Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article
Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Brief Reports
  • Published: October 2009

Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts

  • Jennifer C. McVay1,
  • Michael J. Kane1 &
  • Thomas R. Kwapil1 

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review volume 16, pages 857–863 (2009)Cite this article

  • 4105 Accesses

  • 204 Citations

  • 33 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

In an experience-sampling study that bridged laboratory, ecological, and individual-differences approaches to mind-wandering research, 72 subjects completed an executive-control task with periodic thought probes (reported by McVay & Kane, 2009) and then carried PDAs for a week that signaled them eight times daily to report immediately whether their thoughts were off task. Subjects who reported more mind wandering during the laboratory task endorsed more mind-wandering experiences during everyday life (and were more likely to report worries as off-task thought content). We also conceptually replicated laboratory findings that mind wandering predicts task performance: Subjects rated their daily-life performance to be impaired when they reported off-task thoughts, with greatest impairment when subjects’ mind wandering lacked metaconsciousness. The propensity to mind wander appears to be a stable cognitive characteristic and seems to predict performance difficulties in daily life, just as it does in the laboratory

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Antrobus, J. S., Singer, J. L., & Greenberg, S. (1966). Studies in the stream of consciousness: Experimental enhancement and suppression of spontaneous cognitive processes. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 23, 399–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar, M. (2007). The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 280–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F., & Barrett, D. J. (2004). The Experience Sampling Program (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved February 2004 from http://www2.bc.edu/_barretli/esp/.

  • Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 49–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, P. W., Dumontheil, I., & Gilbert, S. J. (2007). The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 290–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, P., & Giuntoli, D. (1972). Consciousness sampling in the college classroom or Is anybody listening? Intellect, 101, 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 8719–8724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 145–199). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geerligs, T. (1995). Students’ thoughts during problem-based smallgroup discussions. Instructional Science, 22, 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giambra, L. M. (1995). A laboratory method for investigating influences on switching attention to task-unrelated imagery and thought. Consciousness & Cognition, 4, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodsky, A., & Giambra, L. M. (1990/1991). The consistency across vigilance and reading tasks of individual differences in the occurrence of task-unrelated and task-related images and thoughts. Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 10, 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T. (1979). Random sampling of cognitions and behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intel Corp. (2004). iESP [Computer software]. Retrieved April 2004 from http://seattleweb.intel-research.net/projects/ESM/iESP.html.

  • Kane, M. J., Brown, L. E., McVay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 614–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E. (1971). Structure and functions of fantasy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E. (1978/1979). Dimensions of thought and imagery in normal waking states. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 4, 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E. (1999). Thought flow: Properties and mechanisms underlying shifts in content. In J. A. Singer & P. Salovey (Eds.), At play in the fields of consciousness: Essays in honor of Jerome L. Singer (pp. 29–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E., & Cox, W. M. (1987/1988). Dimensions of thought flow in everyday life. Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 7, 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315, 393–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35, 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsella, E. (2005). The function of phenomenal states: Supramodular interaction theory. Psychological Review, 112, 1000–1021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). “Oops!”: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. M. (2008). Consciousness and its function. Neuropsychologia, 46, 829–840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., Pierce, G. R., & Sarason, B. R. (1996). Cognitive interference: Theories, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, J. R. (1970). Use of consciousness sampling to study teaching methods. Journal of Educational Research, 9, 387–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 339–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2004). Zoning out while reading: Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. In D. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 203–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. L. (1968). The importance of daydreaming. Psychology Today, 1, 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. L., & Singer, D. G. (2006). Preschoolers’ imaginative play as precursor of narrative consciousness. Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 25, 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J. M., Baracaia, S. F., Lowe, M., & Obonsawin, M. (2003). Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information. Consciousness & Cognition, 12, 452–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Beach, E., Schooler, J. W., & Handy, T. C. (2008). Going AWOL in the brain: Mind wandering reduces cortical analysis of external events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 458–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Davies, J. B., Heim, D., Finnigan, F., Sudberry, M., O’Connor, R., & Obonsawin, M. (2004). Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Consciousness & Cognition, 13, 657–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Fishman, D. J., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). Counting the cost of an absent mind: Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 230–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Fitzgerald, A., Miles, L. K., & Phillips, L. H. (2009). Shifting moods, wandering minds: Negative moods lead the mind to wander. Emotion, 9, 271–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). The lights are on but no one’s home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 527–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1144–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., O’Connor, R. C., Sudbery, M. V., & Obonsawin, M. (2007). Mind-wandering and dysphoria. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 816–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., Riby, L., Heim, D., & Davies, J. B. (2006). Encoding during the attentional lapse: Accuracy of encoding during the semantic sustained attention to response task. Consciousness & Cognition, 15, 218–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C. A., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and stimulus-independent thought: Effects of memory load and presentation rate. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, E. R. (2008). Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 163–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmann, D. A., Shappell, S. A., Boquet, A., Detwiler, C., Holcomb, K., & Faaborg, T. (2005). Human error and general aviation accidents: A comprehensive, fine-grained analysis using HFACS (Final Tech. Rep.). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of North Carolina, P.O. Box 26170, 27402-6170, Greensboro, NC

    Jennifer C. McVay, Michael J. Kane & Thomas R. Kwapil

Authors
  1. Jennifer C. McVay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Kane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas R. Kwapil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Kane.

Additional information

Portions of this work were supported by a UNCG Regular Faculty Grant awarded to M.J.K. and an NIH Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Individual Predoctoral Fellowship granted to J.C.M., Award F31MH081344 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIMH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McVay, J.C., Kane, M.J. & Kwapil, T.R. Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 857–863 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.857

Download citation

  • Received: 29 January 2009

  • Accepted: 05 June 2009

  • Issue Date: October 2009

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.857

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Work Memory Capacity
  • Contextual Predictor
  • Response Time Variability
  • Attentional Lapse
  • Mind Wandering
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 34.232.62.64

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.