Abstract
The temporal integration of continuous sensory information into a temporally extended percept becomes evident in spontaneous reversals of ambiguous apparent motion. To study the temporal relation of spontaneous percept reversals and temporal stimulus properties, we systematically varied presentation frequency in an ambiguous-apparent-motion paradigm. Moreover, we triggered percept reversals in a manner that was not consciously perceived by manipulating the duration of single frames. We found that the reversal rate depended on the stimulus frequency (with higher frequencies resulting in faster percept reversals) and that we could externally trigger perceptual reversals. Our findings support the idea that spontaneous reversals of ambiguous apparent motion are influenced by bottom-up effects at early processing levels. The paradigm allows for specific contrasts of spontaneous and externally triggered (but otherwise identical) perceptual reversals and, by this means, for further study of the underlying mechanisms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Babich, S., & Standing, L. (1981). Satiation effects with reversible figures. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 52, 203–210.
Beer, J. (1989). Learning effects while passively viewing the Necker cube. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 69, 1391–1394.
Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13–21.
Blake, R., Sobel, K. V., & Gilroy, L. A. (2003). Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron, 39, 869–878.
Borsellino, A., Carlini, F., Riani, M., Tuccio, M. T., De Marco, A., Penengo, P., & Trabucco, A. (1982). Effects of visual angle on perspective reversal for ambiguous patterns. Pereption, 11, 263–273.
Brouwer, G. J., & van Ee, R. (2006). Endogenous influences on perceptual bistability depend on exogenous stimulus characteristics. Vision Research, 46, 3393–3402.
Bruner, J. S., Busiek, R. D., & Minturn, A. L. (1952). Assimilation in the immediate reproduction of visually perceived figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 151–155.
Bugelski, B. R., & Alampay, D. A. (1961). The role of frequency in developing perceptual sets. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15, 205–211.
Cavanagh, P. (1992). Attention-based motion perception. Science, 257, 1563–1565.
Culham, J. C., Verstraten, F. A. J., Ashida, H., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Independent aftereffects of attention and motion. Neuron, 28, 607–615.
Gomez, C., Argandona, E. D., Solier, R. G., Angulo, J. C., & Vazquez, M. (1995). Timing and competition in networks representing ambiguous figures. Brain & Cognition, 29, 103–114.
Hochberg, J., & Peterson, M. A. (1987). Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: Perceptually coupled responses to moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 370–380.
Hol, K., Koene, A., & van Ee, R. (2003). Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Vision, 3, 486–498.
Kanai, R., Moradi, F., Shimojo, S., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2005). Perceptual alternation induced by visual transients. Perception, 34, 803–822.
Kleinschmidt, A., Büchel, C., Zeki, S., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1998). Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 265, 2427–2433.
Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254–264.
Leopold, D. A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 605–609.
Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245, 761–763.
Long, G. M., & Olszweski, A. D. (1999). To reverse or not to reverse: When is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous? American Journal of Psychology, 112, 41–71.
Long, G. M., & Toppino, T. C. (2004). Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 748–768.
Long, G. M., Toppino, T. C., & Kostenbauder, J. F. (1983). As the cube turns: Evidence for two processes in the perception of a dynamic reversible figure. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 29–38.
Long, G. M., Toppino, T. C., & Mondin, G. W. (1992). Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 609–616.
Lumer, E. D., Friston, K. J., & Rees, G. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science, 280, 1930–1934.
Lumer, E. D., & Rees, G. (1999). Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 1669–1673.
Lynn, R. (1961). Reversible perspective as a function of stimulus-intensity. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 131–133.
Orbach, J., Ehrlich, D., & Heath, H. A. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker cube: I. An examination of the concept of “satiation of orientation.” Perceptual & Motor Skills, 17, 439–458.
Orbach, J., Zucker, E., & Olson, R. (1966). Reversibility of the Necker cube: VII. Reversal rate as a function of figure-on and figureoff durations. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 22, 615–618.
Petersik, J. T., Shepard, A., & Malsch, R. (1984). A three-dimensional motion aftereffect produced by prolonged adaptation to a rotation simulation. Perception, 13, 489–497.
Peterson, M. A., & Hochberg, J. (1983). Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 183–193.
Pöppel, E. (2004). Lost in time: A historical frame, elementary processing units and the 3-second window. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 64, 295–301.
Reisberg, D. (1983). General mental resources and perceptual judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 966–979.
Reisberg, D., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1984). Diverting subjects’ concentration slows figural reversals. Perception, 13, 461–468.
Rock, I., Hall, S., & Davis, J. (1994). Why do ambiguous figures reverse? Acta Psychologica, 87, 33–57.
Rock, I., & Mitchener, K. (1992). Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects. Perception, 21, 39–45.
Slotnick, S. D., & Yantis, S. (2005). Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 97–108.
Sterzer, P., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2007). A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 323–328.
Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Preibisch, C., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2002). Neural correlates of spontaneous direction reversals in ambiguous apparent visual motion. NeuroImage, 15, 908–916.
Toppino, T. C. (2003). Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1285–1295.
Toppino, T. C., & Long, G. M. (1987). Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don’t change that channel. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 37–48.
van Dam, L. C. J., & van Ee, R. (2006). The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 787–799.
Verstraten, F. A. J., & Ashida, H. (2005). Attention-based motion perception and motion adaptation: What does attention contribute? Vision Research, 45, 1313–1319.
Verstraten, F. A. J., Cavanagh, P., & Labianca, A. T. (2000). Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Research, 40, 3651–3664.
Verstraten, F. A. J., Hooge, I. T., Culham, J., & Van Wezel, R. J. (2001). Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking. Vision Research, 41, 3505–3511.
Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie & Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 61, 161–265.
Wilms, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Specht, K., Amunts, K., Shah, N. J., Malikovic, A., & Fink, G. R. (2005). Human V5/MT1: Comparison of functional and cytoarchitectonic data. Anatomy & Embryology, 210, 485–495.
Wohlschläger, A. (2000). Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research, 40, 925–930.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work was supported by the Gerhard und Irmgard Schulz Fond.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ilg, R., Burazanis, S., Wohlschläger, A.M. et al. Stimulus frequency influences spontaneous perceptual reversals in ambiguous apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 437–442 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.437
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.437