Abstract
Eight pigeons responded in a concurrent chain with variable-interval (VI) 10-sec and VI 20-sec terminal links. Free food deliveries were then added to the initial links according to a variable-time (VT) 20-sec schedule in two conditions that differed in terms of whether a differential reinforcement of other (DRO) contingency was also arranged, which ensured that those deliveries could not occur within 2-sec of a response. Preference for the VI 10-sec terminal link increased when VT food was added, but not when the DRO contingency was operative, showing that free food deliveries affected preference only when those deliveries could be temporally contiguous with choice responding. This finding suggests that Mazur’s (2003) report of increased preference with added VT food, replicated here, was due to adventitious reinforcement. Current models for behavioral choice are limited because they are based entirely on temporal relations between stimuli and reinforcers and fail to take into account response-reinforcer contiguity.
Article PDF
References
Bell, M. C. (1999). Pavlovian contingencies and resistance to change in a multiple schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 81–96.
Fantino, E. (1969). Choice and rate of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 723–730.
Fleshler, M., & Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 529–530.
Grace, R. C. (1994). A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 113–129.
Grace, R. C., Schwendiman, J. I., & Nevin, J. A. (1998). Effects of delayed reinforcement on preference and resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 247–261.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards, Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792.
Hastjarjo, T., & Silberberg, A. (1992). Effects of reinforcer delays on choice as a function of income level. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 119–125.
Hastjarjo, T., Silberberg, A., & Hursh, S. R. (1990). Risky choice as a function of amount and variance in food supply. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 155–161.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.
Mazur, J. E. (2001). Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice. Psychological Review, 108, 96–112.
Mazur, J. E. (2003). Effects of free-food deliveries and delays on choice under concurrent-chains schedules. Behavioural Processes, 64, 251–260.
Rachlin, H., & Baum, W. M. (1972). Effects of alternative reinforcement: Does the source matter? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 231–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scoones, C., Hucks, A., McLean, A.P. et al. Effects of free food deliveries and temporal contiguity on choice under concurrent-chain schedules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 736–741 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.736
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.736