Abstract
When a target appears unpredictably in the same rather than a different location relative to a preceding onset cue, reaction times (RTs) of participants tasked with responding to the target are slowed. This pattern of results, referred to as inhibition of return (IOR), is believed to reflect the operation of a mechanism that prevents perseverative search of nontarget locations. On the grounds that an evolved mechanism might be sensitive to social stimuli, Taylor and Therrien (2005) examined IOR for localization responses under conditions in which cues and targets could be intact face configurations or nonface configurations; contrary to their predictions, there was no influence of cue or target configuration on the magnitude of IOR, indicating that the mere occurrence of taskirrelevant face and nonface stimuli does not alter IOR. In the present study, we further examined this issue in a task that required a face/nonface target discrimination. When target configuration was thereby made task relevant, we found that IOR differed for face and nonface targets in terms of magnitude (when a single cue-target stimulus onset asynchrony was employed) and time course. We suggest that the RT delay associated with IOR may enable additional processing time and/or response selection when a task-relevant face is presented at the cued location.
Article PDF
References
Bentin, S., & McCarthy, G. (1994). The effects of immediate stimulus repetition on reaction time and event-related potentials in tasks of different complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 130–149.
Bentin, S., & Moscovitch, M. (1988). The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 148–160.
Berger, A., Dori, H., & Henik, A. (1999). Peripheral non-informative cues do induce early facilitation of target detection. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 119–137.
Berlucchi, G. (2006). Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better name. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1065–1074.
Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (1999). The effect of inhibition of return on lexical access. Psychological Science, 10, 41–46.
Cohen, J. [D.], MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
Danziger, S., & Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1024–1037.
Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 355–379.
Gallup, G. G., Nash, R. F., & Ellison, A. L. (1971). Tonic immobility as a reaction to predation: Artificial eyes as a fear stimulus for chickens. Psychonomic Science, 23, 79–80.
Handy, T. C., Jha, A. P., & Mangun, G. R. (1999). Evidence for an attention component in inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 10, 157–161.
Hunt, A., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1068–1074.
Ivanoff, J. G. S. (2004). On the information processing dynamics of inhibition of return. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64 (9B), 464.
Ivanoff, J. [G. S.], & Klein, R. M. (2001). The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 307–314.
Ivanoff, J. [G. S.], & Klein, R. M. (2004). Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 542–550.
Ivanoff, J. [G. S.], & Taylor, T. L. (2006). Inhibition of return promotes stop signal inhibition by delaying responses. Visual Cognition, 13, 503–512.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.
Kingstone, A., & Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1046–1054.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430–431.
Klein, R. M., & Dick, B. (2002). Temporal dynamics of reflexive attention shifts: A dual-stream rapid serial visual presentation exploration. Psychological Science, 13, 176–179.
Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346–352.
Klein, R. M., & Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). San Diego: Academic Press.
Lupiáñez, J., Milán, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241–1254.
Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., & Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 753–773.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 315–330.
Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211–228.
Pratt, J., & Fischer, M. H. (2002). Examining the role of the fixation cue in inhibition of return. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 294–301.
Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., & Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 964–971.
Pratt, J., Spalek, T. M., & Bradshaw, F. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 730–746.
Prime, D. J., & Ward, L. M. (2004). Inhibition of return from stimulus to response. Psychological Science, 15, 272–276.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., & Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 673–685.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., & Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 367–378.
Samuel, A. G., & Kat, D. (2003). Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 897–906.
Snyder, J. J., Schmidt, W., & Kingstone, A. (2001). Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1420–1432.
Sumner, P. (2006). Inhibition versus attentional momentum in cortical and collicular mechanisms of IOR. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1035–1048.
Taylor, T. L. (2006). Inhibition of return for expected and unexpected targets. Acta Psychologica, 124, 257–273.
Taylor, T. L., & Donnelly, M. P. W. (2002). Inhibition of return for target discriminations: The effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 292–317.
Taylor, T. L., & Ivanoff, J. (2003). The interplay of stop signal inhibition and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1349–1371.
Taylor, T. L., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Inhibition of return and repetition priming effects for localization and discrimination tasks. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 75–89.
Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 625–643.
Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1639–1656.
Taylor, T. L., & Therrien, M. E. (2005). Inhibition of return for faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1414–1422.
Theeuwes, J., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2006). Faces capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 13, 657–665.
Tipper, C., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Is inhibition of return a reflexive effect? Cognition, 97, B55-B62.
Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrib, O., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 257–279.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by funding from NSERC in the form of a CGS-D award to M.E.T. and a Discovery grant to T.L.T.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, T.L., Therrien, M.E. Inhibition of return for the discrimination of faces. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 279–290 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.2.279
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.2.279