Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article
Gender differences in spatial perception of body tilt
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Published: February 2008

Gender differences in spatial perception of body tilt

  • Yoko K. Naylor1 &
  • Michael K. McBeath1 

Perception & Psychophysics volume 70, pages 199–207 (2008)Cite this article

  • 1033 Accesses

  • 14 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The tendency for observers to overestimate slant is not simply a visual illusion but can also occur with another sense, such as proprioception, as in the case of overestimation of self-body tilt. In the present study, distortion in the perception of body tilt was examined as a function of gender and multisensory spatial information. We used a full-body-tilt apparatus to test when participants experienced being tilted by 45°, with visual and auditory cues present or absent. Body tilt was overestimated in all conditions, with the largest bias occurring when there were no visual or auditory cues. Both visual and auditory information independently improved performance. We also found a gender difference, with women exhibiting more bias in the absence of auditory information and more improvement when auditory information was added. The findings support the view that perception of body tilt is multisensory and that women more strongly utilize auditory information in such multisensory spatial judgments.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Afonso, S. (2001). Landscape and environment in architecture and urban design. In F. O. R. Pereira, R. Ruther, R. V. G. Souza, S. Afonso, & J. A. B. de Cunha Neto (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (pp. 501-506). Florianópolis, Brazil: Organizing Committee of the 18th International PLEA conference. Available at www.arq.ufsc.br/~soniaa/sonia/paperpleacomimagens.pdf.

  • Aksamit, G., & Husak, W. (1983). Feedback influences on the skill of putting. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 56, 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. G., & Haccoun, D. M. (1976). Sex differences in emotionality: A multidimensional approach. Human Relations, 29, 711–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Automobile Association (1996). California/Nevada tour book. Heathrow, FL: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, E. J., Hancock, P. A., & Chrysler, S. T. (1997). The perception of spatial layout in real and virtual worlds. Ergonomics, 40, 69–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashmead, D. H., Davis, D. L., & Northington, A. (1995). Contribution of listeners’ approaching motion to auditory distance perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 239–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertamini, M., Yang, T. L., & Proffitt, D. R. (1998). Relative size perception at a distance is best at eye level. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 673–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blier, M. J., & Blier-Wilson, L. A. (1989). Gender differences in selfrated emotional expressiveness. Sex Roles, 21, 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bringoux, L., Nougier, V., Barraud, P. A., Marin, L., & Raphel, C. (2003). Contribution of somesthetic information to the perception of body orientation in the pitch dimension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 909–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronkhorst, A. W., & Houtgast, T. (1999). Auditory distance perception in rooms. Nature, 397, 517–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, A. (1999). The interaction of otolith and proprioceptive information in the perception of verticality: The effects of labyrinthine and CNS disease. In B. Cohen & B. J. M. Hess (Eds.), Otolith function in spatial orientation and movement (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 871, pp. 324–333). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brungart, D. S., & Rabinowitz, W. M. (1999). Auditory localization of nearby sources: Head-related transfer functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1465–1479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, L. (2005). His brain, her brain. Scientific American, 292, 40–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., & Brabeck, M. M. (1989). Exceptions to the male advantage on a spatial task: Family handedness and college major as factors identifying women who excel. Neuropsychologia, 27, 689–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Pozza, R., Kleinmann, A., Kozlik-Feldmann, R., & Netz, H. (2006). Tilt table testing in childhood: improved sensitivity by noninvasive haemodynamic monitoring devices? Acta Cardiologica, 61, 615–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day, B. L., & Cole, J. (2002). Vestibular-evoked postural responses in the absence of somatosensory information. Brain, 125, 2081–2088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Della Casa, V., Höfer, I., Weiner, I., & Feldon, J. (1998). The effects of smoking on acoustic prepulse inhibition in healthy men and women. Psychopharmacology, 137, 362–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higashiyama, A., & Koga, K. (1998). Apparent body tilt and postural aftereffect. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isableu, B., & Vuillerme, N. (2006). Differential integration of kinaesthetic signals to postural control. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 763–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, Y., & Gresty, M. A. (1997). Subjective postural orientation and visual vertical during slow pitch tilt for the seated human subject. Aviation, Space, & Environmental Medicine, 68, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeka, J. J., Easton, R. D., Bentzen, B. L., & Lackner, J. R. (1996). Haptic cues for orientation and postural control in sighted and blind individuals. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 409–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, J. G. (1998). The misperception of body tilt: Support for an ecologically-guided multisensory representation of space. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.

  • Jewell, J. G., & McBeath, M. K. (1998). A mapping of the distortion in the representation of proprioceptive space. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 39, S1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. J., Schnupp, J. W. H., & Doubell, T. P. (2001). The shape of ears to come: dynamic coding of auditory space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 261–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella-Shaw, J. M., Shaw, B., & Turvey, M. T. (1992). Perceiving “walk-on-able” slopes. Ecological Psychology, 4, 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C. A. (1996). Strategies for indoor way finding: The role of orientation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C. A., & Morrin, K. A. (1999). Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computer-simulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles, 40, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (1976). Cerebral lateralization and spatial ability. Behavior Genetics, 6, 171–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. D., Mershon, D. H., & Cox, P. H. (1992). Spectral content as a cue to perceived auditory distance. Perception, 21, 405–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Philbeck, J. W., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 966–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manchester, D., Woollacott, M., Zederbauer-Hylton, N., & Marin, O. (1989). Visual, vestibular and somatosensory contributions to balance control in the older adult. Journal of Gerontology, 44, M118-M127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, S. L., Henselman, L. W., & Zheng, X. Y. (1999). Sex differences in auditory sensitivity of chinchillas before and after exposure to impulse noise. Ear & Hearing, 20, 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeuwsen, H. J. (1991). Variables affecting perceptual boundaries in bipedal stair climbing. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 72, 539–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mershon, D. H., Ballenger, W. L., Little, A. D., McMurtry, P. L., & Buchanan, J. L. (1989). Effects of room reflectance and background noise on perceived auditory distance. Perception, 18, 403–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. K., & Santoni, V. (1986). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Strategic and experiential correlates. Acta Psychologica, 62, 225–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, H. (1996). Somatic graviception. Biological Psychology, 42, 53–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ooi, T. L., Wu, B., & He, Z. J. (2001). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon, Nature, 414, 197–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parameswaran, G. (1995). Gender difference in horizontality performance before and after training. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 105–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perrone, J. A. (1982). Visual slant underestimation: A general model. Perception, 11, 641–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., & Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D. R., Creem, S. H., & Zosh, W. D. (2001). Seeing mountains in molehills: Geographical-slant perception. Psychological Science, 12, 418–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ries, M., Kim, H. J., Zalewski, C. K., Mastroianni, M. A., Moore, D. F., Brady, R. O., et al. (2007). Neuropathic and cerebrovascular correlates of hearing loss in Fabry disease. Brain, 130, 143–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. E. (1974). Behaviour and perception in strange environments. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossier, J., Haeberli, C., & Schenk, F. (2000). Auditory cues support place navigation in rats when associated with a visual cue. Behavioural Brain Research, 117, 209–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seurinck, R., Vingerhoets, G., de Lange, F. P., & Achten, E. (2004). Does egocentric mental rotation elicit sex differences? NeuroImage, 23, 1440–1449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sholl, M. J. (1989). The relation between horizontality and rod-andframe and vestibular navigational performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanucci, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., Banton, T., & Epstein, W. (2005). Distances appear different on hills. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1052–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow, N. R., Auerbach, P., Monroe, S. M., Hartston, H., Geyer, M. A., & Braff, D. L. (1993). Men are more inhibited than women by weak prepulses. Biological Psychiatry, 34, 253–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swerdlow, N. R., Filion, D., Geyer, M. A., & Braff, D. L. (1995). “Normal” personality correlates of sensorimotor, cognitive, and visuospatial gating. Biological Psychiatry, 37, 286–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. V., Letowski, T., & Abouchacra, K. S. (2000). Evaluation of acoustic beacon characteristics for navigation tasks. Ergonomics, 43, 807–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, L., & Elliott, D. (2007). Sex differences in judging selforientation: the morphological horizon and body pitch. BMC Neuroscience, 8, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trousselard, M., Barraud, P.-A., Nougier, V., Raphel, C., & Cian, C. (2004). Contribution of tactile and interoceptive cues to the perception of the direction of gravity. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 355–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S., Newcombe, N., & Overton, W. (1986). Turn left at the church, or three miles north: A study of direction giving and sex differences. Environment & Behavior, 18, 192–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, F., & Kistler, D. (2005). Measurement and validation of human HRTFs for use in hearing research. Acta Acustica United With Acustica, 91, 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witelson, S. F., Beresh, H., & Kigar, D. L. (2006). Intelligence and brain size in 100 postmortem brains: sex, lateralization and age factors. Brain, 129, 386–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wraga, M., Duncan, L., Jacobs, E. C., Helt, M., & Church, J. (2006). Stereotype susceptibility narrows the gender gap in imagined self-rotation performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 813–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuidhoek, S., Kappers, A. M. L., & Postma, A. (2007). Haptic orientation perception: Sex differences and lateralization of functions. Neuropsychologia, 45, 332–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, 85044-1104, Tempe, AZ

    Yoko K. Naylor & Michael K. McBeath

Authors
  1. Yoko K. Naylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael K. McBeath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael K. McBeath.

Additional information

This work was funded in part by NSF Grant BCS-0318313.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naylor, Y.K., McBeath, M.K. Gender differences in spatial perception of body tilt. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 199–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.2.199

Download citation

  • Received: 27 February 2006

  • Accepted: 03 August 2007

  • Issue Date: February 2008

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.2.199

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Mental Rotation
  • Fabry Disease
  • Spatial Ability
  • Auditory Information
  • Visual Illusion
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

3.239.2.192

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature