Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 328–331 | Cite as

Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect

  • Samuel Shaki
  • Martin H. Fischer
  • William M. Petrusic
Brief Reports

Abstract

This study compared the spatial representation of numbers in three groups of adults: Canadians, who read both English words and Arabic numbers from left to right; Palestinians, who read Arabic words and Arabic-Indic numbers from right to left; and Israelis, who read Hebrew words from right to left but Arabic numbers from left to right. Canadians associated small numbers with left and large numbers with right space (the SNARC effect), Palestinians showed the reverse association, and Israelis had no reliable spatial association for numbers. These results suggest that reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the spatial representation of numbers.

Keywords

Spatial Association Grip Aperture Mental Number Line Number Magnitude Parity Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andres, M., Davare, M., Pesenti, M., Olivier, E., & Seron, X. (2004). Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction. NeuroReport, 15, 2773–2777.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fias, W., & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43–54). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44, 386–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hines, T. M. (1990). An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits. Memory & Cognition, 18, 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hung, Y.-H., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J.-L., & Wu, D. H. (2008). Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition, 106, 1441–1450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32, 662–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keus, I. M., & Schwarz, W. (2005). Searching for the locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin. Memory & Cognition, 33, 681–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nuerk, H. C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 835–863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Opfer, J. E., & Thompson, C. A. (2006). Even early representations of numerical magnitude are spatially organized: Evidence from a directional magnitude bias in pre-reading preschoolers. In R. Sun & N. Miyaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 639–644). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with manual and saccadic responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers— A cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108, 590–599.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wood, G., Nuerk, H. C., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489–525.Google Scholar
  15. Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition & Culture, 5, 166–190.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Shaki
    • 1
  • Martin H. Fischer
    • 2
  • William M. Petrusic
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral SciencesAriel University Center of SamariaArielIsrael
  2. 2.University of DundeeDundeeScotland
  3. 3.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations