Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 561–566 | Cite as

Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words

Brief Reports

Abstract

Evidence for semantic preview benefit (PB) from parafoveal words has been elusive for reading alphabetic scripts such as English. Here we report semantic PB for noncompound characters in Chinese reading with the boundary paradigm. In addition, PBs for orthographic relatedness and, as a numeric trend, for phonological relatedness were obtained. Results are in agreement with other research suggesting that the Chinese writing system is based on a closer association between graphic form and meaning than is alphabetic script. We discuss implications for notions of serial attention shifts and parallel distributed processing of words during reading.

References

  1. Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Dai, B., & Vasishth, S. (2008). lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes (R Package Version 0.999375-27) [Software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/lme4.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, H.-C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.1.204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43, 1035–1045. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2001). Rowed to recovery: The use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1079–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao, J., Fan, K., & Fei, J. (1993). Xiandai hanzi xue [The study of modern Chinese characters]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
  10. Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (in press). Neural constraints on a functional architecture for word recognition. In P. Cornelissen, P. Hansen, M. Kringelbach, & K. Pugh (Eds.), The neural basis of reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Inhoff, A. W. (1990). Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role of letter and word units. Acta Psychologica, 73, 281–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1997). The perceptual span during the reading of Chinese text. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 243–266). Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
  14. Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inhoff, A. W., & Tousman, S. (1990). Lexical integration across saccades in reading. Psychological Research, 52, 330–337.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45, 153–168. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kliegl, R., Risse, S., & Laubrock, J. (2007). Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n 1 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1250–1255. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, C.-Y., Tsai, J.-L., Chan, W.-H., Hsu, C.-H., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2007). Temporal dynamics of the consistency effect in reading Chinese: An event-related potentials study. NeuroReport, 18, 147–151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, W., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1213–1227. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meng, X., Jian, J., Shu, H., Tian, X., & Zhou, X. (2008). ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading. Brain Research, 1219, 91–102. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43–59. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pollatsek, A., Tan, L. H., & Rayner, K. (2000). The role of phonological codes in integrating information across saccadic eye movements in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 607–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473–483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Brown, S. J. (2007). Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n 1 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 230–245. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  30. R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
  31. Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsai, C.-H., & McConkie, G. W. (1995, September). The perceptual span in reading Chinese text: A moving window study. Poster presented at the Eighth European Conference on Eye Movements, Derby, U.K.Google Scholar
  34. Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Tzeng, O. J.-L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, N.-S. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain & Language, 91, 235–244. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (in press). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n 1 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.Google Scholar
  36. Yin, B., & Rohsenow, J. S. (1994). Xian dai han zi [Modern Chinese characters]. Beijing: Chinese Language Teaching Press.Google Scholar
  37. Yu, B., Zhang, W., Jing, Q., Peng, R., Zhang, G., & Simon, H. A. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese and English language materials. Memory & Cognition, 13, 202–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1245–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Peking UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and LearningBeijing Normal UniversityChina

Personalised recommendations