Abstract
Carrasco, Ling, and Read (2004) showed that transient attention increases perceived contrast. However, Prinzmetal, Long, and Leonhardt (2008) suggest that for targets of low visibility, observers may bias their response toward the cued location, and they propose a cue-bias explanation for our previous results. Our response is threefold. First, we outline several key methodological differences between the studies that could account for the different results. We conclude that the cue-bias hypothesis is a plausible explanation for Prinzmetal et al.'s (2008) results, given the characteristics of their stimuli, but not for the studies by Carrasco and colleagues, in which the stimuli were suprathreshold (Carrasco, Ling, & Read, 2004; Fuller, Rodriguez, & Carrasco, 2008; Ling & Carrasco, 2007). Second, we conduct a study to show that the stimuli used in our previous studies are not near-threshold, but suprathreshold (Experiment 1, Phase 1). Furthermore, we found an increase in apparent contrast for a high-contrast stimulus when it was precued, but not when it was postcued, providing more evidence against a cue-bias hypothesis (Experiment 1, Phase 2). We also show that the visibility of the stimuli in Prinzmetal et al. (2008) was much lower than that of Carrasco, Ling, and Read, rendering their stimuli susceptible to their cue-bias explanation (Experiment 2). Third, we present a comprehensive summary of all the control conditions used in different labs that have ruled out a cue bias explanation of the appearance studies. We conclude that a cue-bias explanation may operate with near-threshold and low-visibility stimuli, as was the case in Prinzmetal et al. (2008), but that such an explanation has no bearing on studies with suprathreshold stimuli. Consistent with our previous studies, the present data support the claim that attention does alter the contrast appearance of suprathreshold stimuli.
References
Adelson, E. H. (2000). Lightness perception and lightness illusions. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 339–351). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alais, D., & Blake, R. (1999). Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation. ature Neuroscience, 2, 1015–1018.
Anton-Erxleben, K., Henrich, C., & Treue, S. (2007). Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns. Journal of Vision, 7(11, Art. 5), 1–9.
Bahrami, B., Carmel, D., Walsh, V., Rees, G., & Lavie, N. (2008). Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load. Journal of Vision, 8(3, Art. 13), 1–10.
Baldassi, S., & Burr, D. C. (2000). Feature-based integration of orientation signals in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1293–1300.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Breitmeyer, B. G., Kafaligonul, H., Ogmen, H., Mardon, L., Todd, S., & Ziegler, R. (2006). Meta- and paracontrast reveal differences between contour- and brightness-processing mechanisms. Vision Research, 46, 2645–2658.
Buracas, G. T., & Boynton, G. M. (2007). The effect of spatial attention on contrast response functions in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 93–97.
Cameron, E. L., Tai, J. C., & Carrasco, M. (2002). Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity. Vision Research, 42, 949–967.
Carrasco, M. (2006). Covert attention increases contrast sensitivity: Psychophysical, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging studies. In S. Martinez-Conde, S. L. Macknik, L. M. Martinez, J. M. Alonzo, & P. U. Tse (Eds.), Visual perception: Part 1. Fundamentals of vision: Low and mid-level processes in perception (pp. 33–70). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Carrasco, M. (in press). Visual attention alters appearance: Psychophysical studies of subjective experience. In T. Bayne, A. Cleeremans, & P. Wilken (Eds.), Oxford companion to consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carrasco, M., Giordano, A. M., & McElree, B. (2004). Temporal performance fields: Visual and attentional factors. Vision Research, 44, 1351–1365.
Carrasco, M., Giordano, A. M., & McElree, B. (2006). Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: Feature and conjunction searches. Vision Research, 46, 2028–2040.
Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 308–313.
Carrasco, M., Loula, F., & Ho, Y.-X. (2006). How attention enhances spatial resolution: Evidence from selective adaptation to spatial frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1004–1012.
Carrasco, M., Talgar, C. P., & Cameron, E. L. (2001). Characterizing visual performance fields: Effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size. Spatial Vision, 15, 61–75.
Carrasco, M., Talgar, C. P., & Eckstein, M. (2000). Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement. Vision Research, 40, 1203–1215.
Carrasco, M., Williams, P. E., & Yeshurun, Y. (2002). Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: Support for signal enhancement. Journal of Vision, 2, 467–479.
Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 859–880.
Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2000a). Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location. Vision Research, 40, 1269–1292.
Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z.-L. (2000b). Noise exclusion in spatial attention. Psychological Science, 11, 139–146.
Foley, J. M., & Schwarz, W. (1998). Spatial attention: Effect of position uncertainty and number of distractor patterns on the thresholdversus-contrast function for contrast discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 15, 1036–1047.
Fuller, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Exogenous attention and color perception: Performance and appearance of saturation and hue. Vision Research, 46, 4032–4047.
Fuller, S., Rodriguez, R. Z., & Carrasco, M. (2008). Apparent contrast differs across the vertical meridian: Visual and attentional factors. Journal of Vision, 8(1, Art. 16), 1–16.
Gilchrist, A. L. (1988). Lightness contrast and failures of constancy: A common explanation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 415–424.
Gobell, J., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Attention alters the appearance of spatial frequency and gap size. Psychological Science, 16, 644–651.
Gould, I. C., Wolfgang, B. J., & Smith, P. L. (2007). Spatial uncertainty explains exogenous and endogenous attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection. Journal of Vision, 7(13, Art. 4), 1–17.
Hsieh, P.-J., Caplovitz, G. P., & Tse, P. U. (2005). Illusory rebound motion and the motion continuity heuristic. Vision Research, 45, 2972–2985.
Huang, L., & Dobkins, K. R. (2005). Attentional effects on contrast discrimination in humans: Evidence for both contrast gain and response gain. Vision Research, 45, 1201–1212.
James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt. (Original work published 1890)
Lee, J., Williford, T., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2007). Spatial attention and the latency of neuronal responses in macaque area V4. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 9632–9637.
Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006a). Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions. Vision Research, 46, 1210–1220.
Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006b). When sustained attention impairs perception. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1243–1245.
Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2007). Transient covert attention does alter appearance: A reply to Schneider (2006). Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1051–1058.
Liu, T., Fuller, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Attention alters the appearance of motion coherence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1091–1096.
Liu, T., Larsson, J., & Carrasco, M. (2007). Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex. Neuron, 55, 313–323.
Liu, T., Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and fMRI response in human visual cortex. Neuron, 45, 469–477.
Lu, Z.-L., & Dosher, B. A. (1998). External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Research, 38, 1183–1198.
Lu, Z.-L., & Dosher, B. A. (2000). Spatial attention: Different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1534–1548.
Luck, S. J. (2004). Understanding awareness: One step closer. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 208–209.
Mante,V., Frazor, R. A., Bonen, V., Geisler, W. S., & Carandini, M. (2005). Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1690–1697.
Martinez-Trujillo, J., & Treue, S. (2002). Attentional modulation strength in cortical area MT depends on stimulus contrast. Neuron, 35, 365–370.
Mayfrank, L., Kimmig, H., & Fischer, B. (1987). The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided saccadic eye movements in man. In J. K. O'Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 37–45). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
McGuigan, F. J. (1997). Experimental psychology: Methods of research (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Montagna, B., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Transient covert attention and the perceived rate of flicker. Journal of Vision, 6, 955–965.
Morgan, M. J., Ward, R. M., & Castet, E. (1998). Visual search for a tilted target: Tests of spatial uncertainty models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 347–370.
Morrone, M. C., Denti, V., & Spinelli, D. (2004). Different attentional resources modulate the gain mechanisms for color and luminance contrast. Vision Research, 44, 1389–1401.
Murray, S. O., & He, S. (2006). Contrast invariance in the human lateral occipital complex depends on attention. Current Biology, 16, 606–611.
Nachmias, J. (1967). Effect of exposure duration on visual contrast sensitivity with square wave gratings. Journal of the Optical Soceity of America, 57, 421–427.
Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29, 1631–1647.
Ogmen, H., Breitmeyer, B. G., & Melvin, R. (2003). The what and where in visual masking. Vision Research, 43, 1337–1350.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Pelli, D. G., & Zhang, L. (1991). Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vision Research, 31, 1337–1350.
Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations. Vision Research, 45, 1867–1875.
Pestilli, F., Viera, G., & Carrasco, M. (2007). How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity? Journal of Vision, 7(7, Art. 9), 1–12.
Prinzmetal, W., Long, V., & Leonhardt, J. (2008). Involuntary attention and brightness contrast. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1139–1150.
Prinzmetal, W., Nwachuku, I., Bodanski, L., Blumenfield, L., & Shimizu, N. (1997). The phenomenology of attention: Part II. Contrast and brightness. Consciousness & Cognition, 6, 372–412.
Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., & Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279–290.
Reynolds, J. H., & Chelazzi, L. (2004). Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 611–647.
Reynolds, J. H., Pasternak, T., & Desimone, R. (2000). Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron, 26, 703–714.
Schneider, K. A. (2006). Does attention alter appearance? Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 800–814.
Schneider, K. A., & Komlos, M. (2008, May). Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Naples, FL.
Smith, P. (2000). Attention and luminance detection: Effects of cues, masks, and pedestals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1401–1420.
Spivey, M. J., & Spirn, M. J. (2000). Selective visual attention modulates the direct tilt aftereffect.Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1525–1533.
Talgar, C. P., & Carrasco, M. (2002). Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: Visual and attentional factors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 714–722.
Talgar, C. P., Pelli, D. G., & Carrasco, M. (2004). Covert attention enhances letter identification without affecting channel tuning. Journal of Vision, 4, 22–31.
Treue, S. (2004). Perceptual enhancement of contrast by attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 435–437.
Tsal, Y., Shalev, L., Zakay, D., & Lubow, R. E. (1994). Attention reduces perceived brightness contrast.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 865–893.
Turatto, M., Vescovi, M., & Valsecchi, M. (2007). Attention makes moving objects be perceived to move faster. Vision Research, 47, 166–178.
Williford, T., & Maunsell, J. H. (2006). Effects of spatial attention on contrast response functions in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 40–54.
Wundt, W. (1902). Outlines of psychology (C. H. Judd, Trans.). Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
Yeshurun, Y. (2004). Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution. Vision Research, 44, 1375–1387.
Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396, 72–75.
Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (2000). The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 622–627.
Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (2008). The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 104–113.
Yeshurun, Y., & Levy, L. (2003). Transient spatial attention degrades temporal resolution. Psychological Science, 14, 225–231.
Yeshurun, Y., Montagna, B., & Carrasco, M. (2008). On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task. Vision Research, 48, 80–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was funded by National Institute of Health Grant RO1 EY016200-01A2 to M.C.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carrasco, M., Fuller, S. & Ling, S. Transient attention does increase perceived contrast of suprathreshold stimuli: A reply to Prinzmetal, Long, and Leonhardt (2008). Perception & Psychophysics 70, 1151–1164 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.7.1151
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.7.1151
Keywords
- Spatial Frequency
- Vision Research
- Psychometric Function
- Location Uncertainty
- Uncued Location