Abstract
A growing number of researchers use descriptive distributions such as the ex-Gaussian and the shifted Wald to summarize response time data for speeded two-choice tasks. Some of these researchers also assume that the parameters of these distributions uniquely correspond to specific cognitive processes. We studied the validity of this cognitive interpretation by relating the parameters of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald distributions to those of the Ratcliff diffusion model, a successful model whose parameters have well-established cognitive interpretations. In a simulation study, we fitted the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald distributions to data generated from the diffusion model by systematically varying its parameters across a wide range of plausible values. In an empirical study, the two descriptive distributions were fitted to published data that featured manipulations of task difficulty, response caution, and a priori bias. The results clearly demonstrate that the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters do not correspond uniquely to parameters of the diffusion model. We conclude that researchers should resist the temptation to interpret changes in the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters in terms of cognitive processes. Supporting materials may be downloaded from http://pbr.psychonomic-journals .org/content/supplemental.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, S., & Heathcote, A. (2001). Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: A matter of some moment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 514–544.
Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 32–55.
Blough, D. S. (1988). Quantitative relations between visual search speed and target—distractor similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 57–71.
Blough, D. S. (1989). Contrast as seen in visual search reaction times. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 199–211.
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational & Graphical Statistics, 7, 434–455.
Burbeck, S. L., & Luce, R. D. (1982). Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 117–133.
Carpenter, R. H. S., & Williams, M. L. L. (1995). Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements. Nature, 377, 59–62.
Emerson, P. L. (1970). Simple reaction time with Markovian evolution of Gaussian discriminal processes. Psychometrika, 35, 99–110.
Epstein, J. N.. Conners, C. K.. Hervey, A. S.. Tonev, S. T.. Arnold, L. E.. Abikoff, H. B.. et al. (2006). Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 47, 446–456.
Farrell, S., & Ludwig, C. J. H. (2008). Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimation of hierarchical response time models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1209–1217.
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/ hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gholson, B., & Hohle, R. H. (1968a). Choice reaction times to hues printed in conflicting hue names and nonsense words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 413–418.
Gholson, B., & Hohle, R. (1968b). Verbal reaction times to hues and hue names and forms and form names. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 191–196.
Gomez, P.. Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2007). A model of the go/no-go task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 389–413.
Gordon, B., & Carson, K. (1990). The basis for choice reaction time slowing in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain & Cognition, 13, 148–166.
Heathcote, A. (2004). Fitting Wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: An example using functions for the S-PLUS package. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 678–694.
Heathcote, A.. Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340–347.
Hockley, W. E. (1982). Retrieval processes in continuous recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 497–512.
Hockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 598–615.
Hohle, R. H. (1965). Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 382–386.
Kieffaber, P. D.. Kappenman, E. S.. Bodkins, M.. Shekhar, A., O’Donnell, B. F., & Hetrick, W. P. (2006). Switch and maintenance of task set in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 84, 345–358.
Lee, M. D. (2008). Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1–15.
Leth-Steensen, C.. King Elbaz, Z., & Douglas, V. I. (2000). Mean response times, variability and skew in the responding of ADHD children: A response time distributional approach. Acta Psychologica, 104, 167–190.
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lunn, D. J.. Thomas, A.. Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2000). WinBUGS—A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics & Computing, 10, 325–337.
Madden, D. J.. Gottlob, L. R.. Denny, L. L.. Turkington, T. G., Provenzale, J. M.. Hawk, T. C., & Coleman, R. E. (1999). Aging and recognition memory: Changes in regional cerebral blood flow associated with components of reaction time distributions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 511–520.
McGill, W. [J.] (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 309–360). New York: Wiley.
McGill, W. J., & Gibbon, J. (1965). The general-gamma distribution and reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2, 1–18.
Myung, I. J. (2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 90–100.
Okada, R. (1971). Decision latencies in short-term recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 27–32.
Penner-Wilger, M.. Leth-Steensen, C., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2002). Decomposing the problem-size effect: A comparison of response time distributions across cultures. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1160–1167.
Plourde, C. E., & Besner, D. (1997). On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 181–194.
Possamaï, C.-A. (1991). A responding hand effect in a simple-RT precueing experiment: Evidence for a late locus of facilitation. Acta Psychologica, 77, 47–63.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.
Ratcliff, R. (2002). A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 278–291.
Ratcliff, R.. Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159–182.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922.
Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 83, 190–214.
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (2000). A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 127–140.
Ratcliff, R.. Thapar, A.. Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. Psychology & Aging, 19, 278–289.
Ratcliff, R.. Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2001). The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychology & Aging, 16, 323–341.
Ratcliff, R.. Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 523–535.
Ratcliff, R.. Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on recognition memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 408–424.
Rohrer, D. (1996). On the relative and absolute strength of a memory trace. Memory & Cognition, 24, 188–201.
Rohrer, D. (2002). The breadth of memory search. Memory, 10, 291–301.
Rohrer, D., & Wixted, J. T. (1994). An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 22, 511–524.
Rotello, C. M., & Zeng, M. (2008). Analysis of RT distributions in the remember—know paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 825–832.
Rouder, J. N.. Lu, J.. Speckman, P.. Sun, D., & Jiang, Y. (2005). A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 195–223.
Rouder, J. N.. Sun, D.. Speckman, P. L.. Lu, J., & Zhou, D. (2003). A hierarchical Bayesian statistical framework for response time distributions. Psychometrika, 68, 589–606.
Schmiedek, F.. Oberauer, K.. Wilhelm, O.. Süß, H.-M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429.
Schouten, J. F., & Bekker, J. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 27, 143–153.
Schwarz, W. (2001). The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 457–469.
Schwarz, W. (2002). On the convolution of inverse Gaussian and exponential random variables. Communications in Statistics: Theory & Methods, 31, 2113–2121.
Shiffrin, R. M.. Lee, M. D.. Kim, W., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248–1284.
Smith, P. L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. Psychological Review, 102, 567–593.
Spieler, D. H. (2001). Modelling age-related changes in information processing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 217–234.
Spieler, D. H.. Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 461–479.
Spieler, D. H.. Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (2000). Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 506–526.
Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.
Thapar, A.. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on letter discrimination. Psychology & Aging, 18, 415–429.
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2007). Fitting the Ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1011–1026.
Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2008). Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: A DMAT primer. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 61–72.
Voss, A.. Rothermund, K., & Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1206–1220.
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 641–671.
Wagenmakers, E.-J.. Ratcliff, R.. Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 140–159.
Wagenmakers, E.-J.. van der Maas, H. L. J.. Dolan, C. V., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2008). EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1229–1235.
Wagenmakers, E.-J.. van der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2007). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 3–22.
Wald, A. (1947). Sequential analysis. New York: Wiley.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed—accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67–85.
Wixted, J. T.. Ghadisha, H., & Vera, R. (1997). Recall latency following pure- and mixed-strength lists: A direct test of the relative strength model of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 523–538.
Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (1993). Proactive interference and the dynamics of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1024–1039.
Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2007). Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 274–296.
Yap, M. J.. Balota, D. A.. Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. (2006). Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: Insights from response time distributional analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1324–1344.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by a Vidi grant from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matzke, D., Wagenmakers, EJ. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 798–817 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.798
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.798