Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article

Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness

  • Published: November 2008
  • Volume 70, pages 1471–1488, (2008)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness
Download PDF
  • Gordon E. Legge1,
  • Cindee Madison1,
  • Brenna N. Vaughn1,
  • Allen M. Y. Cheong1 &
  • …
  • Joseph C. Miller1 
  • 1210 Accesses

  • 81 Citations

  • 10 Altmetric

  • 2 Mentions

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Previous studies of tactile acuity on the fingertip, using passive touch, have demonstrated an age-related decline in spatial resolution for both sighted and blind subjects. We have reexamined this age dependence with two newly designed tactile-acuity charts that require active exploration of the test symbols. One chart used dot patterns similar to braille, and the other used embossed Landolt rings. Groups of blind braille readers and sighted subjects ranging from 12 to 85 years old were tested in two experiments. We replicated previous findings for sighted subjects by showing an age-related decrease in tactile acuity by nearly 1% per year. Surprisingly, the blind subjects retained high acuity into old age, showing no age-related decline. For the blind subjects, tactile acuity did not correlate with braille reading speed, the amount of daily reading, or the age at which braille was learned. We conclude that when measured with active touch, blind subjects retain high tactile acuity into old age, unlike their aging sighted peers. We propose that blind people's use of active touch in daily activities, not specifically braille reading, results in preservation of tactile acuity across the life span.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

An insight into assistive technology for the visually impaired and blind people: state-of-the-art and future trends

Article 07 January 2017

Alexy Bhowmick & Shyamanta M. Hazarika

May the force be with you: exploring force discrimination in chimpanzees using the force-feedback device

Article 20 January 2024

Masaki Tomonaga, Yoshihiro Tanaka & Motoyuki Sakai

Webcam eye tracking close to laboratory standards: Comparing a new webcam-based system and the EyeLink 1000

Article Open access 11 October 2023

Tobiasz Kaduk, Caspar Goeke, … Peter König

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (1993). Attentional control of early perceptual learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90, 5718–5722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchel, C., Price, C., Frackowiak, R. S., & Friston, K. (1998). Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. Brain, 121, 409–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, H., Snyder, A. Z., Conturo, T. E., Akbudak, E., Ollinger, J. M., & Raichle, M. E. (2002). Adaptive changes in early and late blind: A fMRI study of braille reading. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 589–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, C. J., & Sathian, K. (2001). Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 5289–5296.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. E. (1994). Active versus passive touch: Factors influencing the transmission of somatosensory signals to primary somatosensory cortex. Canadian Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology, 72, 558–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. G., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Corwell, B., Faiz, L., Dambrosia, J., et al. (1997). Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature, 389, 180–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J., & Iman, R. L. (1981). Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. American Statistician, 35, 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. C., & Johnson, K. O. (2000). The two-point threshold: Not a measure of tactile spatial resolution. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. C., & Lyle, K. B. (2001). A comparison of tactile spatial sensitivity on the palm and fingerpad. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. C., & Lyle, K. B. (2002). A correction and a comment on Craig and Lyle (2001). Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 504–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinse, H. R., Kleibel, N., Kalisch, T., Ragert, P., Wilimzig, C., & Tegenthoff, M. (2006). Tactile coactivation resets age-related decline of human tactile discrimination. Annals of Neurology, 60, 88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facchini, S., & Aglioti, S. M. (2003). Short term light deprivation increases tactile spatial acuity in humans. Neurology, 60, 1998–1999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferezou, I., Bolea, S., & Petersen, C. C. H. (2006). Visualizing the cortical representation of whisker touch: Voltage-sensitive dye imaging in freely moving mice. Neuron, 50, 617–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, F. L., III, Kassoff, A., Bresnick, G. H., & Bailey, I. (1982). New visual acuity charts for clinical research. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 94, 91–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldreich, D., & Kanics, I. M. (2003). Tactile acuity is enhanced in blindness. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3439–3445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldreich, D., & Kanics, I. M. (2006). Performance of blind and sighted humans on a tactile grating detection task. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1363–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. C., Thiagarajah, M. C., & Sathian, K. (2000). Tactile perception in blind Braille readers: A psychophysical study of acuity and hyperacuity using gratings and dot patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. P. (1966). A braille-reading machine. Science, 154, 144–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. A. (1986). Active and passive braille recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 201–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollins, M. (1989). Understanding blindness: An integrative approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, S. S., O'Shaughnessy, D. M., & Johnson, K. O. (1993). Effects of selective attention on spatial form processing in monkey primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 444–447.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. O., & Hsiao, S. S. (1992). Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 15, 227–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. O., & Phillips, J. R. (1981). Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 1177–1192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, T., Théoret, H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2002). Braille character discrimination in blindfolded human subjects. NeuroReport, 13, 571–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krupa, D. J., Wiest, M. C., Shuler, M. G., Laubach, M., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2004). Layer-specific somatosensory cortical activation during active tactile discrimination. Science, 304, 1989–1992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuusisto, S. (1999, March 21). Lives: In the dark. New York Times. Retreived February 1, 2008, from www.nytimes.com/ref/ membercenter/ nytarchive.html.

  • Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 342–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, G. E. (1978). Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties. Vision Research, 18, 69–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, G. E. (2007). Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, G. E., Madison, C. M., & Mansfield, J. S. (1999). Measuring Braille reading speed with the MNREAD test. Visual Impairment Research, 1, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M. (1981). On the tangibility of letters and braille. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M. (1985). Tactile recognition of raised characters: A parametric study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1984, November). What utility is there in distinguishing between active and passive touch? Paper presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, TX.

  • Loomis, J. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 1–41). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, C. M., & Legge, G. E. (1998). Tactile acuity in Braille and non-Braille readers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (Suppl.), 39, 175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merabet, L. B., Swisher, J. D., McMains, S. A., Halko, M. A., Amedi, A., Pascual-Leone, A., & Somers, D. C. (2007). Combined activation and deactivation of visual cortex during tactile sensory processing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 1633–1641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, S. (1997). Reading by touch. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council Committee on Vision (1980). Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement of and specification of visual acuity. Advances in Ophthalmology, 41, 103–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, C. Y., & Kederis, C. J. (1969). Perceptual factors in Braille word recognition. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, A., & Torres, F. (1993). Plasticity of the sensorimotor cortex representation of the reading finger in Braille readers. Brain, 116, 39–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polley, D. B., Steinberg, E. E., & Merzenich, M. M. (2006). Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4970–4982.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ragert, P., Schmidt, A., Altenmüller, E., & Dinse, H. R. (2004). Superior tactile performance and learning in professional pianists: Evidence for meta-plasticity in musicians. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 473–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafmani, J., Ibañez, V., Deiber, M.-P., Dold, G., & Hallett, M. (1996). Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature, 380, 526–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C. (1992). Aging and spatial acuity of touch. Journal of Gerontology, 47, P35-P40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., Alvarez-Reeves, M., Dipietro, L., Mack, G. W., & Green, B. G. (2003). Decline of tactile acuity in aging: A study of body site, blood flow, and lifetime habits of smoking and physical activity. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 20, 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., & Choo, K. K. (1996). Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 13, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., Foulke, E., & Patterson, M. Q. (1996). Tactile acuity, aging, and Braille reading in long-term blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., & Patterson, M. Q. (1995). Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: Changes over the life span. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 12, 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Boven, R. W., Hamilton, R. H., Kauffman, T., Keenan, J. P., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Tactile spatial resolution in blind Braille readers. Neurology, 54, 2230–2236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Bermudez, F., & Johnson, K. O. (2001). Differences in spatial acuity between digits. Neurology, 56, 1389–1391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Bermudez, F., & Johnson, K. O. (2004). Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with aging. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Bermudez, F., Johnson, K. O., & Hsiao, S. S. (1991). Human tactile pattern recognition: Active versus passive touch, velocity effects, and patterns of confusion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 65, 531–546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallman, J., & Winawer, J. (2004). Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron, 43, 447–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisser, V., Stilla, R., Peltier, S., Hu, X., & Sathian, K. (2005). Short-term visual deprivation alters neural processing of tactile form. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 572–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E. River Rd., 55455, Minneapolis, MN

    Gordon E. Legge, Cindee Madison, Brenna N. Vaughn, Allen M. Y. Cheong & Joseph C. Miller

Authors
  1. Gordon E. Legge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cindee Madison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brenna N. Vaughn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Allen M. Y. Cheong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joseph C. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon E. Legge.

Additional information

This work was supported by NIH Grant EY002934 to G.E.L. We thank Merv Bergman for his help in producing the dot chart, Jim Williams for help in producing the ring chart, Denis Pelli for supplying us with the image file of the Landolt C, Paul Beckmann for supplying the reticle, Steve Mansfield and Paul Schrater for helpful comments and assisting with data analysis, and Daniel Goldreich for providing data from Goldreich and Kanics (2003).

Note—Accepted by the editorial board of Editor-Elect Jeremy M. Wolfe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Legge, G.E., Madison, C., Vaughn, B.N. et al. Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 1471–1488 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1471

Download citation

  • Received: 03 February 2008

  • Accepted: 05 May 2008

  • Issue Date: November 2008

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1471

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Blind Subject
  • Sighted Subject
  • Active Touch
  • Tactile Acuity
  • Passive Touch
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

5.135.140.155

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature