Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article
Swinging into thought: Directed movement guides insight in problem solving
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Brief Reports
  • Published: August 2009

Swinging into thought: Directed movement guides insight in problem solving

  • Laura E. Thomas1 &
  • Alejandro Lleras2 

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review volume 16, pages 719–723 (2009)Cite this article

  • 2553 Accesses

  • 61 Citations

  • 29 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Can directed actions unconsciously influence higher order cognitive processing? We investigated how movement interventions affected participants’ ability to solve a classic insight problem. The participants attempted to solve Maier’s two-string problem while occasionally taking exercise breaks during which they moved their arms either in a manner related to the problem’s solution (swing group) or in a manner inconsistent with the solution (stretch group). Although most of the participants were unaware of the relationship between their arm movement exercises and the problem-solving task, the participants who moved their arms in a manner that suggested the problem’s solution were more likely to solve the problem than were those who moved their arms in other ways. Consistent with embodied theories of cognition, these findings show that actions influence thought and, furthermore, that we can implicitly guide people toward insight by directing their actions.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002149

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., & Holt, L. E. (2007). Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological Science, 18, 51–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01848.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleves, M. A., Gould, W. W., & Gutierrez, R. G. (2002). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106, 1047–1058. doi:10.1016/ j.cognition.2007.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J., & Spence, C. (2004). Crossmodal spatial attention: Evidence from human performance. In C. Spence & J. Driver (Eds.), Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (pp. 179–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55. doi:10.1017/S0140525X97000010

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2008). Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology, 18, R290-R291. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning as mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 280–285. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. C., & Zhao, Z. (2004). Double dissociations in visual and spatial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 355–381. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, R. E. (1990). Maier’s (1931) two-string problem revisited: Evidence for spontaneous transfer. Psychological Reports, 67, 1079–1088. doi:10.2466/PR0.67.8.1079-1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaluso, E., Frith, C. D., & Driver, J. (2000). Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. Science, 289, 1206–1208. doi:10.1126/science.289.5482.1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 12, 181–194. doi:10.1037/h0071361

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K., Ernst, G. W., & Banerji, R. (1974). The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 436–450. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90020-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (2006). The basic-systems model of episodic memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 277–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 61–87. doi:10.2307/1422851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stepper, S., & Strack, F. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64, 211–220. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 768–777. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2007). Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 663–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2009). Covert shifts of attention function as an implicit aid to insight. Cognition, 111, 168–174. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution of several “insight” problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 169–192. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.2.169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 1, 219–230. doi:10.1207/ s15324834basp0103_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Vanderbilt University, 301 Wilson Hall 111 21st Avenue South, 37203, Nashville, TN

    Laura E. Thomas

  2. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois

    Alejandro Lleras

Authors
  1. Laura E. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alejandro Lleras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura E. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, L.E., Lleras, A. Swinging into thought: Directed movement guides insight in problem solving. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 719–723 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.719

Download citation

  • Received: 18 August 2008

  • Accepted: 16 March 2009

  • Issue Date: August 2009

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.719

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Spatial Compatibility
  • Insight Problem
  • String Problem
  • Posttest Questionnaire
  • Stretch Group
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 34.239.152.207

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.