Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article

Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: Effects of experimental method and stimulus type

  • Published: August 2008
  • Volume 70, pages 955–968, (2008)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: Effects of experimental method and stimulus type
Download PDF
  • Rob L. J. van Eijk1,
  • Armin Kohlrausch1,2,
  • James F. Juola1,3 &
  • …
  • Steven van de Par2 
  • 2883 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

When an audio—visual event is perceived in the natural environment, a physical delay will always occur between the arrival of the leading visual component and that of the trailing auditory component. This natural timing relationship suggests that the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) should occur at an auditory delay greater than or equal to 0 msec. A review of the literature suggests that PSS estimates derived from a temporal order judgment (TOJ) task differ from those derived from a synchrony judgment (SJ) task, with (unnatural) auditory-leading PSS values reported mainly for the TOJ task. We report data from two stimulus types that differed in terms of complexity— namely, (1) a flash and a click and (2) a bouncing ball and an impact sound. The same participants judged the temporal order and synchrony of both stimulus types, using three experimental methods: (1) a TOJ task with two response categories (“audio first” or “video first”), (2) an SJ task with two response categories (“synchronous” or “asynchronous”; SJ2), and (3) an SJ task with three response categories (“audio first,” “synchronous,” or “video first”; SJ3). Both stimulus types produced correlated PSS estimates with the SJ tasks, but the estimates from the TOJ procedure were uncorrelated with those obtained from the SJ tasks. These results suggest that the SJ task should be preferred over the TOJ task when the primary interest is in perceived audio—visual synchrony.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Audiovisual temporal recalibration occurs independently at two different time scales

Article Open access 12 October 2015

Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement

Article 26 February 2018

Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony follows the physical—not the perceived—temporal order

Article 02 July 2018
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Allan, L. G. (1975). The relationship between judgments of successiveness and judgments of order. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, L. G., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1974). Successiveness discrimination: Two models. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, R., Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2006). Perceptual synchrony of audiovisual streams for natural and artificial motion sequences. Journal of Vision, 6, 260–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aschersleben, G. (1999). On the asymmetry of the temporal contiguity window: Commentary on Lewkowicz. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 421–424). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aschersleben, G., & Müsseler, J. (1999). Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1709–1720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bald, L., Berrien, F. K., Price, J. B., & Sprague, R. O. (1942). Errors in perceiving the temporal order of auditory and visual stimuli. Journal of Applied Psychology, 26, 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinnerstein, A. J., & Zlotogura, P. (1968). Intermodal perception of temporal order and motor skills: Effects of age. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 26, 987–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. F., & Spitz, L. (1980). The detection of auditory visual desynchrony. Perception, 9, 719–721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enoki, K., Washikita, K., & Yamada, M. (2006). Detection threshold of asynchrony between auditory and visual stimuli for various motion patterns of a ball. In Proceedings of the 9th Western Pacific Acoustics Conference (WESPAC IX) [CD-ROM]. Seoul: Acoustical Society of Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlebacher, A., & Sekuler, R. (1971). Response frequency equalization: A bias model for psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, S. (1875). Experimentelle Untersuchung der einfachsten psychischen Processe: III. Der persönlichen Gleichung zweiter Theil. Archiv für die gesammte Physiologie des Menschen & der Thiere, 11, 403–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki, W., Shimojo, S., Kashino, M., & Nishida, S. (2004). Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 773–778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, A. J. (1895). On the least observable interval between stimuli addressed to disparate senses and to different organs of the same sense. American Journal of Psychology, 6, 564–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, I. J., & Fraisse, P. (1964). Simultanéité et succession de stimuli hétérogènes. L'Année Psychologique, 64, 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, I. J., & Sherrick, C. E., Jr. (1961). Perceived order in different sense modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 423–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollier, M. P., & Rimell, A. N. (1998, September). An experimental investigation into multi-modal synchronization sensitivity for perceptual model development. Paper presented at the 105th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, San Francisco, CA.

  • Jaśkowski, P. (1993). Selective attention and temporal-order judgment. Perception, 22, 681–689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaśkowski, P., Jaroszyk, F., & Hojan-Jezierska, D. (1990). Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities. Psychological Research, 52, 35–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juola, J. F., van Eijk, R. L. J., Kohlrausch, A., & van de Par, S. (2007, July). Synchrony detection and temporal order judgments for bimodal stimuli. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Experimental Psychology (U.K.) & Psychonomic (U.S.A.) Societies, Edinburgh, Scotland.

  • Keetels, M., & Vroomen, J. (2005). The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio—visual temporal order judgments. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 635–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. J., & Palmer, A. R. (1985). Integration of visual and auditory information in bimodal neurones in the guinea-pig superior colliculus. Experimental Brain Research, 60, 492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz, D. J. (1996). Perception of auditory—visual temporal synchrony in human infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1094–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludbrook, J. (1998). Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, 25, 1032–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, M., & Summerfield, Q. (1985). Intermodal timing relations and audio—visual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 678–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrani, L., Shekerdjiiski, S., & Yakimoff, N. (1986). Mechanisms and asymmetries in visual perception of simultaneity and temporal order. Biological Cybernetics, 54, 159–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myung, I. J. (2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O., & Niepel, M. (2004). Timing of “perception” and perception of “time.” In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition (pp. 245–269). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A., & Haugen, R. (1967). The frequency principle for comparative judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöppel, E. (1988). Mindworks: Time and conscious experience [Trans. of Grenzen des Bewuβtseins by T. Artin]. Boston: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihs, S. (1995). The influence of audio on perceived picture quality and subjective audio—video delay tolerance. In R. Hamberg & H. de Ridder (Eds.), Advanced methods for the evaluation of television picture quality: Proceedings of the MOSAIC Workshop (pp. 133–137). Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutschmann, J., & Link, R. (1964). Perception of temporal order of stimuli differing in sense mode and simple reaction time. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 18, 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. A., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Components of visual prior entry. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 333–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sekuler, R., & Erlebacher, A. (1971). The invalidity of “invalid results from the method of constant stimuli”: A common artifact in the methods of psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 309–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, D. I., Gray, K., Spry, E., & Spence, C. (2005). Spatial modulation of tactile temporal-order judgments. Perception, 34, 1251–1262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, D. I., Spry, E., & Spence, C. (2002). Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 153–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smeele, P. M. T. (1994). Perceiving speech: Integrating auditory and visual speech. Unpublished PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, The Netherlands. Retrieved April 11, 2007, from repository.tudelft.nl/ file/257315/201176.

  • Smith, W. F. (1933). The relative quickness of visual and auditory perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C., Baddeley, R., Zampini, M., James, R., & Shore, D. I. (2003). Multisensory temporal order judgments: When two locations are better than one. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 799–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stekelenburg, J. J., & Vroomen, J. (2007). Neural correlates of multisensory integration of ecologically valid audiovisual events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1964–1973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach, L. B., & Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 539–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S., & Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 629–685). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J. V., Hunkin, N. M., Porrill, J., Wood, R., Keeler, V., Beanland, M., et al. (2001). When is now? Perception of simultaneity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 268, 31–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teatini, G., Farnè, M., Verzella, F., & Berruecos, P., Jr. (1976). Perception of temporal order: Visual and auditory stimuli. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 3, 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tune, G. S. (1964). Response preferences: A review of some relevant literature. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 286–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Par, S., Kohlrausch, A., & Juola, J. F. (2002). Some methodological aspects for measuring asynchrony detection in audio—visual stimuli. In A. Calvo-Manzano, A. Perez-Lopez, & J. S. Santiago (Eds.), Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum 2002 [CD-ROM]. Porto, Portugal: Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Engenharia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eijk, R. L. J., Kohlrausch, A., van de Par, S., & Juola, J. F. (2006, June). The influence of psychophysical procedure and stimulus type on estimates of human performance in detecting audio—visual asynchrony. Paper presented at the 7th International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF), University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia, 45, 598–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vatakis, A., Navarra, J., Soto-Faraco, S., & Spence, C. (2008). Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: Temporal order versus simultaneity judgments. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 521–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatakis, A., & Spence, C. (2006a). Audiovisual synchrony perception for music, speech, and object actions. Brain Research, 1111, 134–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vatakis, A., & Spence, C. (2006b). Audiovisual synchrony perception for speech and music assessed using a temporal order judgment task. Neuroscience Letters, 393, 40–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vatakis, A., & Spence, C. (2007). Crossmodal binding: Evaluating the “unity assumption” using audiovisual speech stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 744–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroomen, J., Keetels, M., de Gelder, B., & Bertelson, P. (2004). Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio— visual asynchrony. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 32–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, G. M. (1899). On nearly simultaneous clicks and flashes. American Journal of Psychology, 10, 280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampini, M., Brown, T., Shore, D. I., Maravita, A., Röder, B., & Spence, C. (2005). Audiotactile temporal order judgments. Acta Psychologica, 118, 277–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zampini, M., Guest, S., Shore, D. I., & Spence, C. (2005). Audio— visual simultaneity judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampini, M., Shore, D. I., & Spence, C. (2003a). Audiovisual temporal order judgments. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zampini, M., Shore, D. I., & Spence, C. (2003b). Multisensory temporal order judgments: The role of hemispheric redundancy. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50, 165–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, IPO 1.25, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Rob L. J. van Eijk, Armin Kohlrausch & James F. Juola

  2. Philips Research Laboratories, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Armin Kohlrausch & Steven van de Par

  3. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas

    James F. Juola

Authors
  1. Rob L. J. van Eijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Armin Kohlrausch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James F. Juola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Steven van de Par
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob L. J. van Eijk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Eijk, R.L.J., Kohlrausch, A., Juola, J.F. et al. Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: Effects of experimental method and stimulus type. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 955–968 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.6.955

Download citation

  • Received: 07 May 2007

  • Accepted: 26 February 2008

  • Issue Date: August 2008

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.6.955

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Stimulus Type
  • Temporal Order Judgment
  • Visual Speech
  • Response Proportion
  • Auditory Component
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

65.109.116.201

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature