Abstract
Our trunks influence where we perform actions in space. Thus, trunk direction may define a region of space that is accorded special treatment by the attention system. We investigated conditions under which a trunk orientation bias for attention might be relevant for healthy adults. Three experiments compared visual detection performance for participants standing and walking on a treadmill. Together, the experiments disambiguate the relative contributions of motor activity, motor load, and cognitive load on trunk orientation biases. In Experiment 1, trunk orientation biases (i.e., faster target detection for targets in front of the body midline) were observed in both forward and sideways walking conditions, but not in standing conditions. In Experiment 2, we ruled out the notion that the trunk orientation bias arose from increased motor activity; in fact, the bias was greatest when participants walked at an unusually slow pace. In Experiment 3, we directly compared motor load with cognitive load in a dual-task paradigm; cognitive load influenced overall performance speed, but only motor load produced trunk orientation bias. These results suggest that a trunk orientation bias emerges during walking and motor load conditions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biguer, B., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1985). The role of position of gaze in movement accuracy. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 407–424). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bradshaw, J. L., & Mattingley, J. B. (1995). Clinical neuropsychology. New York: Academic Press.
Brain, W. R. (1941). Visual disorientation with special reference to lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Brain, 64, 224–272.
Bridger, R. S. (1995). Introduction to ergonomics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80–90.
Diedrich, F. J., & Warren, W. H. (1995). Why change gaits? The dynamics of the walk-run transition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 181–202.
Grubb, J. D., & Reed, C. L. (2002). Trunk orientation induces neglectlike lateral biases in covert attention. Psychological Science, 13, 553–556.
Hasselbach-Heitzeg, M. M., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2002). Egocentric body-centered coordinates modulate visuomotor performance. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1822–1833.
James, W. (1948). Psychology. Cleveland: Fine Editions Press.
Jeannerod, M., & Biguer, B. (1987). The directional coding of reaching movements: A visuomotor conception of spatial neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect (pp. 87–113). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Jimenez, L., & Vazquez, G. A. (2005). Sequence learning under dualtask conditions: Alternatives to a resource-based account. Psychological Research, 69, 352–368.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). Orlando: Academic Press.
Karnath, H.-O. (1994). Subjective body orientation in neglect and the interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation. Brain, 117, 1001–1012.
Karnath, H.-O. (1997). Neural encoding of space in egocentric coordinates? Evidence for and limits of a hypothesis derived from patients with parietal lesions and neglect. In P. Thier & H.-O. Karnath (Eds.), Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space (pp. 497–520). Berlin: Springer.
Karnath, H.-O., Christ, K., & Hartje, W. (1993). Decrease of contralateral neglect by neck muscle vibration and spatial orientation of trunk midline. Brain, 116, 383–396.
Karnath, H.-O., Schenkel, P., & Fischer, B. (1991). Trunk orientation as the determining factor in the “contralateral” deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the anchor of the internal representation of the body in space. Brain, 114, 1997–2014.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center (2002). NASA Glenn safety manual: CH-30 ergonomics. Available at osat-ext.grc.nasa.gov/gso/manual/chapter_30.pdf.
Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Administration (2002). Health and safety guidelines for video display terminals in the workplace (OR-OSHA Publication No. 440–1863 [12/02]). Salem, OR: Author.
Pizzamiglio, L., Frasca, R., Guariglia, C., Incoccia, C., & Antonucci, G. (1990). Effect of optokinetic stimulation in patients with visual neglect. Cortex, 26, 535–540.
Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 123–164.
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.
Rorden, C., Karnath, H.-O., & Driver, J. (2001). Do neck-proprioceptive and caloric-vestibular stimulation influence covert visual attention in normals, as they influence visual neglect? Neuropsychologia, 39, 364–375.
Rubens, A. B. (1985). Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect. Neurology, 35, 1019–1024.
Vallar, G., Guariglia, C., & Rusconi, L. (1997). Modulation of the neglect syndrome by sensory stimulation. In P. Thier & H.-O. Karnath (Eds.), Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space (pp. 556–578). Berlin: Springer.
Ventre, J., Flandrin, J. M., & Jeannerod, M. (1984). In search for the egocentric reference: A neurophysiological hypothesis. Neuropsychologia, 22, 797–806.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NINDS F31 NS42873-02 and a University of Denver Partners-in-Scholarship grant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grubb, J.D., Reed, C.L., Bate, S. et al. Walking reveals trunk orientation bias for visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 688–696 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.4.688
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.4.688