Evidence for semantic preview benefit (PB) from parafoveal words has been elusive for reading alphabetic scripts such as English. Here we report semantic PB for noncompound characters in Chinese reading with the boundary paradigm. In addition, PBs for orthographic relatedness and, as a numeric trend, for phonological relatedness were obtained. Results are in agreement with other research suggesting that the Chinese writing system is based on a closer association between graphic form and meaning than is alphabetic script. We discuss implications for notions of serial attention shifts and parallel distributed processing of words during reading.
Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390.
Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Dai, B., & Vasishth, S. (2008). lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes (R Package Version 0.999375-27) [Software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/lme4.
Chen, H.-C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 511–518.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.1.204
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415–422.
Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43, 1035–1045. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2001). Rowed to recovery: The use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1079–1100.
Gao, J., Fan, K., & Fei, J. (1993). Xiandai hanzi xue [The study of modern Chinese characters]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (in press). Neural constraints on a functional architecture for word recognition. In P. Cornelissen, P. Hansen, M. Kringelbach, & K. Pugh (Eds.), The neural basis of reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Inhoff, A. W. (1990). Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role of letter and word units. Acta Psychologica, 73, 281–297.
Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1997). The perceptual span during the reading of Chinese text. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 243–266). Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 20–34.
Inhoff, A. W., & Tousman, S. (1990). Lexical integration across saccades in reading. Psychological Research, 52, 330–337.
Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45, 153–168. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037
Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35. doi:10.1037/0096-34220.127.116.11
Kliegl, R., Risse, S., & Laubrock, J. (2007). Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n 1 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1250–1255. doi:10.1037/0096-1518.104.22.1680
Lee, C.-Y., Tsai, J.-L., Chan, W.-H., Hsu, C.-H., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2007). Temporal dynamics of the consistency effect in reading Chinese: An event-related potentials study. NeuroReport, 18, 147–151.
Liu, W., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1213–1227. doi:10.1037/0096-1522.214.171.1243
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578–586.
Meng, X., Jian, J., Shu, H., Tian, X., & Zhou, X. (2008). ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading. Brain Research, 1219, 91–102. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.052
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43–59. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 148–162.
Pollatsek, A., Tan, L. H., & Rayner, K. (2000). The role of phonological codes in integrating information across saccadic eye movements in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 607–633.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.
Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473–483.
Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Brown, S. J. (2007). Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n 1 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 230–245. doi:10.1037/0096-15126.96.36.199
Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at www.r-project.org.
Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115–119.
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47.
Tsai, C.-H., & McConkie, G. W. (1995, September). The perceptual span in reading Chinese text: A moving window study. Poster presented at the Eighth European Conference on Eye Movements, Derby, U.K.
Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Tzeng, O. J.-L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, N.-S. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain & Language, 91, 235–244. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.02.005
Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (in press). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n 1 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Yin, B., & Rohsenow, J. S. (1994). Xian dai han zi [Modern Chinese characters]. Beijing: Chinese Language Teaching Press.
Yu, B., Zhang, W., Jing, Q., Peng, R., Zhang, G., & Simon, H. A. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese and English language materials. Memory & Cognition, 13, 202–207.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 579–606.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1245–1265.
The research reported here was supported by a fellowship from the China Scholarship Council to M.Y. and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant KL 655/8 to R.K. and Ralf Engbert.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, M., Richter, E.M., Shu, H. et al. Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 561–566 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.561
- Target Word
- Fixation Duration
- Chinese Character
- Critical Word
- Preview Benefit