Abstract
Human peripheral vision appears vivid compared to foveal vision; the subjectively perceived level of detail does not seem to drop abruptly with eccentricity. This compelling impression contrasts with the fact that spatial resolution is substantially lower at the periphery. A similar phenomenon occurs in visual attention, in which subjects usually overestimate their perceptual capacity in the unattended periphery. We have previously shown that at identical eccentricity, low spatial attention is associated with liberal detection biases, which we argue may reflect inflated subjective perceptual qualities. Our computational model suggests that this subjective inflation occurs because under the lack of attention, the trial-by-trial variability of the internal neural response is increased, resulting in more frequent surpassing of a detection criterion. In the current work, we hypothesized that the same mechanism may be at work in peripheral vision. We investigated this possibility in psychophysical experiments in which participants performed a simultaneous detection task at the center and at the periphery. Confirming our hypothesis, we found that participants adopted a conservative criterion at the center and liberal criterion at the periphery. Furthermore, an extension of our model predicts that detection bias will be similar at the center and at the periphery if the periphery stimuli are magnified. A second experiment successfully confirmed this prediction. These results suggest that, although other factors contribute to subjective inflation of visual perception in the periphery, such as top-down filling-in of information, the decision mechanism may be relevant too.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez, G. A. (2011). Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 122–131. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003
Anstis, S. (1998). Picturing peripheral acuity. Perception, 27(7), 817–825.
Azzopardi, P., & Cowey, A. (1993). Preferential representation of the fovea in the primary visual cortex. Nature, 361(6414), 719–721. doi:10.1038/361719a0
Balas, B., Nakano, L., & Rosenholtz, R. (2009). A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. Journal of Vision, 9(12), 13.1–18. doi:10.1167/9.12.13
Banks, M. S., Sekuler, A. B., & Anderson, S. J. (1991). Peripheral spatial vision: limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 8(11), 1775–1787.
Bisley, J. W. (2011). The neural basis of visual attention. The Journal of Physiology, 589(Pt 1), 49–57. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.192666
Block, N. (2011). Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(12), 567–575. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.001
Bosman, C. A., Schoffelen, J.-M., Brunet, N., Oostenveld, R., Bastos, A. M., Womelsdorf, T., … Fries, P. (2012). Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas. Neuron, 75(5), 875–88. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.037
Boucart, M., Moroni, C., Thibaut, M., Szaffarczyk, S., & Greene, M. (2013). Scene categorization at large visual eccentricities. Vision Research, 86, 35–42. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.006
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436.
Bressler, D. W., & Silver, M. A. (2010). Spatial attention improves reliability of fMRI retinotopic mapping signals in occipital and parietal cortex. NeuroImage, 53(2), 526–533. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.063
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (p. 488). Springer.
Cafaro, J., & Rieke, F. (2010). Noise correlations improve response fidelity and stimulus encoding. Nature, 468(7326), 964–967. doi:10.1038/nature09570
Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
Carrasco, M., & Frieder, K. S. (1997). Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Research, 37(1), 63–82.
Cohen, M. A., & Dennett, D. C. (2011). Consciousness cannot be separated from function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.06.008
Curcio, C. A., Sloan, K. R., Kalina, R. E., & Hendrickson, A. E. (1990). Human photoreceptor topography. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 292(4), 497–523. doi:10.1002/cne.902920402
Daniel, P. M., & Whitteridge, D. (1961). The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. The Journal of Physiology, 159, 203–221.
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200–227. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018
DeValois, R. L., & DeValois, K. K. (1988). Spatial Vision (p. 400). Oxford University Press.
Dorfman, D. D., & Alf, E. (1969). Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6(3), 487–496.
Eckstein, M. P., Peterson, M. F., Pham, B. T., & Droll, J. A. (2009). Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention. Vision Research, 49(10), 1097–1128. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.008
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap (p. 456). CRC Press.
Gorea, A., & Sagi, D. (2000). Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(22), 12380–12384. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.12380
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1989). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (p. 521). Peninsula Pub.
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science (New York, N.Y.), 220(4598), 671–80. doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671
Kouider, S., de Gardelle, V., Sackur, J., & Dupoux, E. (2010). How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 301–307. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.006
Lamme, V. A. F. (2010). How neuroscience will change our view on consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 204–220. doi:10.1080/17588921003731586
Lau, H. (2008). A higher order Bayesian decision theory of consciousness. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 35–48.
Lau, H., & Rahnev, D. A. (2011). The paradoxical negative relationship between attention-related spontaneous neural activity and perceptual decisions. Journal of Vision, 11(11), 20–20. doi:10.1167/11.11.20
Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011). Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 365–373. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009
Levi, D. M. (2008). Crowding–an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review. Vision Research, 48(5), 635–654. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.009
Lima, B., Singer, W., Chen, N.-H., & Neuenschwander, S. (2010). Synchronization dynamics in response to plaid stimuli in monkey V1. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 20(7), 1556–73. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp218
Ma, W. J. (2010). Signal detection theory, uncertainty, and Poisson-like population codes. Vision Research, 50(22), 2308–2319. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.035
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection Theory: A User’s Guide (p. 512). Psychology Press.
McDonnell, M. D., & Abbott, D. (2009). What is stochastic resonance? Definitions, misconceptions, debates, and its relevance to biology. PLoS Computational Biology, 5(5), e1000348. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000348
Morales, J., Solovey, G., Maniscalco, B., Rahnev, D., De Lange, F. P., & Lau, H. (2014). Low Attention Impairs Optimal Incorporation of Prior Knowledge in Perceptual Decisions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Mullen, K. T. (1991). Colour vision as a post-receptoral specialization of the central visual field. Vision Research, 31(1), 119–130.
Noorlander, C., Koenderink, J. J., Den Olden, R. J., & Edens, B. W. (1983). Sensitivity to spatiotemporal colour contrast in the peripheral visual field. Vision Research, 23(1), 1–11.
O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461–488. doi:10.1037/h0084327
Oliva, A. (2005). Gist of the Scene. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of Attention (pp. 251–256). San Diego: Elsevier.
Parkes, L., Lund, J., Angelucci, A., Solomon, J. A., & Morgan, M. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4(7), 739–744. doi:10.1038/89532
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437–442.
Pelli, D. G., & Tillman, K. A. (2008). The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 11(10), 1129–1135.
Pestilli, F., Carrasco, M., Heeger, D. J., & Gardner, J. L. (2011). Attentional enhancement via selection and pooling of early sensory responses in human visual cortex. Neuron, 72(5), 832–846. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.025
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231
Rahnev, D. A., Bahdo, L., De Lange, F. P., & Lau, H. (2012a). Pre-Stimulus hemodynamic activity in dorsal attention network is negatively associated with decision confidence in visual perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(5), 1529–1536. doi:10.1152/jn.00184.2012
Rahnev, D. A., Maniscalco, B., Graves, T., Huang, E., de Lange, F. P., & Lau, H. (2011). Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception. Nature Neuroscience, 14(12), 1513–1515. doi:10.1038/nn.2948
Rahnev, D. A., Maniscalco, B., Luber, B., Lau, H., & Lisanby, S. H. (2012b). Direct injection of noise to the visual cortex decreases accuracy but increases decision confidence. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107(6), 1556–1563. doi:10.1152/jn.00985.2011
Rounis, E., Maniscalco, B., Rothwell, J. C., Passingham, R. E., & Lau, H. (2010). Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal cortex impairs metacognitive visual awareness. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 165–175. doi:10.1080/17588921003632529
Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00152-9
Simonotto, E., Riani, M., Seife, C., Roberts, M., Twitty, J., & Moss, F. (1997). Visual Perception of Stochastic Resonance. Physical Review Letters, 78(6), 1186–1189.
Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261–267.
Strasburger, H., Rentschler, I., & Jüttner, M. (2011). Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: A review. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–82. doi:10.1167/11.5.13.Contents
Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 403–409. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003
Van Pelt, S., & Fries, P. (2013). Visual stimulus eccentricity affects human gamma peak frequency. NeuroImage, 78, 439–447. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.040
Virsu, V., Näsänen, R., & Osmoviita, K. (1987). Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, 4(8), 1568. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.4.001568
Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33(2), 113–120.
Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., & Summerfield, C. (2012). Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(9), 3593–3598. doi:10.1073/pnas.1120118109
Zak, I., Katkov, M., Gorea, A., & Sagi, D. (2012). Decision criteria in dual discrimination tasks estimated using external-noise methods. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 1042–1055. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0269-0
Zhang, H., Morvan, C., & Maloney, L. T. (2010). Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(12), e1001023. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001023
Acknowledgments
This work is partially supported by a grant from the Templeton Foundation (6–40689) awarded to Hakwan Lau. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank Megan Peters and Jorge Morales for valuable comments on the manuscript, Brian Maniscalco for assistance with model fitting, and Dobromir Rahnev for task design suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solovey, G., Graney, G.G. & Lau, H. A decisional account of subjective inflation of visual perception at the periphery. Atten Percept Psychophys 77, 258–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0769-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0769-1