Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 76, Issue 6, pp 1709–1720 | Cite as

Facilitation by exogenous attention for static and dynamic gestalt groups

Article

Abstract

Attentional mechanisms allow the brain to selectively allocate its resources to stimuli of interest within the huge amount of information reaching its sensory systems. The voluntary component of attention, endogenous attention, can be allocated in a flexible manner depending on the goals and strategies of the observer. On the other hand, the reflexive component, exogenous attention, is driven by the stimulus. Here, we investigated how exogenous attention is deployed to moving stimuli that form distinct perceptual groups. We showed that exogenous attention is deployed according to a reference frame that moves along with the stimulus. Moreover, in addition to the cued stimulus, exogenous attention is deployed to all elements forming a perceptual group. These properties provide a basis for the efficient deployment of exogenous attention under ecological viewing conditions.

Keywords

Object-based attention Space-based attention Attentional capture 

References

  1. Avrahami, J. (1999). Object of attention, objects of perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1604–1612. doi:10.3758/BF03213121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, D. J. K., Bradshaw, M. F., & Rose, D. (2003). Endogenous shifts of covert attention operate within multiple coordinate frames: Evidence from a feature priming task. Perception, 32, 41–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boi, M., Vergeer, M., Ogmen, H., & Herzog, M. H. (2011). Nonretinotopic exogenous attention. Current Biology, 21, 1732–1737. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.059 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J. M., Breitmeyer, B. G., Leighty, K. A., & Denney, H. I. (2006). The path of visual attention. Acta Psychologica, 121, 199–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J. M., & Denney, H. I. (2007). Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 606–618. doi:10.3758/BF03193918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 859–880. doi:10.1080/14640749108400960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269–297. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.269 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994a). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egly, R., Rafal, R., Driver, J., & Starrveveld, Y. (1994b). Covert orienting in the split brain reveals hemispheric specialization for object-based attention. Psychological Science, 5, 380–383. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00289.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillebert, C. R., & Humphreys, G. W. (2014). Mutual interplay between perceptual organization and attention: A neuropsychological perspective. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), Oxford handbook of perceptual organization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2007). How to define an object: Evidence from the effects of action on perception and attention. Mind and Language, 22, 534–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iani, C., Nicoletti, R., Rubichi, S., & Umiltà, C. (2001). Shifting attention between objects. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 157–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. Automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Kasai, T., Moriya, H., & Hirano, S. (2011). Are objects the same as groups? ERP correlates of spatial attnetional guidance by irrelevant feature similarity. Brain Research, 1399, 49–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koffka, K. (1922). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101–124. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamy, D., & Egeth, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 52–66. doi:10.3758/BF03194557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lamy, D., & Tsal, Y. (2000). Object features, object locations, and object files: Which does selective attention activate and when? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1387–1400. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1387 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Marino, A. C., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The role of closure in defining the “objects” of object-based attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1140–1149. doi:10.3758/BF03193547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
  21. Marrara, M. T., & Moore, C. M. (2003). Object-based selection in the two-rectangles method is not an artifact of the three-sided directional cue. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1103–1109. doi:10.3758/BF03194837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104–110. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.315 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 11, 1631–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson, M. A., Gerhardstein, P. C., Mennemeier, M., & Rapcsak, S. Z. (1998). Object-centered attentional biases and object recognition contributions to scene segmentation in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Psychobiology, 26, 357–370.Google Scholar
  26. Pinna, B. (2014). What is a perceptual object? Beyond the Gestalt theory of perceptual organization. In A. Geremek, M. W. Greenlee, & S. Magnussen (Eds.), Perception beyond gestalt: Progress in vision research (pp. 48–66). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  27. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179–197. doi:10.1163/156856888X00122 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reppa, I., Schmidt, W. C., & Leek, E. C. (2012). Successes and failures in producing attentional object-based cueing effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 43–69. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0211-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ro, T., & Rafal, R. D. (1999). Components of reflexive visual orienting to moving objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 826–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., & Spekreijse, H. (1998). Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature, 395, 376–381. doi:10.1038/26475 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1–46. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00152-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 247–253. doi:10.3758/BF03196566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soto, D., & Blanco, M. J. (2004). Spatial attention and object-based attention: A comparison within a single task. Vision Research, 44, 69–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Theeuwes, J., Mathôt, S., & Grainger, J. (2013). Exogenous object-centered attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 812–818. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0459-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289–298. doi:10.1080/14640749108400971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, & Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316–320. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.123.3.316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1172–1217. doi:10.1037/a0029333 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778–780. doi:10.1126/science.3672124 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In: W. A. Ellis (Ed.), Sourcebook of gestalt psychology (pp. 71–88). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fahrettin F. Gonen
    • 1
  • Hamza Hallal
    • 1
  • Haluk Ogmen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Center for Neuro-Engineering and Cognitive ScienceUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations