2000). Monocular lustre from flicker. Vision Research, 40(19), 2551–2556. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00131-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, J., & Prazdny, S. (1981). Highlights and the perception of glossiness. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(4), 407–410. doi:10.3758/BF03206160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birnkrant, R. S., Wolfe, J. M., Kunar, M. A., & Sng, M. (2004). Is shininess a basic feature in visual search? doi:10.1167/2.7.551
  4. Blake, A., & Bülthoff, H. (1990). Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? Nature, 343(6254), 165–168. doi:10.1038/343165a0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, R., & Camisa, J. (1978). Is binocular vision always monocular? Science, 200(4349), 1497–1499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brainard, H. D. (1997). The Psycholysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brascamp, J. W., Klink, P. C., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2015). The “laws” of binocular rivalry: 50 years of Levelt’s propositions. Vision Research, 109, 20–37. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dick, M., Ullman, S., & Sagi, D. (1987). Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. Science. Retrieved from http://science.sciencemag.org/content/237/4813/400.short
  9. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433–458. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Egeth, H. (1972). Parallel processing of multielement displays. Cognitive Psychology, 3(4), 674–698. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90026-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Egeth, H. (1977). Attention and preattention. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 11, 277–320. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60480-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleming, R. W., Dror, R. O., & Adelson, E. H. (2003). Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. Journal of Vision, 3(5), 3. doi:10.1167/3.5.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Formankiewicz, M. A., & Mollon, J. D. (2009). The psychophysics of detecting binocular discrepancies of luminance. Vision Research, 49(15), 1929–1938. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster, D. H., & Westland, S. (1995). Orientation contrast vs orientation in line-target detection. Vision Research, 35(6), 733–738. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00178-O CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleffner, D. A., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1992). On the perception of shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(1), 18–36. doi:10.3758/BF03206757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, L., Tyler, C. W., & Schor, C. M. (1992). Failure of rivalry at low contrast: Evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process. Vision Research, 32(8), 1471–1479. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90203-U CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Logan, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 103–174. doi:10.1006/cogp.1995.1004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., Sharan, L., & Adelson, E. H. (2007). Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature, 447(7141), 206–209. doi:10.1038/nature05724 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Muryy, A. A., Fleming, R. W., & Welchman, A. E. (2014). Key characteristics of specular stereo. Journal of Vision, 14(2014), 1–26. doi:10.1167/14.14.14 Google Scholar
  20. Nagy, A. L., & Sanchez, R. R. (1990). Critical color differences determined with a visual search task. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7(7), 1209. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.7.001209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320(6059), 264–265. doi:10.1038/320264a0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Paffen, C. L. E., Hessels, R. S., & Stigchel, S. (2012). Interocular conflict attracts attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 1073. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0299-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paffen, C. L. E., Hooge, I. T. C., Benjamins, J. S., & Hogendoorn, H. (2011). A search asymmetry for interocular conflict. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(4), 1042–1053. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0100-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy-Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1/2), 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Quinlan, P. T., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics, 41(5), 455–472. doi:10.3758/BF03203039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2012). The multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis: Theory and empirical support. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(3), 540–552. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0251-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenholtz, R. (2001). Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries? Perception & Psychophysics, 63(3), 476–489. doi:10.3758/BF03194414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Royden, C. S., Wolfe, J. M., & Klempen, N. (2001). Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(3), 436–444. doi:10.3758/BF03194410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shneor, E., & Hochstein, S. (2006). Eye dominance effects in feature search. Vision Research, 46(25), 4258–4269. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Solomon, J. A., John, A., & Morgan, M. J. (2006). Monocular texture segmentation and proto-rivalry. Vision Research, 46(8/9), 1488–1492. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31(2), 156–177. doi:10.1016/S0734-189X(85)80004-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Treisman, A. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision—Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95(1), 15–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Von Helmholtz, H. (1924). Helmholtz’s treatise on physiological optics (Vol. 3). Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Helmholtz++vol+3+1924&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C22
  35. Wolfe, J. M. (1983). Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception, 12(4), 447–456. doi:10.1068/P120447 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolfe, J. M. (1998a). Visual search. Attention, 1, 13–73. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.001 Google Scholar
  37. Wolfe, J. M. (1998b). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9(1), 33–39. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: An introduction. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(3), 381–389. doi:10.3758/BF03194406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolfe, J. M. (2014). Approaches to visual search: Feature integration theory and guided search. In E. C. Anna Nobre & S. Kastner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of attention. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199675111.013.002
  40. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 419–433. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolfe, J. M., & Franzel, S. L. (1988). Binocularity and visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(1), 81–93. doi:10.3758/BF03207480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495–501. doi:10.1038/nrn1411 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhaoping, L. (2012). Gaze capture by eye-of-origin singletons: Interdependence with awareness. Journal of Vision, 12(2), 17. doi:10.1167/12.2.17 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zohary, E., & Hochstein, S. (1989). How serial is serial processing in vision? Perception, 18(2), 191–200. doi:10.1068/P180191 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Zou, J., He, S., & Zhang, P. (2016). Binocular rivalry from invisible patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(30), 8408–8413. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604816113 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Engineering Research Center of Mixed Reality and Advanced Display and School of OptoelectronicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Visual Attention LabHarvard Medical School and Brigham & Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Laboratory for Cognitive ResearchNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations