Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 82–87 | Cite as

The effects of emotion on tip-of-the-tongue states

  • Bennett L. Schwartz
Brief Reports


Tip-of-the-tongue states (TOTs) are judgments of the likelihood of imminent retrieval for items currently not recalled. In the present study, the relation of emotion to the experience of TOTs is explored. Emotion-inducing questions (e.g.), “What is the term for ritual suicide in Japan?”) were embedded among neutral questions (e.g., “What is the capital of Denmark?”). Participants attempted to recall the answers and, if unsuccessful, were asked if they were in a TOT and given a recognition test. For unrecalled items, there were significantly more TOTs for the emotional items than for the neutral items, even though the recognition performance was identical. There were more TOTs for questions that followed emotional questions than TOTs for questions that followed neutral questions, suggesting the emotional arousal lasts beyond the specific question. These findings suggest that emotional cues increase the likelihood of TOTs. These data are consistent with a metacognitive view of TOTs.


Recognition Performance Motion Sickness Neutral Item Lexical Retrieval Emotional Item 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allman, J. M., Hakeem, A., Erwin, J. M., Nimchinsky, E., & Hof, P. (2001). Anterior cingulate cortex: The evolution of an interface between emotion and cognition. In A. R. Damasio, A. Harrington, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Unity of knowledge: The convergence of natural and human sciences (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 935, pp. 105–117). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  2. Brennen, T., Vikan, R., & Dybdahl, R. (2007). Are tip-of-the-tongue states universal? Evidence from the speakers of an unwritten language. Memory, 15, 167–176. doi:10.1080/09658210601164743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 204–223. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5, 325–337. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80040-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galdo-Alvarez, S., Lindín, M., & Díaz, F. (2009). The effect of age on event-related potentials (ERP) associated with face naming and the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) state. Biological Psychology, 81, 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.01.002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gollan, T. H., & Brown, A. S. (2006). From tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) data to theoretical implications in two steps: When more TOTs means better retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 462–483. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kensinger, E. A. (2009). How emotion affects older adults’ memories for event details. Memory, 17, 208–219. doi:10.1080/09658210802221425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). Memory and emotion. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), The handbook of emotion (3rd ed., pp. 601–617). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Leboe, J. P., & Ansons, T. L. (2006). On misattributing good remembering to a happy past: An investigation into the cognitive roots of nostalgia. Emotion, 6, 596–610. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Maril, A., Simons, J. S., Weaver, J. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2005). Graded recall success: An event-related fMRI comparison of tip of the tongue and feeling of knowing. NeuroImage, 24, 1130–1138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Maril, A., Wagner, A. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). On the tip of the tongue: An event-related fMRI study of semantic retrieval failure and cognitive conflict. Neuron, 31, 653–660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19, 851–861. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 338–368. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90266-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schwartz, B. L. (2001). The relation of tip-of-the-tongue states and retrieval time. Memory & Cognition, 29, 117–126.Google Scholar
  15. Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Tip-of-the-tongue states: Phenomenology, mechanism, and lexical retrieval. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Schwartz, B. L. (2006). Tip-of-the-tongue states as metacognition. Metacognition & Learning, 1, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwartz, B. L. (2008). Working memory load differentially affects tip-of-the-tongue states and feeling-of-knowing judgment. Memory & Cognition, 36, 9–19. doi:10.3758/MC.36.1.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schwartz, B. L., & Smith, S. M. (1997). The retrieval of related information influences tip-of-the tongue states. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 68–86. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwartz, B. L., Travis, D. M., Castro, A. M., & Smith, S. M. (2000). The phenomenology of real and illusory tip-of-the-tongue states. Memory & Cognition, 28, 18–27.Google Scholar
  20. Shimamura, A. P. (2008). A neurocognitive approach to metacognitive monitoring and control. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of memory and metamemory: Essays in honor of Thomas O. Nelson (pp. 373–390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, S. M. (1994). Frustrated feelings of imminent recall: On the tip of the tongue. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 27–45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M. F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8, 314–317. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00444.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2003). Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart). Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 62–79. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00009-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilkinson, T. S., & Nelson, T. O. (1984). FACTRETRIEVAL2: A Pascal program for assessing someone’s recall of general-information facts, conf idence about recall correctness, feeling-of-knowing judgments for nonrecalled facts, and recognition of nonrecalled facts. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 486–488.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida International UniversityMiami

Personalised recommendations