Abstract
Recent studies show that perceptual boundaries between phonetic categories are changeable with training (Norris, McQueen, & Cutler, 2003). For example, Kraljic and Samuel (2005) exposed listeners in a lexical decision task to ambiguous /s-∫/ sounds in either s-word contexts (e.g., lega c y) or ∫-word contexts (e.g., para ch ute). In a subsequent /s/-/∫/ categorization test, listeners in the /s/ condition categorized more tokens as /s/ than did those in the /∫/ condition. The effect—termed perceptual learning in speech—is assumed to reflect a change in phonetic category representation. However, the result could be due to a decision bias resulting from the training task. In Experiment 1, we replicated the basic Kraljic and Samuel (2005) experiment and added an AXB discrimination test. In Experiment 2, we used a task that is less likely to induce a decision bias. Results of both experiments and signal detection analyses point to a true change in phonetic representation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 379–384.
Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (2003). Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect. Psychological Science, 14, 592–597.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2006). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.13) [Computer program]. Available from www.praat.org/.
Braida, L. D., & Durlach, N. I. (1972). Intensity perception: II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 483–502.
Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreignaccented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3647–3658.
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1969). Intensity perception: I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 372–383.
Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224–238.
Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1950–1953.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Krieger.
Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? Cognitive Psychology, 51, 141–178.
Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 262–268.
Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory & Language, 56, 1–15.
Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
Ladefoged, P. (1989). A note on “Information conveyed by vowels.” University of California Working Papers in Phonetics, 72, 161–163.
Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 98–104.
Leach, L., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 306–353.
Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358–368.
Luce, R. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (pp. 103–189). New York: Wiley.
Massaro, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398–421.
McGarr, N. S. (1983). The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 26, 451–458.
McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30, 1113–1126.
McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (2006). The dynamic nature of speech perception. Language & Speech, 49, 101–112.
Newman, R. S., Clouse, S. A., & Burnham, J. L. (2001). The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1181–1196.
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204–238.
Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 355–376.
Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5, 42–46.
Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8, 434–447.
Pitt, M. A. (1995). The locus of the lexical shift in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1037–1052.
Pollack, I., & Pisoni, D. (1971). On the comparison between identification and discrimination tests in speech perception. Psychonomic Science, 24, 299–300.
Sawusch, J. R., Nusbaum, H. C., & Schwab, E. C. (1980). Contextual effects in vowel perception II: Evidence for two processing mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 421–434.
van Linden, S., & Vroomen, J. (2007). Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1483–1494.
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 374–408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was funded by a National Institutes of Health National Research Service Award to C.M.C.-D.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clarke-Davidson, C.M., Luce, P.A. & Sawusch, J.R. Does perceptual learning in speech reflect changes in phonetic category representation or decision bias?. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 604–618 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.4.604
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.4.604